Posted on 03/08/2011 3:56:10 AM PST by abb
winnah!!!
“But the company [NYT] has struggled to make enough money from its digital operations to stem the decline in print advertising ...”
Well, naturally, anyone with a lick of sense knows that it will be impossible to replace print advertising revenues with digital revenues for any print media operation for a plethora of reasons, but mostly because the Internet broke the print media’s publication monopolies, with subscription revenues approaching zero, as well as bringing down the revenue per ad from thousands of dollars to tiny fractions of cents, and in one important case, namely Craigslist, ads are outright free.
The monopoly print media dinosaurs are doomed, and that’s a good thing. A very good thing. Because most have simply become propaganda organs for the Socialist Democrats and the neo-Marxist “progressives”.
> Two Rather Half-Assed Men
That adds up to a complete ass.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/3/8/rich-journalism-goldsmith-crimson/
Frank Rich Discusses Modern Journalism
BTW, Burkett claims he burned the original documents after he faxed them. Anybody else believe that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.