Posted on 02/10/2011 8:23:00 PM PST by DesertRenegade
If your choice is the Heritage Foundation or GOProud, it should be a very easy one.
Wondering if Cardenas will invite his good friend Charlie Crist to speak at the next CPAC.
Cardenas gets it.
“For the past six months, we have watched as unfair and untrue attacks have been leveled against our organization, our allies, our friends and sometimes even their families. Everyone has their breaking point and clearly in my interview with Metro Weekly I had reached mine.”
Que the diva.
Ronald Reagan: “Society has always regarded marital love as a sacred expression of the bond between a man and a woman. (...) We will resist the efforts of some to obtain government endorsement of homosexuality.”
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/002344.html
Balkanization of the conservative movement helps...how?
Lots of big egos that demand to be stroked I’m thinkin’...
Blah, blah, blah ......
Typical leftist infiltrator pretending to be a conservative and hoping to spark a "paradigm shift" in the conservative movement. In other words, trying to co-opt the movement and make it much less conservative.
I hope so.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
A wee bit late. Give me a few years to sort them out.
Homosexual movement can NEVER be conservative unless they put themselves back into the closet and quit trying to condition kids into thinking their behavior is normal. It goes against Natural Law Theory which presupposes a Supreme Being and is the basis of common sense.
By endorsing the behavior, they say the Bible is wrong. What is conservative about rewriting the Bible to make behaviors that have always been dysfunctional and demeaning and damaging to the body a good?
It is cultural Marxism to destroy the family and Christianity. Marxist ideology is not compatible with our Constitution.
They are fools to accept the pavlovian conditioning of the constant media promotion and lies....ya...homosexuality is healthy (puke)...homosexuality is life affirming (puke).... Ya all you are doing is feeding your children cognitive dissonance and creating little atheist hedonists, because if there is no sexual morality (which is what the homosexual agenda wants) then you get every type of abnormal disgusting behavior and there is no reason to say that is “wrong” either.
They should heed the sane words of a non-Marxist: Erotic paradise is an illusion when you untie the bows of restraint; Shattered egos, shattered bodies , and shattered minds...
This is what happens when we take reason and logic out of our government and legal system. You get Alice in Wonderland world....but it will look like the homosexual Weimar Republic pretty soon and we will also be begging for a Hitler.
He can't keep that in the closet.
Society has always regarded marital love as a sacred expression of the bond between a man and a woman. It is the means by which families are created and society itself is extended into the future. In the Judeo-Christian tradition it is the means by which husband and wife participate with God in the creation of a new human life. It is for these reasons, among others, that our society has always sought to protect this unique relationship. In part the erosion of these values has given way to a celebration of forms of expression most reject. We will resist the efforts of some to obtain government endorsement of homosexuality.
--Ronald Reagan, July 12, 1984.
Was Cardenas against the conservative Rubio?
That's what got the homosexuals infil(thy)trating CPAC.
Attract Conservatives, and who cares what the nationality is.
Pandering to the “diversity” angle is ridiculous.
You gotta know it's seeking the illegal alien insurgent criminal colonist's votes.
Instead of doing that, fix the broken fraudulent voting system.
They keep saying the same thing about the teaparties, and all the ones I've been to the majority of them were attended by those not of the white persuasion far more represented than their percentage in the population.
Sorry about the sentence structure, I'm in a late time zone.
Yup, he was.
For Crist.
Kinda like Christie was for the RINO running against the tea party candidate O’Donnell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.