To: indylindy
You are very welcome. Palin’s judgment is at stake here.
She has to show what side she is on before conservatives commit to her.
26 posted on
02/12/2011 4:49:53 PM PST by
Liz
To: Liz
Unfortunatley Liz, many don’t seem to care. Denial is much more comfortable.
31 posted on
02/12/2011 4:53:49 PM PST by
dforest
To: Liz
[She has to show what side she is on before conservatives commit to her.]
She showed independence from the establishment toadies at CPAC, an ability to buck the tide. What is wrong with that? Don’t write about her if she is so washed up and can’t win.
50 posted on
02/12/2011 5:09:38 PM PST by
DaxtonBrown
(HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
To: Liz
If Eisenberg wasn’t Jewish, would you still be trashing Palin?
51 posted on
02/12/2011 5:10:07 PM PST by
jimbo123
To: Liz
People like you who micro-analyze and criticize every move Sarah Palin makes but pay no attention what other potential nominees say and do are getting very tiresome.
66 posted on
02/12/2011 5:23:27 PM PST by
bwc2221
("")
To: Liz
People like you who micro-analyze and criticize every move Sarah Palin makes but pay no attention what other potential nominees say and do are getting very tiresome.
67 posted on
02/12/2011 5:23:57 PM PST by
bwc2221
("")
To: Liz
"She has to show what side she is on before conservatives commit to her." What else does she have to do to show "what side she is on" in your feeble mind?? Have you read her books?? Her positions couldn't be much plainer.
To: Liz
She has to show what side she is on before conservatives commit to her.That might be the dumbest post this year. If you don't know what side she's on then your judgment is in doubt. Maybe come election day you should just stay in and do your nails.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson