Skip to comments.Abortion is safer than having a baby, doctors say (UK)
Posted on 02/27/2011 1:53:28 PM PST by surroundedbyblue
The advice, which would be given to women considering terminations, has caused anger, with anti-abortion campaigners accusing doctors' leaders of forcing an "absurdly liberal agenda" on women in a vulnerable situation.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
A cursory examination of various abortion clinic websites in the U.S. would reveal that they are already peddling this bullcrap propaganda to American women. Just sick. These bloodthirsty people will stoop to any level.
I picked up a bumper sticker at church today, “God is Pro-Life”.
That was my first thought... safer for who?
The socialist UK nannystate at its best. Theses bastards are nuts!
FReak - safer even then that would be not creating life. - and then killing it.
You are all crazy! It IS safer! If every pregnant woman got an abortion, within 100 years or so, there would be NO MORE DEATHS AT ALL, let alone deaths from child births.
I knew they would find an answer to keep people from getting old and dying. Now I know what it is. Abortion. Stop all births and sooner or later, you stop all deaths.
Let the babies vote on this!
Back in 1976, a saleslady from Planned Parenthood came to talk to my biology class in high school. A big part of her sales pitch was to insist that abortion is “perfectly safe,” and to stress the dangers of using contraceptives or having live babies.
IOW, there is nothing new about this claim. It is just one aspect of a multifaceted hard sell of abortion.
And so what if children ARE dangerous. Everyone has forgotten why people were created to have children in the first place, thinking it some Darwinian accident.
I bet that breast cancer risk was completely ignored.
Better to get an abortion than to have your partner use a condom? While neither is, ahem, “ideal,” what industrial strength Kool-Aid has PP been downing by the barrel?
Not getting pregnant at 15 and 16 and 17 is even safer.
Safer for the mom, maybe.
And easier, for sure.
But still wrong.
Until your bedsores are infected with staph and you are EATEN ALIVE...eaten alive...
No, the abortion advocates completely ignore all research showing links between having an abortion and later having an elevated risk of breast cancer. The Susan Komen Foundation denies any links and refuses to fund any research on this subject.
It also reaches a point where a leftists in a state literally must seize control of children or cease to exist.
Leftists, left to their own devices breed at far less than replacement level. They are a dead end.
Now that is just silly. They have ME (and ALL of YOU) to stand in their stead!
If we don't, what does that really say about us?
There are no doubt many involved in the abortion industry that sincerely but mistakenly believe that they are doing good work. But I sometimes suspect that there is a core that simply gets off on the "killing" part, and has found a safe place to indulge it, and will offer any absurd justification to keep it.
Yeah, except for the breast cancer and the life long depression.
pro-abortion propaganda ping!
I forgot the other aspect of the sales pitch. She also stressed how likely contraceptives are to fail, with the implication that they are SO likely to fail, there isn't much point in using them.
The whole goal of PP is to make obscene profit, by whatever means possible.
Another unpublicized risk of abortion is to future children. Women are warned not to smoke during pregnancy, because of the danger to the fetus (some die, others have low birth weight which puts them at greater chance of dying within the first year after birth). A past abortion is just as dangerous as smoking--but unlike smoking, there is nothing to do to mitigate the risk.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
A companion article to the one just pinged out by wagglebee, and TigersEye has a long list of useful links about the evils of abortion.
Here’s the other article:
British Doctors Told to Advise Women Abortion Safer Than Giving Birth
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Bingo. Comments people with big families get, in public, range from "Don't you know how that happens?" and "What's the matter, your TV broken?" As if children are some kind of unwanted side effect from sex.
Just for the record, immobility/inactivity for a fairly
short period has definite health risks.
But go ahead and act like two year old. It fits you quite well.
Literal I am, literal I will be. It has its benefits
and its risks also.
NOT SAFER FOR THE BABY!
It’s not safe for the baby, that’s for sure.