Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.R.A. Declines to Meet With Obama on Gun Policy
New York Times ^ | March 15, 2011 | JACKIE CALMES

Posted on 03/15/2011 4:36:58 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

More than two months after the Tucson shootings, the administration is calling together both the gun lobby and gun safety groups to find common ground. But President Obama has no plans to take the lead in proposing further gun control legislation, aides say, and the nation’s major gun rights group is snubbing the invitation.

On Tuesday, officials at the Justice Department will meet with gun control advocates in the first of what will be a series of meetings over the next two weeks with people on different sides of the issue, including law enforcement, retailers and manufacturers, to seek agreement on possible legislative or administrative actions.

The effort follows Mr. Obama’s call, in a column on Sunday in a Tucson newspaper, to put aside “stale policy debates” and begin “a new discussion” on ways to better enforce and strengthen existing laws to keep mentally unstable, violent and criminal people from getting guns.

But the National Rifle Association, for decades the most formidable force against proposals to limit gun sales or ownership, is refusing to join the discussion — possibly dooming it from the start, given the lobby’s clout with both parties in Congress. Administration officials had indicated they expected that the group would be represented at a meeting, perhaps on Friday.

“Why should I or the N.R.A. go sit down with a group of people that have spent a lifetime trying to destroy the Second Amendment in the United States?” said Wayne LaPierre, the longtime chief executive of the National Rifle Association.

He named Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has almost no role in gun-related policies, and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; fubo; guncontrol; gunregistration; molonlabe; nra; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Second Amendment First

The NRA are very politically savvy, as this maneuver proves. Nearly any other person or organization would be gaga over the opportunity to sit down with the President of the United States, even if they thought it would hurt their cause.

I supported the NRA during the last election when they endorsed pro-2nd Amendment Democrats.

Now it’s time to see if this strategy pays off. I’ll eat my words if it doesn’t, but I expect to rub it in everyone’s face who claimed that they renounced their membership if many NRA-backed Democrats join the Republicans in putting a stop to this.


21 posted on 03/15/2011 5:04:41 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzybutt

Lets face facts, if you are a Democrat (COMMUNIST) at this point in history you are either too ignorant or too evil to tolerate, and I do not hear you.

Well said, great line!


22 posted on 03/15/2011 5:06:41 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (That Beck guy was right about gold, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fuzzybutt
Lets face facts, if you are a Democrat at this point in history you are either too ignorant or too evil to tolerate...

You left off just plain stupid.

23 posted on 03/15/2011 5:07:06 AM PDT by houeto (Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fuzzybutt
if you are a Democrat at this point in history you are either too ignorant or too evil to tolerate

"An uncomfortable truth," that. I have said essentially the same thing to a number of people, and it doesn't usually go down well. At this point, I don't care.

Mr. niteowl77

24 posted on 03/15/2011 5:07:41 AM PDT by niteowl77 (I don't mind them stewing in their own juices, but I do mind them stewing me in their own juices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
...obama emphasized, “First, we should begin by enforcing laws that are already on the books” — a line long used by the gun lobby.

Hey, hussein obama, here's a crazy idea. How about you apply that same logic/policy to immigration and border security too? You lying, hypocritical, socialist, SOB.

I don't believe a single {expletive} word that comes out of this guy's mouth. I don't trust the government, period. I particularly don't trust the so-called "liberals" in government who (again, hypocritically) want to infringe on my liberties, my right to keep and bear arms.

No meeting. No patina of legitimacy to whatever f'd up plan to further usurp our rights obama and his cohorts in crime come up with.

25 posted on 03/15/2011 5:10:19 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

26 posted on 03/15/2011 5:11:14 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The phrase “including law enforcement” really means the heads of public unions.


27 posted on 03/15/2011 5:12:21 AM PDT by Pecos (Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Good for the NRA - the NRA does something right. They actually recognized a no-win situation (for once)


28 posted on 03/15/2011 5:12:39 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Why would anyone meet with the Obama Justice Department or Obama to discuss gun laws. Neither makes the law.

That is up to Congress, Or at least it used to be, Obama has already made himself the Supreme Court is he now making himself Congress?


29 posted on 03/15/2011 5:13:35 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Any update to a “National Background Check”, will allow the Feds to track gun owners.
You WILL be flagged in a PERMANENT DATABASE!


30 posted on 03/15/2011 5:34:59 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Really, tell the poser to go:
piss up a rope
take a hike
go herd cats
go get a beating from that shelf ass ugly woman your’re married to
I can go on here


31 posted on 03/15/2011 5:43:37 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“Sorry Mr Holder, but I’ve got to clean all my rifle butt plates that day...... Perhaps later.”


32 posted on 03/15/2011 5:54:24 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

-——he wants to ban all private sales of firearms. -——

Actually, it is much simpler than that. His motivation is to appear to be solving a problem to placate the wackos


33 posted on 03/15/2011 5:54:30 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
“Why should I or the N.R.A. go sit down with a group of people that have spent a lifetime trying to destroy the Second Amendment in the United States?” said Wayne LaPierre, the longtime chief executive of the National Rifle Association.

Well done, Wayne. Thank you. This ALMOST makes up for the NRA taking credit for what the 2nd Amendment Foundation accomplished in the McDonald Case.

34 posted on 03/15/2011 6:11:11 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
This is small politics /diversionary BS while the world burns around him. Not to mention the fact that he would back stab the NRA the first chance he got.

Let the media cover this non-event event attended only by gun control advocates..Right up their alley relevance-wise !

35 posted on 03/15/2011 6:13:03 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

This is the same thing that all conservative polls need to treat the media -

they are the enemy, seeking to destroy freedom in America, why should I meet with them?


36 posted on 03/15/2011 6:14:25 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hildy123

Since the left’s agenda is straight from the father of lies,
you should expect the terms they use to be deceptions.

Gun Safety... Reproductive choice... Social justice...


37 posted on 03/15/2011 6:15:26 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fuzzybutt

And the more you investigate it, the less “ignorance” is an option for explaining what they are doing...

http://agendadocumentary.com


38 posted on 03/15/2011 6:16:38 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I equate the whole dialog process that Obama and his minions want to gather for, to the North Koreans and their desire to get everyone to the table so they can show how much of a bully and unbending tyrant the US is...Remember the 6 party talks???

The NRA has everything to lose in talking directly with this administration, and the NRA made the right call...

I hope we only have to suffer the presense of this administration for only another couple of years...

We will be suffering for this congress and administration actions for many generations to come though...We knew that was going to be true...

I have this personal belief that when the day is over, and we are at calm, and reflect upon what we accomplished that day...

We will still have our guns, regardless of what they do or say...I believe everyone needs to make that personal committment, and be prepared to endure the consequenses of not giving them up, for any reason...Regardless of what un-Constitutional law they try to, or pass to take away our right to keep and bear arms...

They are getting desparate, so this renewed effort doesn’t surprise me one bit...


39 posted on 03/15/2011 6:20:09 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First; Envisioning; waterhill

Ping!


40 posted on 03/15/2011 6:25:39 AM PDT by ixtl (You live and learn, or you don't live long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson