Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: 58% support govít shutdown rather than current spending levels
Hotair ^ | 02/28/2011 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/28/2011 9:48:56 AM PST by SeekAndFind

If Congressional Republicans need a little spine-stiffener in the budget battle, Rasmussen provides just the tonic. This poll question differs from the earlier survey by The Hill on the question of a government shutdown. Rather than focus on blame, Rasmussen instead asked about priorities in the debate over spending, and clearly the priority of the majority of likely voters isn’t continued government operations:

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 33% of Likely U.S. Voters would rather have Congress avoid a government shutdown by authorizing spending at the same levels as last year. Fifty-eight percent (58%) says it’s better to have a partial shutdown until Democrats and Republicans can agree on what spending to cut. …

The partisan differences are striking. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Democrats prefer avoiding a shutdown by going with current spending levels. But 80% of Republicans — and 59% of voters not affiliated with either major party — think a shutdown is a better option until the two sides can agree on spending cuts.

Dave Weigel says that the results come from the wording and order of the questions, with the central question coming after four questions set the table:

So before someone is asked whether he supports a shutdown, he is told that the shutdown will not affect Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment benefits; he is not told what other services “could be” shut down. He’s told that there are three options — authorize spending at the same levels as last year, authorize less spending than last year, or authorize more spending than last year, but then he’s told that the shutdown will be avoided “by authorizing spending at the same levels as last year.” But no one is proposing* spending at the same levels as last year. The CR we’re talking about is one that Republicans in the House supported first and the Democratic Senate is grudgingly accepting. I’m not sure how useful this poll is for gauging possible support for a shutdown.

Actually, Harry Reid proposed a 30-day CR at current spending levels last week to put off the impasse another month and avoid a government shutdown:

The top Democrat in the Senate said Tuesday that he’ll bring legislation to the floor next week to keep the government running at current spending levels for 30 days to avoid a shutdown in March.

As for the rest of Dave’s criticism, the shutdown won’t stop SSA, Medicare, and unemployment checks; that spending is mandated and will continue. It’s hard to tweak Dave for that, though, when even the President can’t get that one right. So far no one is really sure what kinds of discretionary-funded services will have to stop, either; the military will likely stay on the job, for instance, as will intelligence operations. So if Dave is complaining that Rasmussen prepped the question by giving out accurate information about the budget impasse, point taken, but that hardly seems like a fatal flaw in the poll.

The internals of the poll are interesting as well, but hardly surprising. Independents, who swung hard to the GOP in the midterms, would prefer a government shutdown to continuing the same level of spending by more than a 2-1 margin, 59/36, and Republicans 80/14. Moderates (self-described) prefer a shutdown 52/39. A majority of Democrats want the government to remain in operation, but only by 58/36, indicating a serious divide within their party. However, both Republicans and independents narrowly say that a shutdown would be bad for the American economy, 36/35 and 37/33 respectively.

Voters in every age and gender demographic would choose a shutdown rather than current levels of spending. Only voters earning more than $100K a year choose to keep spending at current levels rather than risking a shutdown. Perhaps most telling, 56% of government workers would rather see a shutdown than continued spending at current levels.

As I noted earlier, Republicans have a big advantage in this debate. Democrats risk alienating almost every imaginable constituency except the political class (14/76) in bucking the spending cuts.

Update: Oh, look — here’s another Democrat demanding current levels of spending:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is showing no enthusiasm for the new proposal from Republicans to avoid a government shutdown …

Pelosi said in a statement that the GOP’s plan for a two-week spending bill cuts funding for critical programs.

“Republicans want to cut an additional $4 billion, which includes stripping support for some pressing educational challenges without redirecting these critical resources to meet the educational needs of our children,” Pelosi said in a statement. “This is not a good place to start.”

In other words, Pelosi wants cuts that then turn around and get spent on something else.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budgetdeficit; governmentshutdown; rasmussen; spending

1 posted on 02/28/2011 9:49:01 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Where did Pelosi’s airplane go?

How was she able to demand and get funding for it? By what law?


2 posted on 02/28/2011 9:54:04 AM PST by Mr. K (Job #1 is to DEFUND THE LEFT~!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It was depressing to see earlier polls showing people didn’t support spending cuts or a government shutdown but this poll gives me some hope. Other polls on spending, entitlements and the size of government didn’t ask the questions right. This is the way the question should be asked. Don’t say it in a vaccum—give responders a choice. Are you willing to take a shutdown to get spending cut?


3 posted on 02/28/2011 9:54:42 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("The time will come when Winter will ask you what you were doing all Summer" -- Henry Clay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

“Only voters earning more than $100K a year choose to keep spending at current levels rather than risking a shutdown”

Interesting. Evidently the government isn’t for the little people but the big people.

Shut ‘er down!


4 posted on 02/28/2011 10:00:04 AM PST by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Mathematically, they NEED to cut spending.
I would argue that in accordance with the Constitutional concept of limited government, they NEED to cut spending.
If the poll shows 58% of the people want spending cuts, then in the name of their electoral future, they NEED to cut spending.

What does it say about the Republicans that they are faced with a $1.6T deficit, and they can only muster a $104B cut???

5 posted on 02/28/2011 10:00:08 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

might be nice if that 58% were voters..half the people i talk to don’t vote


6 posted on 02/28/2011 10:01:43 AM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
What does it say about the Republicans that they are faced with a $1.6T deficit, and they can only muster a $104B cut???

It says that there are only three months left in this fiscal year to make cuts and that the majority of the current budget has already been spent. I expect the first full FY budget to contain the needed cuts, and so should every conservative.

7 posted on 02/28/2011 10:03:12 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The atmosphere in the country is very different to 1995. The elected Republicans should take note and sturdy their spines.


8 posted on 02/28/2011 10:04:09 AM PST by Merciful_Friend (http://www.cinchreview.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It won’t seem that way when the MSM gets done. They might even be able sway the sheeple to Democrat side.


9 posted on 02/28/2011 10:22:42 AM PST by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Heading, with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Once again the polls prove that our legislators just do not listen to us.


10 posted on 02/28/2011 10:25:46 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
half the people i talk to don’t vote

That sounds like an opportunity. You might take some of them to McDonalds for lunch and go armed with the information that will convince them that the future of our country depends on their voting out the usurper. Oh, and take along some voter registration forms.

11 posted on 02/28/2011 10:44:24 AM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This message was already sent last November. Rino’s have a hard time comprehending that though.


12 posted on 02/28/2011 11:23:15 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

According to the Rasmussen poll, these were voters...


13 posted on 02/28/2011 10:54:05 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson