Skip to comments.Is this what you want YOUR five-year-old learning about sex? Explicit materials cleared for schools
Posted on 03/10/2011 9:18:24 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction
Explicit cartoons, films and books have been cleared for use to teach sex education to schoolchildren as young as five.
A disturbing dossier exposes a wide range of graphic resources recommended for primary school lessons.
The shocking material promoted by local councils and even the BBC teaches youngsters about adult language and sexual intercourse.
Among the books singled out in the report is How Did I Begin? by Mick Manning and Brita Granstrom which has a cartoon image of a couple in bed in an intimate embrace.
It is accompanied by an explanation using frank and adult terminology of the act of intercourse.
Another, called The Primary School Sex And Relationships Education Pack by HIT UK, includes material to allow children aged five to 11 to learn about different sexual positions and prostitution.
The BBC has been highlighted for an educational video featuring full frontal nudity, while its learning resources department, BBC Active, shows computer-generated images of male genitalia.
All the material has been recommended by councils for use at ages seven-plus.
The dossier, compiled by the Christian Institute, also pinpoints a book called Lets Talk About Sex, by Robie H Harris, which includes a chapter on heterosexuality called Straight and Gay.
Furious family campaigners have described the material as too much, too young and warn it will encourage sexualisation.
Mike Judge, of the Christian Institute, said: The current approach to sex education demands ever more explicit sex education at ever younger ages.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“How Did I Begin”
Clearly this cannot stand as gays cannot do this and it is prejudiced against them and must stop.
when my son was about 5 yrs old, he asked me that horrible question...”Mommy, where do babies come from?”. We were eating lunch at a Dog and Suds drive in and I was caught completely off guard. My answer? “Tucemcari New Mexico. They have a baby factory down there, just cranks out babies day and night, eat your french fries.”
My step niece was pregnant at the time and a few months later he asked again. I calmly told him that a mommy has an egg and a daddy has a seed and when the seed fertilizes the egg it makes a baby. He asked why this girls tummy was getting so big so I told him the baby was in there growing. This adorable child looks at me in horror and says, “She ate the baby?”.
This is why 5 yr old children do not need “explicit sex education”. They are just not equipped to deal with that information.
Dick: Hey, Jane, let’s try what we learned in class today...
Sex education for children is utter nonsense! They might as well demand sex education for dogs, cats, rabbits, and all animals at the zoo! What rubbish!
Your first answer to your son was FANTASTIC. :) And great point, by the way, agreed.
Same with abortion. Try to explain abortion to a small child and bar none, they are horrified. I recently stepped very lightly into the subject out of necessity (my 10 year old heard the word mentioned on TV news) and even my gentle explanation was met with abject shock. Just like with other issues such as racism, they have to be taught that which is contrary to what is divinely written on their hearts.
Great stories! LOL!
What’s even more disgusting are the comments by the Brits who think this is perfectly acceptable.
I saw that. They seem to think that more and earlier sex education is going to solve their teen pregnancy problem. Good luck with that, I’d say!
Sex education which goes into detail for children younger than 11 or so is all to sexualize the children and destroy sexual morality. You can never teach sex in group scenario, by strangers, to promote moral actions in public schools where they do not separate sexes. It destroys respect and privacy of the body. Promotes orgies and group sex. (It is what they want—chaos and destruction of the family unit with importance of mother and father.)
Their classes remove morality from the sex act. It teaches children that there is nothing special about the sex act....no beauty, no mystery, nothing special about it. It reduces sex to animal acts that has no morality attached to it. They remove the life-creating meaning of sex because they promote every abnormal act as being equal to any other sex act. (marxist lie)
Children try to do whatever they see adults do...it is natural—that is why you protect the minds of young children so they will not be bothered with thinking about that which they cannot emotionally or physically understand yet. It is why you don’t tell them the details of the Nazi holocaust.
Why? It destroys children’s natural curiosity, makes them explore things which would never happen in nature unless they are emotionally and physically abused.
It is the Marxist ideology that reduces man into nothing special but an animal. Sex education reduces the sex act to animal act. This is to destroy the Christian paradigm which creates the idea of individuality and specialness so that they are not easily herded and told what to think and do.
Destroying sexual morality is the easiest way for Marxists to destroy the family unit which they loathe because loyalty is diverted from the state.
That country is so warp that I’m actually cheering the Muslims. I hope they destroy ever last leftist.
I will personally kill any leftist caught sexually molesting a child.
What I have to say is for the STILL unaware Americans!
We’re about done and Khrushchev apparently delivered. If we don’t reverse everything Communist and 0b0z0id in ‘12, our great Republic will be toast. Read and weep!
From the Communist Goals (1963):
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
Pardon me, I don’t mean to hijack the thread. While you’re reading the provided URL, look at what’s happening in Wisconsin and other states according to the item below from the same Communist Goals (1963):
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [”]united force[”] to solve economic, political or social problems.
That is absolutely true. My 11 year-old daughter looked at me aghast when I had to do the same thing (again, a reference on t.v.). Her eyes were as wide as saucers. She couldn't believe a woman could do such a thing.
There are still members of my family (not immediate family, thank goodness) that think it's just fine for homo's to be able to adopt. The communists haven't won, yet but they're still working on it.
The in-practice components --- required norms of decent behavior, meaning, affectivity, relationship skills, marriage, and importance of goodness, love, faith and family --- are taught over a lifetime. We got the moral-life part while studying the Commandments, the Sacraments, Great Books, Virtues and Vices, and the Lives of the Saints.
Meanwhile, I noticed my state (TN) was mandating "AIDS Awareness" for the 7th and 8th graders int he public schools. Why would ANYYBODY want to teach kids a disease-centered curriculum?
Stumbled upon a book I remembered from the ‘60s: None Dare Call It Treason by John Stormer. Seems he’s written a 25 year update. Amazing read. There are, folks, communists everywhere and it’s amazing to me this nation has lasted as long as it has....