Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New IRS rule might mean tax break for same-sex couples
The Sacramento Bee ^ | Feb. 24, 2011 | CLAUDIA BUCK

Posted on 03/06/2011 9:28:05 AM PST by Salman

SACRAMENTO, Calif -- SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Many same-sex couples are getting a tax break this year from the IRS, according to new requirements to report their combined income on federal tax returns.

Under "income splitting," the IRS is requiring all same-sex married couples or registered domestic partners in Washington state, California and Nevada to divide their combined income equally and report it on their separate tax returns.

For some couples, it will mean more money in their 2010 refund; for others, they'll pay more in taxes.

Either way, the change is significant, both monetarily and emotionally, officials of Lambda Legal, the national gay and lesbian legal rights group, said Tuesday in a conference call with reporters.

Peter Renn, a Los Angeles-based Lambda attorney, hailed the new IRS requirement as a money-saver for many same-sex couples, as well as another step to "move the ball forward" in recognizing their rights.

Those who will save the most are same-sex couples with the biggest disparities in income. For instance, a couple where one earns $100,000 and the other is a stay-at-home spouse with little or no income, will split their combined community earnings on their individual tax returns, with each reporting $50,000 in income. The result: an overall lower tax bill for both.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gays; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; incometax; irs; orientationjustice; orificediversity
Never mind equal "marriage rights", now it's Federal subsidies for it.
1 posted on 03/06/2011 9:28:08 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salman

“Registered domestic partners.” Sounds kinda Communist to me.


2 posted on 03/06/2011 9:33:41 AM PST by wastedyears (It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

If it means reduced federal spending, anything that reduces the amount of cash going to the feds is a good thing.


3 posted on 03/06/2011 9:33:48 AM PST by Little Pharma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
For some couples, it will mean more money in their 2010 refund; for others, they'll pay more in taxes.

Imagine that, more of that there blind justice, all are created equal, political directive stuff again, eh?

Why don't they just cut to the case and fund roadside bulletin boards that state "Vote democrat and qualify for a discount".

4 posted on 03/06/2011 9:34:41 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

I guess we’ll just have to be fair about it.

No more filing joint returns for anybody.


5 posted on 03/06/2011 9:47:33 AM PST by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Now, how is the IRS going to verify the accuraccy of these returns???

There won’t be any supporting paperwork, no W-2’s, no mortgage statements, no dividend records, no medical bills tying out to the amount on the returns.

It’s open season for fraud and unreported income.


6 posted on 03/06/2011 9:49:23 AM PST by Noob1999 (Loose Lips Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Ping!


7 posted on 03/06/2011 9:49:28 AM PST by Spunky (Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

How do you prove you’re gay?


8 posted on 03/06/2011 9:50:20 AM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Same-sex couples, being childless mostly, deserve more than just the tax breaks that families-with-kids enjoy. They deserve all the incidental benefits too: someone to visit them and take them to dinner on holidays, someone to care for them in old age, someone to take their last name, someone to remember them when they’re gone. So, let’s propose a new federal law mandating all of those things for same-sex couples.

And since same-sex couples earn more on average (I believe) than opposite-sex couples, let’s tax the same-sex couples for the difference, and distribute it.

/ sarc


9 posted on 03/06/2011 9:51:06 AM PST by Tax Government (Democrat: "I'm driving to Socialism at 95 mph." Republican: "Observe the speed limit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Yep - and the MSM wants conservatives to throw grandpa under the Social Security Bus for this????


10 posted on 03/06/2011 9:51:25 AM PST by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
When the government wants something to happen, they give tax credits.

They want the gay vote, so they're considering doing this.
11 posted on 03/06/2011 9:52:32 AM PST by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Just one more example of how Kalifornicate is enabling that degenerate, depraved percentage of the population. In Kalifornicate, it’s OK TO BE GAY and we’ll give you a tax break to boot!

That state is utterly lost and their disease is spreading to the rest of this country.


12 posted on 03/06/2011 9:52:50 AM PST by NWFLConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
How do you prove you’re gay?

Someone tells you you were born that way, and then you say to other people, "That guy over there said so."

13 posted on 03/06/2011 9:55:22 AM PST by Tax Government (Democrat: "I'm driving to Socialism at 95 mph." Republican: "Observe the speed limit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
How do you prove you’re gay?


14 posted on 03/06/2011 9:57:06 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
How do you prove you’re gay?

That is going to be one disturbing audit.

"Right here, on the desk. IRS regulations require it."

Tax preparers such as Guy Crouch, a Sacramento CPA who does 75 or 80 tax returns a year for same-sex couples,

Guy Crouch? Did someone just trick the newspaper with a made up name for a gay porn star for this story?

A little more seriously, how does the IRS just make rules for this? It seems like the definition of marriage for federal tax purposes would be determined by Congress instead of just some bureaucrat in the IRS building.

15 posted on 03/06/2011 10:02:08 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Do they also suffer the marriage penalty?


16 posted on 03/06/2011 10:03:09 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


17 posted on 03/06/2011 10:04:46 AM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; Fred; Chattering Class of 58; SeattleBruce; tarator; 21twelve; Feasor13; matt1234; ...
Thanks to Spunky for the ping.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket Say WA? Evergreen State ping

Quick link: WA State Board

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

18 posted on 03/06/2011 10:09:37 AM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salman
That's nice.

The Sodomy Subsidy.

19 posted on 03/06/2011 10:10:30 AM PST by Dr. Sheldon Cooper (I am one lab accident away from being a super-villian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

And the Kenyan ape wants to raise our taxes to subsidize tax breaks for the fags?


20 posted on 03/06/2011 10:28:41 AM PST by TXConservative25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
How do you prove you’re gay?

There are so many bad jokes that come to mind, and none of them suitable for this forum.

21 posted on 03/06/2011 12:26:05 PM PST by Hardastarboard (Bringing children to America without immigration documents is child abuse. Let's end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salman; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

The fact that our country (actually the ruling leftist and RINO-leftist-lite elites) are shoving the homo-nazi agenda on everyone is a very bad sign. Our Republic will only work based on moral absolutes; it will not function with a sick and depraved population or promoting depraved immorality as a public standard. It just won't work. Rough waters ahead.

22 posted on 03/06/2011 12:57:27 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman
How exactly does the IRS have the authority to do this?

Congress needs to get to the bottom of this and someone should be called on the carpet for usurping the authority of the House....

23 posted on 03/06/2011 1:24:39 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

OMG. Your photo post is hysterical. Had to go back to find the tower!!!.....


24 posted on 03/06/2011 1:50:04 PM PST by Little Pharma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The people who wanted conservatives “out of their bedroom” now want the feds crawling all over their bedroom.

Wonder how they’ll feel about registering & having to show their papers?


25 posted on 03/06/2011 2:28:23 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative

I’m in complete agreement with your assessment of California’s political landscape, but keep in mind that this is a push by the socialists/anarchists in the White House to promote perversion through the federal tax code. Perverts in Nevada and Washington, as community property states, and states that don’t recognize same-sex “marriage,” will also be allowed to split incomes.

It is just a very small step, after DADT is fully implemented, to mandating this nationwide.


26 posted on 03/07/2011 10:21:07 AM PST by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salman
A Federal subsidy? Some will pay MORE in taxes, some less. That's not much of a subsidy...

What we see here is a scam: one is paying taxes on income that wasn't theirs and another is not! I don't care if they are "registered domestic partners" or what: if required to file separately they should pay tax on what each alone earned. Under what legislative mandate is IRS allowed or required to make this rule change?

Even heterosexual married couples can file separately which is not often beneficial but if one might be hiding income it offer protection.

It reminds me of the scam that is RUBS (ratio utility billing system) for apts and condos: you pay a calculated proportion of a whole rather than what you actually used. Those who conserve, subsidise the wasters! When we were transitioned to RUBS from pay-for-use our water bill rose 70%.

27 posted on 03/07/2011 3:14:15 PM PST by newzjunkey (AB80 moves CA presidential primary to June, why bother voting?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson