[BenKenobi]

“All serious reports (8%) for Gardasil have been carefully analyzed by medical experts. Experts have not found a common medical pattern to the reports of serious adverse events reported for Gardasil that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine.”

I’ve ran the analysis, and there *is* a clustering of symptoms.

I should also mention that Merck isn’t paying me a dime. How bout you?

You know, it’s funny. First I say that people have died from the Gardasil Vaccine, which you deny is the case. Now you are accepting that 58 people have died from the use of Gardasil, you are no longer attacking the source.

Funny that, eh? Look, Gardasil is an untested vaccine, and young girls are the lab rats. Pray those who have already come down with symptoms do not suffer long term damage.

[jalisco555]

First of all, whenever I comment on Gardasil on a thread on FR someone comes along accusing me of being a Merck stooge. For the record, I have never received a nickel from Merck. In fact, as a cytopathologist I can potentially see my livelihood threatened by widespread Gardasil adoption- i.e. less need for Pap smears, a major part of my livelihood. But even if I was the CEO of Merck it wouldn't change the facts of Gardasil's efficacy.

People get vaccinated and people die. Coincidence does not prove causality. There is no evidence linking the deaths or other injuries to Gardasil. Gardasil is very well studied. The various clinical trials have collectively involved tens of thousands of subjects over several years. None of these have shown any difference in death or serious outcomes between Gardasil recipients and controls. Sure, there have been a few deaths in each group but no greater than that expected actuarially in people that age.