Skip to comments.Gay-Fearing Righties Swing, Miss -- Big Boycott Flops [retread zot]
Posted on 02/08/2011 10:51:15 AM PST by falkayn
When the Conservative Political Action Conference launches on February 10, the mood will be uncharacteristically flamboyant. Not only because the gay caucus GOProud will be prominently participating, but because the anti-gay National Organization for Marriage, the Family Research Council, and other "values" organizations won't be. Together, they've mounted a CPAC boycott, an effort to strip the newish homosexual element from the conservative coalition and part of a larger bid to forcibly remarry social and fiscal conservatives. The bet was that distaste for gay people themselvesas opposed to lightning rods like gay marriage or adoption, which aren't included in GOProud's platformis still a strong right-wing motivator. It's a bet they seem to have lost.
The split between the fiscal and social right is on the minds of Republicans as they gear up for the 2012 presidential campaign. But if the party Establishment is nervous about its fractured coalition, social conservatives are shaking in their bucks. The tea party is now the most electorally potent portion of the GOP base: Exit polls indicated that 41 percent of voters in the midterm House races supported the movement, and 87 percent of those people voted Republican. At the same time, only 50 percent of tea partyers self-identify as socially conservative. That's got to worry anti-gay groups, who suffered significant losses in 2010, culminating in the bi-partisan repeal of "don't ask, don't tell."
If groups like NOM are to have their agenda influence the coming presidential election, they'll need candidates to think tea partyers care about their issues. This is why they drew a line in the sand at CPACa line that potential GOP presidential candidates like Haley Barbour, Newt Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty, and front-runner-for-now Mitt Romney promptly crossed. So far, the only leading Republican to join the boycott is South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint. (Marco Rubio and Sarah Palin are skipping for what they say are unrelated reasons.) DeMint's the guy who once said gay people shouldn't be teachers. He's also said that a person "can't be a fiscal conservative and not be a social conservative." Half the tea party would disagree.
A general fear of gay peoplethat they are out to change the American way of lifewas a force in the 2004 and 2006 elections, thanks to Karl Rove, who worked with the GOP to put gay referenda on local ballots as a way to boost right-wing turnout. In 2008, gay-marriage bans again appeared on state ballots. In tea-party 2010, the Republicans didn't need to try the move again. Now, with the fizzling of the CPAC boycott, it seems this brand of fear-mongering has lost its usefulness. Even "family values" champion Rick Santorum will speak at CPAC, willing to let the issue slide in the interest of wooing a larger voting bloc.
In perhaps the most telling indication that the tactics of the anti-gay right have failed, conservative-website mogul Andrew Breitbart recently joined GOProud's advisory council. He's also announced that he'll host a dance party for gay CPAC attendees that he's dubbed the "Roy Cohn CPAC Breitbart Homocon Welcoming Eighties Extravaganza." Breitbart says he fears the LGBT-activist left "more than Al Qaeda," because he so disagrees with their agenda. But surely to the disappointment of some on his side, he's not afraid of gay people themselves.
Welcome to FR. What is your opinion of this article?
I don’t care what turd burglars do but I won’t conform to what they want.
Sounds a bit presumptuous and wishful-thinkingy.
Well America, it was good while it lasted.
Liars. The issue is not hatred for gay people. The issue is allowing gay ACTIVISTS to take over a supposedly conservative organization.
In any case, I'm sure the mood at CPAC will, indeed, be "uncharacteristically flamboyant." Perhaps they can stage a gay pride parade, and frolic to their hearts' content.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Why so little faith in America?
Now, for the real issue ~ CPAC is dead. They allowed the homosexuals to counsel their own agenda.
End of story.
Politically the American voting public is loathe to vote for Republicans who are soft on gays. We lost 2006, and possibly 2008 over that issue. $5 trillion more in national debt should convince your "anti-social conservative" crowd that, in fact, BUCKS and BOOTY CALLS are related, and you'd best take care to be astemious as required to get the votes.
Fear, no. Reluvsion, yes.
This is all about deviants normalizing their behavior. Imagine they are shocked to realize rimming, felching, and consuming fecal material is disgusting to some people.
In before the ZOT.
Social conservatives don’t fear anyone.
Thats just stupid. One of the most biased articles I’ve seen.
If the GOP thinks it can win without social conservatives, let them try.
If even the “conservatives” embrace people who define themselves by their perversions, we’re doomed. But you’re just here to stir the pot (troll) and won’t be on FR for very long.
I don’t care what they do to each other. I do care when they are shoving their “lifestyle” down the throats of children or demanding government approval for it.
There’s some staged deception going on here.
The poster has already been banned. I thought it’d take longer than that.
fear no, putting a fist up a mans arse, women wearing strap ons pretending to be men, men poking crap up another man yes it’s sick.
Maybe if they took the time to think for a change then they would know that it is disgusting and then on top of that they want rights based on sexual preference, hell lets go all out and not discriminate, animals, consenting incest, 9 wives the while shebang can have marriage, kids etc.
CPAC infiltrated who would have thought it , until you read their manifesto and the rules of around 25
“Gay fearing Righties” was probably a big red troll flag
Welcome to FR. What is your opinion of this article?
He really can’t say. He’s been zotted.
I do recall some previous posts here. I think others have called for the zot.
And, as we all know, zot happens.
you’re new to FR and you post this so why not tell us where you stand on this.
o BTW, there is no such thing as conservative and fofr the homosexual agenda.
conservatism is fiscal and socially.
If one is fiscal but liberal on social then they’;re libertarians not conservatives.
Seems the writer is a little dumb and thick hey.
oh and this article is pure B/S and full of lies, distortions and propaganda so again where do you stand on this issue as we do not know seeing as your new
You cannot be a social liberal and a fiscal conservative. To be a social liberal requires you to take peoples money and spend it on things people do not need or want.
another pro homo troll looking to split the conservative cause and normal traditional views.
They really need to get a life but now I expect the personal messages to start again like last time
Awww man...the best part of the zot (besides ridding the site of a maggot) are the graphics and getting a chance to see the viking kittehs!
Where are they????
This is the cut of his jib, mate.
It isn’t “gay”. It’s nasty and against the laws of God. This most likely cynical “gay” co-opt of the conservative agenda is most likely generated in order to attempt to destroy the conservative movement and FORCE them to make allowances UNTIL they, in fact, become liberals. I’m not trying to “boss” the homosexuals, and I’m not going to mistreat anyone - but, “required” approval from me is not mine to give. They don’t want to associate with me, and I don’t want to associate with them if I must pretend to approve of their so-called “lifestyle”. Never the twain shall meet.
Uh.. we’re going graphicless today.
Saves electrons nd computer screen phosphors.
Most screens don’t have phosphors anymore?!
Well, I meant all organized SPIN “coming out” of CPAC these days. Organized homosexuals should realize this — there’s a real self-interest in staying IN the closet, economically speaking. Just some advice to our fellow humans.
....and he was trying to turn his posting history around...
And of course anyone doing even the most preliminary research into you understands why you were chosen to write this particle article and why you've worded it in the manner in which you have...
You Have Voted, and He is the Hottest Gay Journalist in New York
In a very close second, with 21% of the votes, is New York Daily News derring-doer Chris Rovzar
More like derriere doing Chris Rovzar.
I had never thought of it that way before.
For the VK ping list!
particle = particular
See, if you oppose the homosexual political agenda or even just major parts of it, you are a “Gay-hating” person.
It is like talking to a two year old.
LOL, troll got an ‘atta boy’ from the guy I pinged over on another thread using the words “I like the cut of your jib, mate”.
Emotionally, many homosexuals ARE two year olds.
The latest talking point homosexuals use is the one of ‘civil rights’ where they equate what they do in the bedroom and in public in San Fran with race.
So they’ve been using the ‘racism’ card against people who rightly state that homosexuality is deviancy.
Faggots and dykes are welcome, as if that will gain these guys a few votes. When a Party has no Principles, it's no longer a Party, but just a bunch of politicians whose only purpose in life is to buy peoples' votes with other peoples' money to keep their jobs.
I know. From now on, that saying is going to have a special, “festive” meaning for me. :)
“Jibba Jabba” *wincing*
Hey! You stay away from other people’s jibs! ;-)
Someone want to enlighten me on what the hell is up with Breitbart?
After stalwart conservative chops from the belly of the beast, looks like he is off the tracks.