Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phila. homeowner wins judgment against Wells Fargo over mortgage fees
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | February 15th 2011 | Jeff Gelles

Posted on 02/15/2011 6:15:48 PM PST by Cardhu

's not clear how this story will turn out, but right now Patrick Rodgers is living a pay-back fantasy probably shared by millions of struggling U.S. homeowners.

Frustrated by a dispute with Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and by his inability to get answers to questions, the West Philadelphia homeowner took the mortgage company to court last fall.

When Wells Fargo still didn't respond, Rodgers got a $1,000 default judgment against it for failing to answer his formal questions, as required by a federal law called the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

And when the mortgage company didn't pay - does something sound familiar? - Rodgers turned to Philadelphia's sheriff.

The result: At least for the moment, the contents of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, 1341 N. Delaware Ave., are scheduled for sheriff's sale on March 4 to satisfy the judgment and pay about $200 for court and sheriff's costs.

Rodgers has even written his own headline: "Philadelphia homeowner 'forecloses' on Wells Fargo."

Has he really? Not quite. But Rodgers, who lives in the city's Wynnefield Heights section, won at least a momentary upper hand in a fight with Wells Fargo that began nearly two years ago.

Before you leap to conclusions, let's get a few things straight.

Rodgers isn't unemployed, or a deadbeat. He's a music promoter who owns Dancing Ferret Concerts - if industrial, electronic, or goth is your sound, maybe you've been to one of his gigs. He says he's paid all he owes under the terms of his seven-year-old mortgage.

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judgement; mortgage; wellsfargo
"...his insurer delivered troubling news: His homeowners premium would more than double, because Wells Fargo was insisting that he insure the home's full replacement value - about $1 million worth of coverage, the insurer told him."
1 posted on 02/15/2011 6:16:02 PM PST by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Good for Patrick Rodgers. It’s WAY past time that people started taking on unfair practices by the Banking Industry!


2 posted on 02/15/2011 6:18:01 PM PST by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Good for Patrick Rodgers. It’s WAY past time that people started taking on unfair practices by the Banking Industry!


3 posted on 02/15/2011 6:18:34 PM PST by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

I agree with you - they took on the wrong guy.


4 posted on 02/15/2011 6:21:21 PM PST by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Good for him. Hope he collects every dime.


5 posted on 02/15/2011 6:21:21 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
He refused to renew the higher-cost policy. Instead, Wells Fargo bought him so-called forced-placement insurance - a policy that typically costs much more than ordinary coverage

There we go. Try three to four times as much you'd pay if you shop around. "Forced placement coverage" is the insurance company's equivalent of a DWI towing charge -- only slightly higher than the highest charge you could possibly find on your own under the worst of circumstances. I was wondering what relatively easy to implement, widely applicable scam WF had pulled here.

6 posted on 02/15/2011 6:26:47 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Goliath meet David. And his trusty rock.


7 posted on 02/15/2011 6:26:47 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

From what I have read, loans and re-financing by the Banks are totally unavailable to the home-owners.
“Underwater” homes are being vacated all over the country - and the banks are now “OWNING” a very large percentage of realestate. Where is this leading?


8 posted on 02/15/2011 6:27:33 PM PST by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

How many ferrets can dance on a Wells Fargo pinhead spokesman?


9 posted on 02/15/2011 6:28:36 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

What a great story.
I’d like to attend this auction.


10 posted on 02/15/2011 6:31:29 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Good. Why does Wells Fargo think it can flout the law.


11 posted on 02/15/2011 6:32:59 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

“Why does Wells Fargo think it can flout the law.”

because they have flouted the law for years and gotten away with it.


12 posted on 02/15/2011 6:36:11 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

As I understand it as long as these mortgages are on the books at the loan value the bank’s assets stay the same. But if the value is lowered through a deal or through a foreclosure then sold for less money the banks have to show a loss. That’s why they won’t negotiate.

I can’t say I totally blame people who are walking away. Businesses do it all the time. And why make payment for something that will never be paid for? The banks took just as big a risk as the buyer when they “bet” the homes would stay the same or go up in value. The opposite happened.


13 posted on 02/15/2011 6:37:23 PM PST by Terry Mross (We need a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

And, don’t forget the FEDS reinforcing their scheming, manipulating ways, with bail outs


14 posted on 02/15/2011 6:38:23 PM PST by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

The banks took a ‘risk’ (a HUGE risk) when they started giving unsecured home loans - with NO collateral.

When I bought my first home, I had to put up my FIRST born as collateral, along with all future earnings I may secure.

I took every penny out of WFB when they started giving credit cards and mortgages to illegal immigrants. I told the president of the bank at that time, that I didn’t want my money in their bank, when they folded as a result of that FOOLISH decision.

Of course they denied it - but it was already all over the news and periodicals - and not too many said a word.

(Thanks, Bawney Fwank!)


15 posted on 02/15/2011 6:43:41 PM PST by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

He’s a music promoter and the $9,000 for the unwanted insurance policy plus whatever legal costs he’s incurred likely is well worth the notoriety and likely the cheapest publicity he’s ever purchased. But for a normal person, I’d imagine the more prudent thing would be to simply seek another mortgage company which would be more responsive.


16 posted on 02/15/2011 7:31:19 PM PST by kingu (Legislators should read what they write!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yorkie; Terry Mross

Also don’t forgot how these banks are dumping the toxic loans onto the taxpayers the same big global banks that backed obama he left the door wide open they unload them through the GSE’s. I don’t blame many of the people either and with the MERS mess I wouldn’t blame others for walking away. Who would want to pay for 30 years and then not have a clear title.

A bunch of crooks at those banks they knowing sold those loans as AAA to investors, have a pension fund, 401K invested in a MBS? This has affected millions and to add insult to injury we were forced to bail them out no one bailed out the investors. Yet we do not see perp walks. Individuals aren’t the only one’s suing them either Allstate, MBIA, Blackrock even the NY Fed is suing for put backs. Good I hope a lot more do the same.


17 posted on 02/15/2011 7:38:10 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

banks don’t care.

the bail out allows them to carry 15-20% defaults vs the previous model of only 3% defaults.

The forclosure mess will be all profit for the banks.


18 posted on 02/16/2011 7:07:02 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Bump for suing banks (especially Wells Fargo/ASC)!!


19 posted on 02/18/2011 9:03:49 AM PST by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson