Skip to comments.Risk-Free Energy: Surely, You Must Be Joking
Posted on 03/16/2011 5:13:53 AM PDT by Palmetto Patriot
It was only a matter of time before environmentalists would point toward Japan, say, "We told you so," and then declare a moral victory for anti-nuclear activism. Merely for the sake of argument, let's pretend they are right.
Eliminating nuclear power might be a nice experiment. But there is one big problem: Environmentalists are trying to eliminate all the other alternatives, as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearscience.com ...
Well, there's your problem!
No. Using all known sources of energy is too dangerous. We need to stop using them immediately. (After this comment is posted) The only exceptions are critical government functions like the department of education. OK, maybe we cant stop immediately but we could raise energy taxes a few hundred percent, except for those that cant afford it, they should get it for free. The poor, Obama, Al Gore and Pelosi should all get it for free, but the rest of us pay more.
Risk free energy will compliment the risk free Utopia Obama and Co. are creating
Look Igor, Ive invented something to heat the cave and cook food. I call it fire.
Youd better put that out right now or someone will burn their house down someday.
The objective is:
- Population Control,
- Destroying American Industry,
- Undermining America’s status in the world,
- Destroying Capitalism,
- Create a society dependent on the Gov’t,
- Maintain permanent Control.
I know of a relitively cheap, clean, abundant energy source. It is easy to tranport to homes around the country. It can be used for home heating, heating water, cooking, etc. Down side is that it is extremely explosive and may very well destroy some homes and lives if used improperly or a problem occurs.
Who’s in, there anyone who wouldn’t want this source of power?
Why don’t all the environmentalists take a walk into the ocean and solve their guilt?
Pray for America
The leftist worldview is predicated on the existance of the “perfect” society and world,
“once we get past the rough patches”.
They are willing to make everyone suffer because “the perfect place” is just over the horizon, and it will all be worth it.
This belief in inherent in their worldview. And it is a LIE.
Why dont all the environmentalists take a walk into the ocean and solve their guilt?
“Environmentalists are trying to eliminate all the other alternatives, as well.”
If it was up to them, we’d all be living in caves with candles for light, dung fires for heat and wearing animal skins for clothes.
Their whole ‘home-spun/handmade’ view of what life should be for ALL of us is so infantile and reactionary.
If those clowns want to live in the 15th century, fine. The rest of us have moved on.
In college I knew jerks like this. They went to rallies, hated their parents and the police, consumed mountains of drugs, lived in filthy apartments, wore dirty clothes, never bathed or shaved and STILL have THAT life style. They call it natural and ‘earth friendly’ but I call it lazy, stupid and anti-social.
A doctor wrote (around the 70s) that he was seeing completely disgusting health problems which had not affected humanity since the Middle Ages. He said all of these conditions, were the result of poor hygiene.
These people are still around and THEY VOTE!
If you haven’t seen it yet, your [right on] post is documented here:
Whos in, there anyone who wouldnt want this source of power? No takers, comments, questions, etc. Too dangerous?
Before it’s all over, we will hear that ALL of the many thousands lost in Japan will be the result of nuclear meltdowns.
Out media has no shame in lying to meet their objectives.
Now that is funny!
I’ll buy the land, and put a house on it, and you can build the nuke plant in my “back yard”...
we’ll split the profits halvesies, OK?
It would have to be IN the home to work. Not a problem?
Perhaps I’d rather have a nuke plant in the back yard.
No not a fuel cell, actually you may already have it. Most people want nothing to do with such a dangerous source of energy, even conservatives. It’s natural gas!
Coincidentally, I’ve been looking for a rural property with a natural gas well. Found a couple but they were pricey.
Hook up a 3k generator and you’re set, eh?
Still would like a fuel cell & nat gas well combo.
That’d be the cat’s meow right there.
It would be easier to find a small stream with plenty of head and get a micro-hydro generator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.