Skip to comments.Obama Signs START Treaty in Relative Privacy
Posted on 02/02/2011 8:42:01 AM PST by Nachum
President Obama will host Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) for a private meeting at the White House on Wednesday. It will be the first meeting between the president and his 2008 Republican adversary since Obama took office. The White House said Tuesday night the Oval Office meeting would take place Wednesday afternoon, though there was no indication as to the reason for the meeting, or scheduled topics for discussion. Obama and McCain sat down for talks at transition headquarters in Chicago after the Democrat's election.
(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
That figures. Maybe Obama will dump Biden and ask McCain to run with him in 2012.
“...so anyway John, you don’t have to endorse me this election cycle. I can take it from here.”
“What I would like is a few more comments of praise over the next 18 months. That should just about do it.”
“Now if you could also state, American doesn’t have anything to fear from this president, I’d sure appreciate it.”
“Ah, you betcha Barack. You’re my pal. Here, give me a hug.”
i see no other word for the deliberate disarming the country while our enemies / adversaries build up. (force multipliers are how you deal with china... period)
in case you're wonder how much of a butt f*cking this is for you, your family and those that came before that worked hard to gives us a position of strength in the world...
"The new START treaty re-establishes a monitoring system that expired in December of 2009 and limits the U.S. and Russia to 1,550 strategic warheads, a decrease of 650."
this would mean we currently have 2,200... down from 5,113 in june. 50% reduction in 6 months. 70% reduction when they are finished. this is down from the 23,000+ when i left washdc in the early 90s.... or 94% reduction of our capabilities
and yes... russia has already said they won't adhere to any such policy. basically laughing and saying we can reduce our stockpile.. it'll have no effect on them.
America... you're bent over and that cold slimy feeling is the KY being applied.
Don’t know what it is about????? Please. It is the biggest desire for Senator McCain and President Obama..........AMNESTY! These folks must think we are stupid.
You should have put “Friend” in there somewhere....however it was a fantastic and realistic post.
How many do we need to protect America? Wouldn’t ten do the trick. Heck one would do a whole heck of a lot of damage. I am not in agreement with doing away with them but just figure we can get er done with ten.
True, “Friend” does seem to be McCain’s operative word doesn’t it.
a couple pics here..
Caption: Meanwhile, at the White House.. a New START
here’s the scenario
china does nothing small. they believe in overwhelming an opponent and have for thousands of years. what would that mean in this case?
we have 7 carrier groups and 188 F22s... and a big bread basket of food in the middle of our country, otherwise known as the prize... surrounded by mountain ranges on the east and west. why are the mountain ranges significant? because they will block any fallout from hitting the food. we also have 80% of our population within 50 miles of the coast.
so... you’re china... how do you get the prize?
subterranean nukes on the east and west coast on the first strike along with an EMP over the center of the country and then mop up with conventional forces.
how would you do that?
the EMP would be launched from a space plane and get into position via secure satellite. (space plane... check. secure military grade communicates and satellite tech... check)
the nukes don’t have to be intercontinental... just enough to launch from offshore (launch missile from west coast without being detected, except for a contrail... check). you would prolly want multiple warheads per missile (w88 warhead tech... check) and subterranean detonation capability (check)
then you need to control the seas to ship the food home, via mississippi and the panama canal. this would mean you need to deal with the US navy... 7 carrier groups... and the airforce, only 188 F22s and a few hundred F16s (1000 F22s... working on it)
how to deal with them? nuclear sea mines for the carrier groups or sub launch (subs with nuclear warhead torpedoes... check). if that didn’t work... how about 100 carrier groups of your own? that would work.
and of course, have it all pop within the same 1-2 hr span (global synchronization technology... check)
what about the 1500 nukes America has? infiltrate the software development that is used to control the silos (check) and the launch systems (unknown). in country sabotage also to be used 1-2 hrs before 0 hour. meanwhile, they could attempt to shoot down our missiles (defense shield tech... check)
in the end, there would be 100 chinese carrier groups roaming the oceans, chinese troops controlling the mississippi and food production... and controlling the panama canal (panama canal... check)
if we tried to stop them? how? they would shut down any such effort and kill anyone that tried. we don’t even have steel production anymore.
then you’ll get people saying they wouldn’t do that because they hold a lot of US debt and many US dollars. hmmm... that’d be about $1 trillion in US debt and maybe $2 trillion in physical cash. even if the number was $5 trillion... that’s not much to pay for world domination and to insure the future of your country. hell, we’re ok with spending $2 trillion each year on social programs...
and in the face of all this... getting rid of your force multipliers is just stupid.
it’s best if the kiddies were to just stfu and sit down before they get us all killed. this is an adult game.
btw, i see this being 5-10 yrs out as they put their carrier groups together and train up their deep water navy.
oh, and having synchronized UCAVs helps a lot (check)
What? Comrade 0bama doesn't want to trumpet his TREASON to the whole Country?
You are one smart individual. I thank you for that explanation that I was very ignorant about. You taught me a ton tonight. Thank you very much! I sincerely appreciate it more than you can imagine.
Isn’t “Relative Privacy” another way to say “Semi-Secrecy?”