I’m not making this a racial thing, so I’m going to leave it there. Anglos, however defined - and I think Scots would be included in the demographer’s use of the term, probably even Lapps/Sami, have as much right to assert themselves in Texas as anyone else, including Hispanics with American citizenship. Illegal aliens don’t, whether they’re Hispanics in Texas or French Canadians in New England. That’s basically all I was saying.
Demographers are having to bend to the DNA findings.
My implicit point was that as hispanics get enough money their most assertive and well-off young men will be picked off by the shiksas.
That has happened so repeatedly throughout American history that only an idiot would discount it.
Once digging through some history about Herkimer New York where the Dutch, Scandinavians and Germans all attended the same "Old Yellow Church" during the American Revolution, I discovered that after 100 years of living cheek to jowl NONE of the Dutch families had intermarried with the German families. That was roughly 1800.
The issue was slavery ~ the Dutch kept slaves but the Germans didn't.
Now I know for a fact that those people ultimately got over their problems else I wouldn't be here (for just a tiny bit of the old'gene pool), but once slavery was abolished in New York and the trouble makers moved off to Kentucky, the boys and girls got down on the farm!
Culture follows the home!