Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alaska lawmakers propose ditching Palin gas line program
Anchorage Daily News ^ | February 4th, 2011 | BECKY BOHRER

Posted on 02/04/2011 2:00:06 PM PST by thackney

Leading state lawmakers introduced legislation Friday to abandon a centerpiece of former Gov. Sarah Palin's administration: a state-sanctioned effort to advance a major natural gas pipeline.

The measure from Alaska House Republicans underscored the impatience and skepticism that many lawmakers have expressed about the current process and a belief the state is no closer than it was several years ago to realizing the long-hoped-for line.

Under the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act championed by fellow Republican Palin, the state promised TransCanada Corp. up to $500 million to advance a line. TransCanada won the exclusive license in 2008.

The state has reported that reimbursements so far have topped $36 million.

The company missed a self-imposed target for reaching agreements with shippers at the end of 2010...

(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: energy; freepressforpalin; naturalgas; northslope; pipeline

1 posted on 02/04/2011 2:00:08 PM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sounds like Alaska’s leadership has gone straight to hell since Palin left office.


2 posted on 02/04/2011 2:05:50 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
"The company missed a self-imposed target for reaching agreements with shippers at the end of 2010.."

I fully suspect that Union involvement in trying to torpedo a Palin-created effort is paramount in keeping this pipeling from being built, so as to arm an opponent in bringing it up in a debate with Palin in the future. This smacks of Democrat corruption efforts in every case where they want to attack a FEARED opponent.

3 posted on 02/04/2011 2:14:07 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Sounds like Alaska’s leadership has gone straight to hell since Palin left office.

...and that the local GOP has returned to being the Murkowski corruptocrats they were before Palin banished them from power.

4 posted on 02/04/2011 2:15:14 PM PST by Dr. Thorne (Buy Gold and Guns Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

>>>I fully suspect that Union involvement in trying to torpedo a Palin-created effort is paramount in keeping this pipeling from being built, so as to arm an opponent in bringing it up in a debate with Palin in the future. This smacks of Democrat corruption efforts in every case where they want to attack a FEARED opponent.

I think more likely reason is the boom in shale gas in recent years. This has pushed the cost of natural gas down to a point where it is probably uneconomic to transport it across vast distances when there are other low cost sources much closer to end markets.


5 posted on 02/04/2011 2:17:59 PM PST by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

TransCanada could also be dragging it’s feet on the pipeline while nat-gas prices are so low.


6 posted on 02/04/2011 2:18:02 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Democrats and the Republicans in Alaska have joined forces to destroy Sarah Palin’s legacy; she threatened everything they stood for (CORRUPTION, PORK, PORK AND MORE PORK) and now they are cuddling back into their natural ways.

I have never seen a person so viciously attacked and maligned like Sarah in political history. Sick, I tell you, SICK!


7 posted on 02/04/2011 2:18:55 PM PST by wk4bush2004 (PALIN 2012! AMERICA WILL SHINE AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NC28203

Yep, I’d have to bet it’s the recent gusher of shale gas that is hitting the market and changing the economics of the pipeline.


8 posted on 02/04/2011 2:20:43 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That this venture isn’t progressing is hardly Palin’s fault, but we all know it will be attributed to her by her political enemies, no matter the reality. Corrupt politics still thrives, even in pristine Alsaka.


9 posted on 02/04/2011 2:21:12 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Corrupt Bastards Club is back in business. I wonder how much cash Exxon and BP sloshed around the state legislature to get this going?


10 posted on 02/04/2011 2:57:18 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Where’s Alsaka?


11 posted on 02/04/2011 3:09:58 PM PST by Celtic Cross (Looking to escape to Idaho--Will work for keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Topple Palin at all cost ping!


12 posted on 02/04/2011 3:14:33 PM PST by JaguarXKE (Life - It's 10 percent circumstances and 90 percent how you react to circumstances - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

That’s the same grandstanding legislature she had to fight after the 2008 campaign when she was still governor.

There are a lot of Murkowsky (i.e., Vichy) Republicans in that legislature.

- JP


13 posted on 02/04/2011 4:07:00 PM PST by Josh Painter ("There were a lot of WTF moments throughout that speech." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

That’s the same grandstanding legislature she had to fight after the 2008 campaign when she was still governor.

There are a lot of Murkowsky (i.e., Vichy) Republicans in that legislature.

- JP


14 posted on 02/04/2011 4:07:13 PM PST by Josh Painter ("There were a lot of WTF moments throughout that speech." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glorgau; NC28203
You're probably spot on.

I see the completion of this as a national defense or security issue, or something of that nature.

Of course, expecting the Congress or the President to think of the national interest is a little bit of a stretch, I'll admit.

15 posted on 02/04/2011 9:13:09 PM PST by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Only because it was a good idea FROM Sarah Palin.

Lease A Murkowski has lost her earmarks and is throwing a temper tantrum.


16 posted on 02/04/2011 9:15:53 PM PST by Eye of Unk (Time for a Muslim Free America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson