Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O’Reilly’s Panel: Sarah Palin’s Poll Numbers Down Because She’s ‘Overexposed’
Mediaite ^ | 3/16/11 | Alex Alvarez

Posted on 03/16/2011 9:24:44 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: UCFRoadWarrior

I had her pegged the minute she opened her trap about amnesty.


21 posted on 03/16/2011 11:03:55 PM PDT by pissant ((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, be listening on the 19th.


22 posted on 03/16/2011 11:13:20 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

Not conservative to tax Big Oil? They own Murkowski.


23 posted on 03/16/2011 11:15:53 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Bill O’Reilly’s Panel: Sarah Palin’s Poll Numbers Down Because She’s ‘Overexposed’

They're idiots. Sarah Palin is always tastefully dressed.

24 posted on 03/16/2011 11:20:45 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Did you read the rest of my post? He didn’t mean that Palin or BHO are emotional themselves, he was trying to say (albeit poorly) that they affect most people emotionally, i.e. to either love ‘em or hate ‘em.


25 posted on 03/16/2011 11:53:31 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton; AlexW

“There was no Palin bashing. BOR stated that people were “emotional” about Palin. For or against, this is certainly true.”

Thank you, that was what I was trying to clarify in my previous posts, but you did it better! :-)


26 posted on 03/16/2011 11:56:37 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

So, now you are pushing Ted Baxter’s opinion.

You line up with Politico, Ted Baxter, even probably the NY Times if they have something negative to say about Palin.

Real objective of you Pissant.


27 posted on 03/17/2011 12:03:49 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

FWIW means just that.


28 posted on 03/17/2011 12:05:07 AM PDT by pissant ((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Gee, what a surprise, Pissant once again posts another anti-Sarah article. Another BS hit piece.


29 posted on 03/17/2011 12:18:29 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bergmeid

He was talking about us, the public, Palin lovers and Palin haters.


30 posted on 03/17/2011 12:49:17 AM PDT by StayoutdaBushesWay (Every man dies, but not every man really lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior; pissant

You forgot embracing homos.........


31 posted on 03/17/2011 1:04:16 AM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Who do you want to listen to and watch for the next eight years: 1. Barack Hussein Obama 2. Joe Biden 3. Hillary Rodham Clinton 4. William Jefferson Clinton 5. Mike Huckabee 6. Ron Paul 7. Herman Cain 8. Willard Romney 9. Newt Gingrich or 10. Sarah Palin
32 posted on 03/17/2011 1:06:56 AM PDT by namvolunteer (We draw the Congressional districts this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Talk about over exposed,you couldn’t walk into a mall,bookstore,or grocery store a couple of years ago without it looking like an Obama shrine.It was an embarrassment.I mean his mug was everywhere.So this argument isn’t gonna fly,BORe.


33 posted on 03/17/2011 3:41:38 AM PDT by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Meat
Talk about over exposed,you couldn’t walk into a mall,bookstore,or grocery store a couple of years ago without it looking like an Obama shrine.It was an embarrassment.I mean his mug was everywhere.So this argument isn’t gonna fly,BORe.

Except for the fact that Obama WAS overexposed and his expectations (having risen to the "walk on water" level) were way to high. It's amazing, here in DC, how many stores that loaded up on Obama merchandise for the inauguration STILL have that merchandise sitting on the shelfs ... at VERY deep discount. Socking that much $$$ into Obama-related inventory drove at least three businesses that I know of out of business (market economy applies regardless of whether you think the guy you're investing in is the messiah or not, d*mba**es) and is causing serious problems for a third (used to be my favorite area newsstand - they've cut their inventory way way down, but have an entire area of Obama-cr*p at deep discount that they can't get rid of).

In politics there's the possibility that a candidate will "peak too early", and the rules apply across the board. Obama was very fortunate that he peaked at just the right moments. But history is replete with candidates who peaked early, burned out and lost. It's better to try to engineer peaking at the best possible moment to leave it to chance ... and I see a definitely possibility that Palin and her team are driving towards a VERY early peaking followed by the set in of significant candidate-fatigue.
34 posted on 03/17/2011 3:53:21 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

BOR, how appropriate, he is a bore. Does anyone really care what this numnuts has to say about anything? It’s laughable that he even has an audience, must be full of masochists.


35 posted on 03/17/2011 3:56:06 AM PDT by VeeP22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No, “FWIW” means your now trying to cover your relentless and weird Palin obsession and hate with a dishonest passive-aggressive “this is kinda interesting” act.
Everyone sees through it.
Get.
Help.
You’re getting scary.


36 posted on 03/17/2011 5:01:00 AM PDT by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

pissant is now ‘nobody by that name’ — not s suspension.


37 posted on 03/17/2011 9:44:59 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Liberty and Union, Now and Forever, One and Inseparable -- Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan
I love it yesterday when Levin referred to bill o'reilly, AKA: 'The leprechaun' as "the FOX 8:00 o'clock guy". Mark was talking about how O'Reilly is such a kiss-up to Obama in hopes of getting more appearances on his show where he can kiss Obama's ass some more and generate more money for himself. But I guess those two Irish guys Obama and O'reilly stick together.
38 posted on 03/23/2011 7:52:59 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson