Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China, The Next Superpower?
IBD Editorials ^ | March 10, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 03/10/2011 4:27:40 PM PST by Kaslin

Supremacy: As Beijing resumes double-digit increases in military spending, a leading think tank projects China will achieve military parity in less than a generation. We'd better practice our bows.

Back in 1907, President Teddy Roosevelt sent what became known as the Great White Fleet on a worldwide excursion that lasted almost 14 months. Four U.S. naval squadrons, consisting of four battleships each and their escorts, demonstrated America's arrival as a great power that would soon pass Britain as ruler of the waves.

Then, the passing of the torch from one great power to another was peacefully presaged by a seemingly small display of sea power. The next great shift may soon be upon us, and the next great superpower may not be so protective of democracy and freedom.

In its Global Military Balance report, the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) warns that China's growing economic power is forming the basis for a strategic shift in the global military balance of power.

IISS director general John Chapman told Reuters after the report's release on Tuesday that if current trends continue, it would take only 15 to 20 years for China to achieve military parity with the United States. Considering that we seem to be going in different directions, Beijing should soon pass us.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: appeasement; china; defense; disarmament; ibd; military; obamalateral; surrender

1 posted on 03/10/2011 4:27:41 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama is doing all he can to make it happen.


2 posted on 03/10/2011 4:28:23 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The next?? Haven’t they been for some time?


3 posted on 03/10/2011 4:29:04 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
The next?? Haven’t they been for some time?

Like minds.

4 posted on 03/10/2011 4:30:00 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well yes, but what does Justin Beiber think?

/s


5 posted on 03/10/2011 4:31:40 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Then, the passing of the torch from one great power to another was peacefully presaged by a seemingly small display of sea power. The next great shift may soon be upon us, and the next great superpower may not be so protective of democracy and freedom.

Worrying about the peace and freedom of other nations while neglecting our own is what helped get us in our present fix. If China wants to bear the weight of being the world's superpower then more power to them. The American taxpayer and military could use a break after 70 years.

6 posted on 03/10/2011 4:35:40 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

China reminds me of that vaudeville act where a person is spinning many, many plates on long sticks.

The hard part isn’t to keep the plates spinning — it is not to trip and fall.

China has over a billion people and they’re expecting a payoff for all those years of hard work and self denial. If the Chinese government stumbles, or there is a string of multi-year crop failures, or the Chinese economy collapses, watch out!


7 posted on 03/10/2011 4:39:02 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama wants to cripple the US, but not himself in the bargain. He will soon have to decide what his next step will be.
8 posted on 03/10/2011 4:43:39 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They have a day-to-day supply of fuel and coal.
95% of their population lives in dirt poverty.
They just killed a generation of women.
They just suffered a massive crop failure.
Their government is still centralized.
They have built millions of unoccupied housing units as make-work projects.
They fix their prices by decree of central government.
Corruption is systemic.
They hold notes to a whole bunch of US debt, which doesn’t look like a good idea for the future.

Aside from those little details, they’re awesome.


9 posted on 03/10/2011 4:46:09 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9

I’m waiting for Charlie Sheen, Kathy Griffin and Lady Gaga to chime in.


10 posted on 03/10/2011 4:53:33 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; 70th Division; ...

Ping


11 posted on 03/10/2011 5:06:07 PM PST by raptor22 (Join me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks Kaslin.
Back in 1907, President Teddy Roosevelt sent what became known as the Great White Fleet on a worldwide excursion that lasted almost 14 months. Four U.S. naval squadrons, consisting of four battleships each and their escorts, demonstrated America's arrival as a great power that would soon pass Britain as ruler of the waves.
Somewhere around here a few years back there were nice photogs of the GWF steaming through the Straits of Magellan. Very cool.


12 posted on 03/10/2011 5:27:49 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not to worry. They will have carriers and carrier-killing missiles and anti-satellite missiles - but that’s nothing.

We will have an INCLUSIVE, PROHOMO MILITARY. Haha! Take THAT.


13 posted on 03/10/2011 5:40:32 PM PST by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Typical response from an American voter:

“China will be the next superpower? What does that m... Hey! America Idol`s on!


14 posted on 03/10/2011 5:53:08 PM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
The true opiate of the masses.

Idle American loves American Idol.

15 posted on 03/10/2011 6:03:45 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/4/4f/20090804140114!Anticommunist_Logo.png

Communism NEVER works,not even when the god like Chinese do it. I am not saying they are not dangerous, but it simply doesn't work.

16 posted on 03/10/2011 7:58:33 PM PST by KC_Lion (America is on the Brink of War with itself, and no one seems to notice or care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"As we have warned repeatedly, China's blue water has arrived"

I used to respect IBD.

For them to let this ignorance fly under their banner is downright embarrassing for them.

17 posted on 03/10/2011 9:11:49 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The Chinese leadership is plenty capable of ruling through massive famines. As long as the party cadres are fed and well armed the people can’t do anything. Despite advances in telecommunications China remains a very closed country.


18 posted on 03/10/2011 11:01:42 PM PST by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded

Yeah, but superpowers aren’t generally a ‘closed country’.

China has had opportunities to expand phenomenally beyond its comfort zone, and has not done so. Every time, they’ve pulled back, almost as though they’re afraid...of what? That China itself will be changed by exposure to outsiders?


19 posted on 03/10/2011 11:12:56 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lurk

LOL!!

It’s what I’ve been saying...they aren’t exactly in a the position of a world power to be feared.


20 posted on 03/10/2011 11:15:24 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lurk
Aside from those little details, they’re awesome.

Your list is embellished a bit.

But let me give you a list that isn't embellished at all.

China consumes more cement than the rest of the world combined. As a reference, China will soon consume 2 billion tons/yr whereas the US consumes roughly 100 millions tons/yr.

China is now the largest auto producing and consuming nation in the world. And the gap will only widen.

China consumed more energy than the US in 2009 and will likely be twice as much by 2030 (I'm betting more than twice).

China is embarking on a program to build larger commercil aircrafts. So is Russia, Japan, Canada, and possibly Brazil. Boeing and Airbus have the most confidence in a China because of her sheer market size.

There are more nuclear reactors under construction in China than the rest of the world combined.

China's freeway system is nearly as extensive as the US. By 2030, is expected to be twice the freeway of the US as measured in Milege.

Shanghai's subway system (one of many cities) is currently the largest and soon will have more subway mileage just in Shanghai than all the subway lines in all the cities in Japan combined.

And I could give you a further list of items that end with "est" in regards to what China is building or producing. But I think you get my point.

21 posted on 03/11/2011 10:01:32 PM PST by ponder life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
Communism NEVER works,not even when the god like Chinese do it. I am not saying they are not dangerous, but it simply doesn't work.

I agree with your statement that communism never works (in fact, I believe it is simply a concept that 'works' in college papers and comic books). Totally agree. However, my question is this ...what makes you believe that China is Communist? In fact, I would say that since 1978 China has not been a true Communist country (stemming from the economic reforms of Deng Xiaoping), and since the mid-90s that trasmission from Communism to 'socialism with Chinese characteristics' to 'economic Capitalism with Chinese characteristics and central rule' have even accelerated. Actually, looking at Chinese economic history, the 'Communism' aspect is actually quite small! Apart from the period from 1949 to 1977 (when Mao's collectivist Communism gutted that nation) China's economy has actually been quite dynamic going back centuries. It is only that 1949-1977/8 period that Maoism decided to ravage the place.

Anyways, I would not call China Communist (I believe the phrase 'Red China' may be as relevant as 'Duchy of Prussia'). Many economists call the shift from Communist Central Economic Planning to what the Chinese currently have a 'Socialist Market Economy,' where you have a Capitalist Market Economy with a strong centralized political core. Some have said it is basically a form of Capitalism controlled by Oligarchs (kind of the Russian economy, but on steroids). Others, more cynical (but probably the most correct), call their economic system Fascist (which may have some truth, if you consider fascism to be an authoritative single-state nationalist control with strong corporatist systems and values).

Personally, I simply consider the Chinese system to be a hybrid, whereby you have a strong Capitalist periphery that is utilized for pragmatic purposes, surrounding an inner core that espouses strong nationalism and adherence to a central controlling political nexus. It has worked out quite well for them, however they still have a good number of (potentially large) issues to deal with. It remains to be seen how well they manage those issues going forward.

However, one thing they are not is Communist.

22 posted on 03/29/2011 4:23:42 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson