Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

.223 Remington vs. 5.56 NATO: What You Don’t Know Could Hurt You
Human Events ^ | 02/15/2011 | Richard Johnson

Posted on 02/21/2011 7:37:41 PM PST by neverdem

Is firing a 5.56 NATO cartridge in your .223 Remington chambered AR15 dangerous? Or do Internet forum-ninjas and ammunition companies selling you commercial ammo instead of surplus overstate the dangers? Believe it or not, a real danger exists, and some gun owners who think they are doing the right thing may not be safe.

The Cartridges

The .223 Remington and 5.56x45 NATO cartridges are very similar, and externally appear the same. But there are some differences that lie beneath the surface.

The 5.56 case has thicker walls to handle higher pressures, meaning the interior volume of the case is smaller than that of a .223. This will alter the loading data used when reloading 5.56 brass to .223 specs.

Some 5.56 loads have a slightly longer overall length than commercial .223 loads.

The Chambers

The significant difference between the .223 Rem and 5.56 NATO lies in the rifles, rather than the cartridges themselves. Both the .223 and 5.56 rounds will chamber in rifles designed for either cartridge, but the critical component, leade, will be different in each rifle.

The leade is the area of the barrel in front of the chamber prior to where the rifling begins. This is where the loaded bullet is located when a cartridge is chambered. The leade is frequently called the “throat.”

On a .223 Remington spec rifle, the leade will be 0.085”. This is the standard described by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute, Inc. (SAAMI). The leade in a 5.56 NATO spec rifle is 0.162”, or almost double the leade of the .223 rifle.

A shorter leade in a SAAMI spec rifle creates a situation where the bullet in a 5.56 NATO round, when chambered, can contact the rifling prior to being fired. By having contact with the rifling prematurely (at the moment of firing), chamber pressure can be dramatically increased, creating the danger of a ruptured case or other cartridge/gun failure.

The reverse situation, a .223 Rem round in a 5.56 NATO gun, isn’t dangerous. The leade is longer, so a slight loss in velocity and accuracy may be experienced, but there is not a danger of increased pressures and subsequent catastrophic failure.

How serious is the danger of firing 5.56 ammo in .223 guns? Dangerous enough that the SAAMI lists 5.56 military ammo as being not for use in .223 firearms in the technical data sheet titled “Unsafe Firearm-Ammunition Combinations.”

ATK, the parent company of ammunition manufacturers Federal Cartridge Company and Speer, published a bulletin entitled “The Difference Between 223 Rem and 5.56 Military Cartridges.” In this bulletin, ATK stated using 5.56 ammo in a .223 rifle could result in “…primer pocket gas leaks, blown cartridge case heads, and gun functioning issues.”

However, the danger may be lower than SAAMI or ATK suggest. In Technical Note #74 from ArmaLite, the company states “millions of rounds of NATO ammunition have been fired safely in Eagle Arms and ArmaLite’s® SAAMI chambers over the past 22 years,” and they have not had any catastrophic failures.

According to ArmaLite:

“Occasionally a non-standard round (of generally imported) ammunition will fit too tightly in the leade, and resistance to early bullet movement can cause elevated chamber pressures. These pressures are revealed by overly flattened primers or by powder stains around the primer that reveal leaking gasses.”

What Do You Have?

So, if you own a rifle chambered for the .223 for 5.56, do you know for which caliber it is really chambered?

Many match rifles are chambered in .223 Remington (SAAMI specs) for tighter tolerances, and theoretically better accuracy.

Many of the AR-15’s currently sold on the market are made for the 5.56 NATO cartridge. If you own one of these, you should be fine with any .223 or 5.56 ammunition.

However, ATK dropped this bomb in the bulletin on the .223/5.56:

“It is our understanding that commercially available AR15’s and M16’s – although some are stamped 5.56 Rem on the receiver – are manufactured with .223 chambers.”

So, even if your AR is stamped 5.56, is it really? Check your owner’s manual or call the company directly and make sure you get an answer you feel comfortable with.

As if the confusion regarding the .223 vs 5.56 chambers wasn’t enough, there is a third possibility in the mix, that is being used by at least one major manufacturer. The .223 Wylde chamber is a modified SAAMI-spec .223 chamber that allows for the safe use of 5.56 NATO rounds, but maintains tighter tolerances for better accuracy.

Yeah, yeah… What’s the bottom line?

Here’s the bottom line. If you want to follow the safest possible course, always shoot .223 Remington ammunition. The .223 Rem cartridge will safely shoot in any rifle chambered for the .223 or 5.56.

If you want to shoot 5.56 NATO rounds, make sure you have a rifle designed for the 5.56 military cartridge. Shooting 5.56 in a normal .223 Rem rifle can result in bad things.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 223remington; 556nato; ar15; arfcom; banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Cobra64
I tried reloading some .223 brass (after firing from the 5.56 chamber) but it didn't group as well the NATO brass. Still, having the option is much better than not having it. I'll gladly use .223 to take out zombies at 50 yards, where the accuracy difference doesn’t amount to much.
41 posted on 02/21/2011 9:30:03 PM PST by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

Even better:
Mosin-Nagant -> 7.62x54R caliber.


42 posted on 02/21/2011 9:30:51 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chode

My Remington bolt action “Police Special” has a
.308 chamber with a tight throat. You can’t
safely shoot a 7.62x51 NATO in it. There are
headspacing issues between the two specs.


43 posted on 02/21/2011 9:33:56 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
For an AR-15 it doesn't matter what the RECEIVER says.

Check the stampings on the BARREL.

Rock River Arms is known for using the Wylde chamber in their varmint rifles.

AR15 Chambers (pdf file)

44 posted on 02/21/2011 9:43:16 PM PST by smokingfrog ( BORN free - taxed to DEATH (and beyond) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50cal Smokepole

I agree, and was also aware of the accuracy issue. I bought this weapon for a training class in order to be comfortable and capable of “running the gun” should a serious situation arise.


45 posted on 02/21/2011 9:48:32 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Pretty simple, just trim your cases to specification to be sure you have no head space problems and work your loads up before trying to go for maximum velocity and watch for pressure problems before they occur. You can also check for case internal volume by measuring before you reload your cases to look for case wall thickness affects before setting up your specific load. I have found that the commercial Winchester brass loads pretty much the same as their military brass and the same as Lake City brass. Stay away from the Federal brass.


46 posted on 02/21/2011 9:50:36 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Even better: Mosin-Nagant -> 7.62x54R caliber.

Oh, yeah. Gotta love those Mosins! I'm down to only 5 of them, because friends keep buying them from me.

I think they're too lazy to clean the cosmo off, so they go for mine. LOL.

47 posted on 02/22/2011 12:55:02 AM PST by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Lots of foolish stuff posted here, there is no difference in the two rounds military brass is made thicker for shelf life and refurbishing. The two round, military verse civilian, shoot different because of bullet size and bullet crimping. The 223 civilian is more a varmint load. The original ar15’s were chambered in 222 which was a Remington round, rather than buy rights to use the round, the up sized it a hair and changed the neck slope. So a 223 is a fancy 222:, if you get any deformed brass from shooting it will be an over-sized chamber 99% of the time. The military rifle also has a different barrel twist that the civilian, that also will cause a difference in accuracy.
48 posted on 02/22/2011 3:01:55 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 50cal Smokepole

Thanks for the ping 50!! Good article.


49 posted on 02/22/2011 3:35:53 AM PST by davetex (All my weapons got melted by a meteor!! No Sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump


50 posted on 02/22/2011 4:35:19 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
it's a Lapua .338 magnum
51 posted on 02/22/2011 4:42:28 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
then you can't shoot national match ammo??? damn
52 posted on 02/22/2011 4:44:50 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“It is our understanding that commercially available AR15’s and M16’s – although some are stamped 5.56 Rem on the receiver – are manufactured with .223 chambers.”

Knew something like that was coming, was surprised how far down the page I had to read to find it.

Basic rule of precision consumer-market manufacturing: Do whatever’s cheapest or easiest, eh?. How many of our technologically/numerically illiterate customers are gonna discover or understand the difference?


53 posted on 02/22/2011 6:55:55 AM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

My original Colt AR-15 is marked .223, but I know it will shoot 5.56 NATO rounds easily. I’ve put several thousand through it including ball, SS-109 and tracer.


54 posted on 02/22/2011 7:26:56 AM PST by CholeraJoe ("And if you disagree with me, you are worse than Hitler." Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

While some of this is true, the important factor is head space in the barrel and the bolt. An improperly head spaced barrel/bolt for 5.56 is just as dangerous as a .223 with 5.56mm in it.

Bottom line is that any AR owner knows (or should) that they need to spend time measuring their parts if they assemble it themselves, check the head space, and the leade. Most completed guns are already head spaced in the factory and are set for 5.56.

Service parts are an issue that needs to be considered in an AR type rifle. A matched set barrel/bolt is significantly more expensive than either of the parts individually. Not that setting the headspace is that difficlut, and the gauge block is $15 or $20. Obviously, too long can be corrected (shaved to meet the spec), too short is dangerous and hard to determine even with the gauge.


55 posted on 02/22/2011 8:57:48 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

They are one and the same. There is no difference.


56 posted on 02/22/2011 9:05:50 AM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Chode
The ammo has to be Winchester .308 on the box. A 7.62x51 NATO doesn't fit flush into the chamber on the PSS model. I have some T/C Encore barrels that might be OK. I had to put my box of 7.62x51 NATO away until I have something with a proper chamber.

The converse problem with putting .308 into a 7.62x51 NATO chamber is too much headspace. It might not fire reliably with the case head not resting properly on the bolt face. Gas may well escape around the shoulder of the brass too.

I reload my own .308 with the 100 gr Speer "Plinker" for punching paper targets. Less recoil, good accuracy and total control of the cartridge dimensions.

57 posted on 02/22/2011 9:49:58 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

If you buy a top of the line Bushmaster or Colt from the factory set up the way you want it in the 5.56 it will be perfectly on the money. If you spend half as much and get a knock off AR you have no idea about headspace or where the parts came from. Bottom line is step up and spend $1,200 - $1,900 for a top grade weapon.

Our M-4 Bushmaster has matchgrade barrel and trigger and is stamped 5.56 on the barrel and the receiver. .223 in this weapon is not very accurate however when we use Lake City or Federal 109’s in 55 grain FMJ or 62 grain tracers we get a 2 inch group at 200 yards. Again this is what you get when you buy from the factory set up the way you want it.

If you want an off the shelf weapon get an Ak.


58 posted on 02/22/2011 10:10:34 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

That’s why I am suspicious of this article’s premise.


59 posted on 02/22/2011 10:49:56 AM PST by CholeraJoe ("And if you disagree with me, you are worse than Hitler." Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Had a FReeper here tell me that he didn’t know anything about a ‘leade’ and .223 vs 5.56mm cautions because he’d never seen anything about it. I sent him a treatise on this very subject as a lesson. Never heard a word back from him.


60 posted on 02/22/2011 10:52:06 AM PST by Gaffer (A Democrat is an animal that escaped extinction from the 'big dinosaur-killer' event.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson