Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter King Supported the IRA Before Hunting for Terrorists
National Journal ^ | March 9, 2011 | Elspeth Reeve

Posted on 03/09/2011 1:50:08 PM PST by WilliamIII

Before Rep. Peter King was holding hearings into why American Muslims aren't doing enough to stop terrorism, he was cheering on the IRA and absolving them of "moral blame" for their terrorism. In the 1980s and 1990s, King unequivocally supported the militant Northern Irish group despite its history of killing civilians, speaking at protests staged by Noraid, which the U.S. government claimed funneled guns and money to the IRA.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ira; islam; islamism; jihad; king; noraid; peterking; stealthjihad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Renderofveils

“First they ban smoking in Irish pubs, then grant honorary knighthood to a murdering pig that never understood the concept of honor. Way to go, England.”

The Republic of Ireland isn’t under English or British jurisdiction and has been as independent of the Westminster government for over seven decades.

They banned smoking in pubs before ANYWHERE in the United Kingdom did it. Blair got the idea from the Irish, not the other way round.


41 posted on 03/09/2011 2:55:11 PM PST by MalPearce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
Did Peter King ever renounce his earlier support for the terrorist scum in the IRA?.. Just because he is on to something now regarding Islamic terrorism does not mean that his earlier actions should be forgiven, not least if there is no repentence...."

I completely agree with you and would prefer him to do so. But I do allow for a possibility that he is undergoing a change. Perhaps it will ultimately lead to what you and I would like to see --- repentance and renouncination, and not merely a change of mind.

42 posted on 03/09/2011 2:56:57 PM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sport

It IS true, as has been known for a long time.


43 posted on 03/09/2011 3:19:18 PM PST by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn
I heard one time that the Kennedys were/are big IRA supporters also. But none the less, we will now begin to know everything bad there is to know about King.

I do not believe that the IRA are a bunch of nice guys. I believe that they are a bunch of killers and murderers. I also believe that they and the muslims have a marriage of conveince so far as killing people goes.

I do know that this would have never been made public with King if he had not gone after the muslims.

44 posted on 03/09/2011 3:38:49 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

And the leftists supported slavery, segregation, lynchings, Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot.

So what’s your point, commie?


45 posted on 03/09/2011 3:40:39 PM PST by sergeantdave (The democrat party is a seditious organization and must be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Looks like the press found something that the King and Ted Kennedy could agree on to beat him up with. Interesting how such support never matters with liberals.

As far as the IRA goes, I can't support any of their crap. You'll be noticin' though, how quickly they came around after 9/11, when the real enemy to our civilization was pointed out to them rather grapically. I recall thinking at the time that their rapid stand-down was quite remarkable.

46 posted on 03/09/2011 6:36:07 PM PST by zeugma (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport

No doubt, this has been highlighted because of King’s stance on the hearings.


47 posted on 03/09/2011 9:13:00 PM PST by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

who are you calling a commie, bub.

The IRA was in league with the communists. Anybody who supported the IRA deserves to be shamed, including Congressjerk King.

i think this is a legitimate news story. Couldn’t the GOP find somebody to lead the anti-terrorism committee who wasn’t a supporter of terrorists?


48 posted on 03/10/2011 4:05:20 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Let me explain FR posting etiquette to you.

As the OP of this thread, posts directed to you are aimed at the news story, article, opinion piece, etc. that you posted - not to you personally.

Capisce?


49 posted on 03/10/2011 4:29:03 PM PST by sergeantdave (The democrat party is a seditious organization and must be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Help me to understand the comparisons and contrasts.

Was the IRA fighting a civil war with the British for separation, or where they exporting terrorism globally to all countries they entered in order to dominate and subjugate?

-PJ

50 posted on 03/10/2011 4:39:14 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (In a democracy, you negotiate from the floor of the legislature, not from hideouts and bullhorns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

The IRA targeted civilians. That’s the definition of terrorism. They bombed pubs and hotels. almost killed Thatcher at one hotel. Terrorism is a tactic - and IRA practiced terrorism. Sounds like you want to excuse the tactic of terrorism when practiced by the IRA murderers. Situational ethics - usually I associate that with liberals.


51 posted on 03/10/2011 5:09:47 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
It depends.

Sherman burned Atlanta.

The Nazis bombed London. Allied forces bombed Dresden.

The USA dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

These were attacks on civilians. Were they terrorism or acts of war between defined combatants?

That's why I asked for clarification. I recall that the IRA was not uniformed, but they were organized and limited their actions to the British in a stated grievance and conflict, although perhaps not in a legal state of war.

What is the comparison and/or contrast with Islamic jihad? That's all I'm asking.

-PJ

52 posted on 03/10/2011 6:05:40 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (In a democracy, you negotiate from the floor of the legislature, not from hideouts and bullhorns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Murdered an American tourist when they bombed Harrods in 1983.


53 posted on 03/20/2011 1:57:40 PM PDT by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Peter Vollmer

No, they just murdered an American in 1983 in London when they bombed Harrods.

And so what if they never bombed America?. Neither have Hamas, Hezbollah or the PLO or Baader Meinhof, but youd agree they were/are all terrorists?.


54 posted on 03/20/2011 2:00:16 PM PDT by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hondact200

The IRA bombed and killed British servicemen in Germany and murdered two Aussies in Holland because they ‘looked British’. They were also famously stopped by the SAS from setting off THAT bomb in Gibraltar.


55 posted on 03/20/2011 2:04:28 PM PDT by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson