Palin: No 'problem' with gay group at CPAC

The Hill ^ | 10 Feb 2011 | Michael O'Brien

[Notary Sojac]

"People are losing their jobs; they're losing homes. We're still engaged in a war," she said. "There are so many life-changing, life-and-death issues out there in front of us. You know, we'd better be concentrating on what is really important here"

Sounds like something Mitch Daniels would say, eh what??

[Huck]

If she keeps talking like this, she’ll get banned from FR.

[Notary Sojac]

I am SO waiting for Palin to come out with a public statement that sounds like it is clearly pandering to gay conservatives. The skull shrapnel on FR should be a sight to behold.

[MEGoody]

Gee, Sarah Palin believes in freedom of speech? Who would have thunk it?

[Pan_Yan]

[dforest]

Actually that is quite close to what Daniels said on the Laura Ingraham Show about 10 days ago.

[Huck]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uv_WGEHr4I

[Durus]

You aren't stating that you actually want FReepers to get upset are you? Or do you just desire us to be upset at Palin? Or is it the topic that you gleefully anticipate creating a division among conservatives?

[xjcsa]

Truly conservative queers are about as plentiful as truly moderate muslims.

Speaking of which, the Muslim Brotherhood's infiltration of CPAC via David Keene and Grover Norquist is the *real* reason to stay away, in my view.

[unseen1]

Isn’t it nice to have a leader that is not a hypocrite and sticks with her principles. Palin is a constitutional conservative that agrees ALL citizens have the rights of that document not just the ones we find socially acceptable. This is the only way to get the government out of the 50/50 rut it is in. Federalism, local control, freedom of association. This is what is needed to win massive mandates to move your aganda through.

[sand lake bar]

“Roh, roh!”

[Le Chien Rouge]

I’d like to know what the ‘gay’ republicans stance on conservative issues are, especially:

1) Taxes
2) Government Spending
3) Abortion
4) War on Terror
5) Marriage

If they want to attend, big deal. They are a small group anyway.

[Notary Sojac]

I’d just like to see Palin treated like any other potential candidate. Pluses, and minuses.

[altura]

She doesn’t need to come out with that kind of statement.

All she has to do is mildly indicate that gays are entitled to life, liberty and happiness and certain heads explode around here.

[Responsibility2nd]

I am SO waiting for Palin to come out with a public statement that sounds like it is clearly pandering to gay conservatives. The skull shrapnel on FR should be a sight to behold.

I like Sarah Palin. I do. But with a statement like this...

 

"I don't have a problem with different, diverse groups that are involved in political discourse, and having a convention to talk about what the answers are to their problems that face America," Palin said Wednesday on Fox News when asked about GOProud.

 

I think you're right. She is moving to the left socially.

[altura]

But Palin is not any other candidate.

She’s The One.

(not being sarcastic, really think so)

[dforest]

The division was created by the GOP (Grand Old Poofters).

The real story here is that the party has been taken over by the homo agenda.

Social conservatives get the shaft once again.

[altura]

So you’re saying that you do have a problem with diverse groups within the Republican party being able to speak and address issues?

That’s moving left?

I can’t imagine where on the left/right spectrum you must be... hanging off the edge at the right, I guess.

[Bigtigermike]

You’re going to be waiting a long time then because she is not going to pander to them, she has not pandered to the GOP Establishment or the Media like the rest of the potentials. She just said she has no problem for them participating and let people decide for themselves. We dint need to act like liberals