Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High-Capacity Ammo Clips for Guns Save Lives
usnews.com ^ | 14 February, 2011 | Chris Cox

Posted on 02/16/2011 3:41:11 AM PST by marktwain

Since the senseless January 8 attack on Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and her innocent constituents, NRA members have joined our fellow Americans in offering thoughts and prayers for the victims, for their families, and for the Tucson community. Click here to find out more!

Yet while we grieved, anti-Second Amendment groups worked to exploit the tragedy to resurrect their political agendas. "In the wake of these kind of incidents, the trick is to move quickly," one antigun activist said.

[See which members of Congress get the most money from gun control groups.]

High on their wish list is banning ammunition magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. This failed ban was in effect from 1994 to 2004; bills in Congress would bring it back and make it even more restrictive on honest citizens. These magazines are standard equipment for handguns and other firearms owned by tens of millions of Americans, just as they were before and during the earlier ban. Besides using them for self-defense, gun owners own them for competitive or recreational shooting, as key parts of collectible firearms, and for other lawful purposes.

In a letter to her colleagues, New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy made the claim (echoed in countless newspaper editorials) that "The only purpose for the existence of these devices is to be able to shoot as many people as possible as quickly as possible." Yet even her bill would allow law enforcement officers—who obviously carry guns to protect themselves and the public, not for mass murder—to continue to acquire and possess these magazines. The bill would also allow magazines to be transferred to police officers upon retirement, even though a retired officer's right to use firearms for self-defense is the same as any other private citizen's. [Read the U.S. News debate on "open carry" gun laws.]

Why do honest Americans—private citizens and police alike—choose magazines that hold more than 10 rounds? Quite simply, they improve good people's odds in defensive situations. Contrary to what the public sees in the movies, criminals are not always stopped when struck by a single bullet, or even multiple shots. And one third of aggravated assaults and robberies involve more than one assailant, according to the Justice Department's Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Ask yourself: How many rounds would you want to have on hand if you knew you were going to be attacked tomorrow, but didn't know how many attackers you'd face, whether they might be on drugs, or whether you'd have time to reload? [Take the U.S. News poll: Should more Congressman carry guns for protection?]

The earlier ban was proven a failure. A congressionally mandated study released in March 1997 found that the banned weapons and magazines "were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders." The study also "failed to produce any evidence that the ban reduced the number of victims per gun homicide incident" and found that "the average number of gunshot wounds per victim [about two] did not decrease" after the ban.

Since the ban expired in 2004, the nation's murder rate has dropped 10 percent, continuing a long-term decline that began in 1991. Through 2009, the murder rate is at a 45-year low, and the FBI recently reported that it fell an additional 7 percent in the first half of 2010. Mayor Nutter's city, unfortunately, has lagged far behind the rest of America, with a murder rate that returned to early '90s levels in recent years. While Philadelphia politicians call for gun control, nearly two thirds of violent-crime defendants in Philadelphia over a recent three-year period avoided conviction. [Read more about gun control and gun rights.]

Antigun activists ask, "Who needs these magazines?" Good Americans—police and private citizens—do. Good Americans must always be able to choose the tools that will give them the best chance of surviving in the worst situations.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; capacity; giffords; government; magazine
The government does not get to decide what I need.
1 posted on 02/16/2011 3:41:18 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The People’s Republic of New Jersey was quick to jump on the band wagon !

New Jersey: Another Anti-Gun Bill Introduced in Trenton

Assembly Bill 3807, sponsored by Assemblyman Louis D. Greenwald (D-6) and Assemblyman Annette Quijano (D-20), has been introduced in the New Jersey Assembly. If passed, A3807 would reduce the maximum capacity of ammunition magazines to 10 rounds from 15. This legislation is an example of yet another attempt to restrict the rights of law-abiding citizens, while doing nothing to actually combat crime.

As of now, the language for the bill has not been released and a hearing has not been scheduled, but the NRA will continue to update you on the status of the legislation as it progresses through the New Jersey General Assembly. So, please continue to check your e-mail and www.NRAILA.org for updates.


2 posted on 02/16/2011 3:49:23 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
to our idiotic friends in the media....lets call these magazines....

these are clips.


3 posted on 02/16/2011 3:54:52 AM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade
Mr Christie, who is about as conservative as can be expected from a governor from NJ....will be a RINO and sign this bill....

.....thus eliminating himself from Presidential contention....and he probably doesn't even get it.

4 posted on 02/16/2011 3:57:57 AM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

They also believe that cement = concrete.

It is in the style manual, there fore it is correct


5 posted on 02/16/2011 4:00:57 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bert
They also believe that cement = concrete.

It is in the style manual, there fore it is correct

Therefore I should be able to correctly write Sally used rubber concrete to attach the laminate to the counter top.

6 posted on 02/16/2011 4:31:39 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I think outlawing ‘common sense legislation’ would go a long way to protecting our freedoms and financial security.


7 posted on 02/16/2011 4:48:31 AM PST by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Thx for that! Not sure why the concept is so difficult. You’d think they’d be informed esp since they’re reporting on it. Then again the public in general isn’t all that bright either.


8 posted on 02/16/2011 6:01:57 AM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I agree with everything Chris Cox wrote. And I agree with you that the government does not get to decide what we each need.

But I’m a little old-fashioned in my preparations for self-defense. My concealed-carry handgun is a 1911 chambered in .45 ACP with a 7-round magazine. My primary home-defense long gun is a Remington 870P with a blued receiver, walnut stock, and the original 4-round magazine (I like the balance of the standard magazine; I keep it loaded with 3” magnum 15-pellet 00 buckshot).

For a Homeland Defense Rifle, I have a U.S.G.I M1 Garand, (Springfield Armory 1954, with all original parts except for new springs) which holds an 8-round clip of .30-06 M2 Ball ammo.

I know there are many excellent modern firearms available, but I’ll take my chances with these three.


9 posted on 02/16/2011 8:46:11 AM PST by 04-Bravo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson