Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NPR Videos Are Not What They Seem
Accuracy in Media ^ | 3/13/11 | Accuracy in Media

Posted on 03/13/2011 8:45:25 AM PDT by Nachum

It looks like James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas may have some ‘splaining to do after an analysis by The Blaze reveals some selective editing of the recently released NPR videos. The most damning video was the one where now former NPR executive Ron Schiller was quoted as calling the Tea Partiers as racists. However a further look at the raw footage shows that Schiller was actually discussing what an Republican Ambassador was saying.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jamesokeefe; not; npr; videos; what
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Cough, cough... can't see... someone ... blowing too... much... cough cough.... .... smoke
1 posted on 03/13/2011 8:45:27 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What do Dems think of the Blaze as it is affiliated with both Glenn Beck and the Huffington Post. Quite the conundrum for liberals eh?


2 posted on 03/13/2011 8:47:30 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Nachum: great minds ... here’s another article about this smoke-screen:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2688090/posts


3 posted on 03/13/2011 8:50:15 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

At least now we know what it takes for AIM to engage in some serious in-depth analysis.


4 posted on 03/13/2011 8:52:04 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
However a further look at the raw footage shows that Schiller was actually discussing what an Republican Ambassador was saying.

Okay, okay. You got 'im. Go ahead and take the money.

5 posted on 03/13/2011 8:53:35 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Reading the comments:

Joe Y:

“I have to disagree with you on your analysis. He says the “Republican(s)” voted for Obama because of the “Tea Party people.”

Not possible. The Tea Party movement didn’t begin until well after Obama took office. The “Republican(s)” would have voted against McCain, a moderate Republican who they would surely have been symapthetic with.

Outside of Palin, there was little in the way of conservative voice in that campaign, but Schiller claims the ambassador said, “…they think the current Republican party is not really the Republican Party. It’s been hijacked by this group…” Yet, Schiller never mentions Palin, and there was no Tea Party at the time, i.e. no “group” tht could have “hijacked” the McCain campaign.

Furthermore, Schiller refers specifically to the Tea Party in his description, and the Tea Party could not possilbly–not possibly–have been part of the conversation to which Schiller refers. No, when Schiller speaks, he’s giving his own evaluation.”

OldJoe:

“Let me get this straight, the Republicans…..”an ambassador — so, a very highly placed Republican — another person, who was one of the top donors to the Republican party.”, both voted for Obama because they knew about Tea Party which had not formed in November 2008?”

Rex:

“Let me get this straight, he repeated what he alledgedly heard from two republicans in order to support an opinion that he did not hold? That doesn’t sound accurate to me. That sounds like left wing spin.”


6 posted on 03/13/2011 8:54:43 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot (How much better off would we be if these bastards would just leave us alone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I didn’t know that the folks over at AIM could cogently write while entertaining gerbils into their back doors. I am impressed.


7 posted on 03/13/2011 8:54:43 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

O’Keefe released the entire raw video.

Besides the worst bigotry was when the NPR thug said that the Jews owned the media.


8 posted on 03/13/2011 8:56:16 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Then Shiller should have fought it. But he didn’t. So, I have to believe that there is truth in the video. :)


9 posted on 03/13/2011 8:56:39 AM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The entire, unedited video was released along with the condensed version.

When does CPB/NPR/state-run media ever do that?

10 posted on 03/13/2011 8:59:28 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There were 2 commies on CNN just now trying to claim NPR is not Liberal. Pathetic.


11 posted on 03/13/2011 9:01:34 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

It would be interesting to see if there are Journolist emails on this Okeef attack.


12 posted on 03/13/2011 9:02:46 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

what is a “Republican Ambassador”?


13 posted on 03/13/2011 9:06:56 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Ha! JournoList indeed ...

Time Magazine continues with their own contrail plumes of Journolisto smoke...

The Twisty, Bent Truth
of the NPR-Sting

http://tunedin.blogs.time.com/2011/03/13/the-twisty-bent-truth-of-the-npr-sting-video/


14 posted on 03/13/2011 9:07:14 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ok, then why did he quit?


15 posted on 03/13/2011 9:08:18 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’m glad to see Glenn’s site STANDING WITH THE TRUTH... which, has NO agenda.


16 posted on 03/13/2011 9:09:12 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
what is a “Republican Ambassador”?

I think it's the same thing as a straw dog or a red herring or a Unicorn. Something made up out of whole cloth.

If this mythical "Republican Ambassador" really existed, why doesn't National Palestinian Radio (their own words for their network according to Schiller) name him?

When have they ever shied away from identifying Republicans whom they want to embarrass?

17 posted on 03/13/2011 9:10:00 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

That is twisted, and I’m ashamed at myself for finding it so funny.


18 posted on 03/13/2011 9:21:19 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

“At least now we know what it takes for AIM to engage in some serious in-depth analysis.”

Fairly startling, isn’t it? AIM started the whole media watchdog business from a conservative perspective. They were eclipsed years ago, first by Bozell and now Breitbart, so are probably busy trying to stay relevant.


19 posted on 03/13/2011 9:24:58 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“Let me get this straight, the Republicans…..”an ambassador — so, a very highly placed Republican — another person, who was one of the top donors to the Republican party.”, both voted for Obama because they knew about Tea Party which had not formed in November 2008?”

Oops. Try again, Accuracy In Media.

20 posted on 03/13/2011 9:28:50 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson