Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin is smiling somewhere, the House votes to cut off funding to NPR
The Los Angeles Times ^ | March 17, 2011 | Tony Pierce

Posted on 03/17/2011 6:45:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

When Sarah Palin talks, people listen. They might not always agree, but they certainly hear the former Alaska governor loud and clear.

Recently the hockey mom was a guest on the Sean Hannity show and like many conservatives, Palin took aim at National Public Radio and several other federally funded arts and educational agencies.

"NPR, National Endowment for the Arts, National Endowment for the Humanities, all those kind of frivolous things that government shouldn't be in the business of funding with tax dollars -- those should all be on the chopping block as we talk about the $14-trillion debt that we're going to hand to our kids and our grandkids," Palin told Hannity on the Fox News Channel. "Yes, those are the type of things that for more than one reason need to be cut."

Wednesday more than 200 readers of the Culture Monster blog left comments debating the issue. Many suggested Palin didn't know what she was talking about. "I curse John McCain for giving this woman a voice in the national media," said one. "I don't know why someone who quit their only important elected office for monetary gain even gets a say," wrote another.

Thursday the House of Representatives voted to cut federal funding from NPR in an attempt to trim the bloated federal budget. It would also prohibit its local affiliates from using federal dollars to purchase programming from NPR or any other source.

Some readers are trying to find a silver lining in what others consider a troubling move by Republicans. Their comments after the jump.

"This may actually be good for NPR. They will no longer have to self-censor for fear of offending the flat-earthers who oppose any form of public discussion that doesn't revolve around all the urban myths they promote.....

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 112th; congress; cpb; enemedia; gop; npr; obama; palin; publicradio; republicans; sarahpalin; talkradio
She is already a stronger president than Barry O. will ever be.
1 posted on 03/17/2011 6:45:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The NPR vote was as meaningless as their claim that they CR offered “meaningful cuts”. This was a “stand alone” bill. meaning the Senate will kill it, and the NPR funding will go on and on. The House Leader-lessship of Bonehead, Can’t-or, et.al. think they are successfully fooling us into thinking they’re doing The Lord’s Work. Meh.


2 posted on 03/17/2011 6:50:12 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

But the readers of the Culture Monster blog don’t approve.

(BFD)


3 posted on 03/17/2011 6:50:21 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I don't know why someone who quit their only important elected office for monetary gain even gets a say," Well, Palin gets a say for the same reason that this effing moron does-- because she is a citizen and we have the 1st Amendment.
4 posted on 03/17/2011 6:50:25 PM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excellent now we won’t be paying for the enemy’s ammunition.


5 posted on 03/17/2011 6:50:39 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But I thought that her star was fading, that her influence was dwindling...?

Now, it's all her fault that NPR lost its federal $$$$$.

I luv it!

6 posted on 03/17/2011 6:51:05 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Where is Pissa...! never mind! LOL!

We can relax, he won’t be around at least for awhile.


7 posted on 03/17/2011 6:51:20 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

By making it a standalone vote, it assures that Reid will kill it and NPR will rock on. Part of the smoke ‘n mirrors John Boehner plan, unfortunately.

Just like the standalone repeal of Obamacare. The real vote on Obamacare was the CR, and it passed. People like Mark Levin are on to Boehner, though. We’ll see what happens from here.


8 posted on 03/17/2011 6:51:20 PM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Yeah, that's why the prime ministers of two major democracies (India and Israel) are meeting with her this weekend.
9 posted on 03/17/2011 6:52:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

FreepMail


10 posted on 03/17/2011 6:54:04 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (I am declaring 2011 the year of ME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Question for the assembled: Wasn’t Reagan the last pol with Presidential aspirations who openly called for the end of actual programs?

Palin strikes me as more Reagan-like with every passing day. The similarities between them are striking and the conditions on the ground now and(omg)32 years ago eerily reminiscent. Maybe we can finally start the necessary work of deconstructing the federal beast if she is elected.


11 posted on 03/17/2011 6:54:40 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

The Senate cannot fund anything the House does not initiate.

Not only was it not “meaningless” but whacking at the CR at 2 Billion a week does not hurt either.

Some fools, of course, think they can turn the Queen Mary on a dime. They naturally know nothing but how to squawk.


12 posted on 03/17/2011 6:54:45 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Do we know if it’s a temporary suspension or a zot?


13 posted on 03/17/2011 6:55:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

Reid killing it won’t help him nor fund NPR. Intelligent people understand that.


14 posted on 03/17/2011 6:56:31 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bad. It marks the failure of the conservatives to win the culture war. Why not take over NPR? It’s a good outlet to promote culture and education.


15 posted on 03/17/2011 6:56:46 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Cutting 10% of 100% increases isn’t turning, it’s fiddling while America burns.


16 posted on 03/17/2011 6:57:35 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We don’t know yet....hopefully its the later, but he won’t be trolling about the India, Israel trip!


17 posted on 03/17/2011 6:57:58 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yeah, that's why the prime ministers of two major democracies (India and Israel) are meeting with her this weekend.

Finally Netanyahu gets to talk to someone with a brain.

18 posted on 03/17/2011 6:59:17 PM PDT by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
At least temporarily suspended. If he brings his vile comments back it will most likely be forever.
19 posted on 03/17/2011 6:59:48 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (I am declaring 2011 the year of ME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That piece has no bias whatsoever. Nope. Not in the picture selection or the text. None.


20 posted on 03/17/2011 7:00:13 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

Cutting anything is a start in a process which must begin somewhere. It is all done while the Treason Media screams. Some people are deluded into believing that the Tea Party took power in Nov. It did not. Electing a few endorsed candidates is NOT the same as convincing the rest of the country. I had hoped smarter folks would understand this simple fact.


21 posted on 03/17/2011 7:01:29 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thanks for posting. Defund all collectives.


22 posted on 03/17/2011 7:05:08 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
Boehner better get crackin’ or he will forever be stripped of the first ‘e’ and the ‘h’.
23 posted on 03/17/2011 7:06:56 PM PDT by JPG ("2012 Can't Come Soon Enough" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

If I’d called Reps. Duncan Hunter, Michele Bachmann or some other potential candidate a homosexual, I’d expect to be banned as well.


24 posted on 03/17/2011 7:07:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Bad. It marks the failure of the conservatives to win the culture war. Why not take over NPR? It’s a good outlet to promote culture and education.

It is too thoroughly infiltrated. You would have to fire everyone and the government doesn't have the authority to do it. In military terms if you cannot hold a bridge you blow it up so that the enemy cannot use it.
25 posted on 03/17/2011 7:07:11 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Bad. It marks the failure of the conservatives to win the culture war. Why not take over NPR? It’s a good outlet to promote culture and education.

You really don't understand the concept of constitutional government, do you? The goal is not to do unto liberals as they have done unto us, no matter how tempting. The goal is to return to limited government and to give people their freedom back (a large part of which involves letting them keep their own money, rather than having it taken through excessive taxes and government spending to be used on agendas contrary to their own will).

Don't give in to the ends justify the means mentality. You'll become just another sort of liberal.

26 posted on 03/17/2011 7:09:22 PM PDT by Liberty1970 (Ephesians 2:8-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

The government doesn’t have any business running a radio station, liberal or conservative. I see no mention of it in the Constitution.


27 posted on 03/17/2011 7:09:28 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"This may actually be good for NPR. They will no longer have to self-censor for fear of offending the flat-earthers who oppose any form of public discussion that doesn't revolve around all the urban myths they promote...

Great - now let's work with these progressive idealist and cut off funding to PBS too.

28 posted on 03/17/2011 7:11:47 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Next step is to make public radio and TV pay for their broadcast licenses like everyone else. Licenses are sold by auction, I believe, and NPR is sitting on prime FM real estate.


29 posted on 03/17/2011 7:15:54 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970
The goal is to return to limited government

Sure, and how has this project been going? I've been hearing it for 30-40 years, and it's the Right's equivalent of the Left's Utopia. We've been defunding NPR for 40 years. The best we on this side can do is accuse each other "You really don't understand the concept of constitutional government, do you?"

30 posted on 03/17/2011 7:22:39 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

IT’s a start. Please don’t stop !!!!


31 posted on 03/17/2011 7:24:54 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
We can relax, he won’t be around at least for awhile.

Why, pray tell?

32 posted on 03/17/2011 7:52:35 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

oh.....which thread was it that got him Zotted? happy days are here again......


33 posted on 03/17/2011 7:56:18 PM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I don’t think he’’s been banned. I just sent him a response to one of his vile posts and it came up.

I think his profile page is faux... just a game. I’ve seen this before, by others just looking for a laugh.


34 posted on 03/17/2011 8:03:50 PM PDT by Gator113 (I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

I personally think he was suspended....but he wrote a vile comment that was flagged, but we will know soon enough.


35 posted on 03/17/2011 8:06:40 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Where is Pissa...! never mind! LOL!

I was going to ask the same thing. LOL is right


36 posted on 03/17/2011 8:28:48 PM PDT by BornToBeAmerican (Kindness will conquer evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

If you go to post 121 and 122 on the thread of concern.... you will see confirmation.... the boil has been lanced! ;>)


37 posted on 03/17/2011 8:32:09 PM PDT by Gator113 (I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

He is gone! Just like the witch is dead? LOL!

Thank the Lord! his comment was too vile!


38 posted on 03/17/2011 8:36:28 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“The Senate cannot fund anything the House does not initiate.

Not only was it not “meaningless” but whacking at the CR at 2 Billion a week does not hurt either.

Some fools, of course, think they can turn the Queen Mary on a dime. They naturally know nothing but how to squawk.”

Right, right. Those grand statesmen named Bonehead and Can’t-or are real Profiles In Courage to bring to the floor a stripped down gas-can of a bill that has no chance of going anywhere, and they know it. And right again: the $2 billion (which of course was wiped out by the mere interest on the debt on the very day they passed this joke of a CR), was yet another Profile In Courage, right? I mean, $2 billion in the face of a multi-TRILLION dollar deficit must mean those two geniuses have everyone right where they want them. Yeah, that’s it. Not.

So you tell us then. When this current joke of a CR expires in three weeks, what is it those two outstanding Repubican Leaders in the House will do then?


39 posted on 03/17/2011 9:02:13 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

“Wasn’t Reagan the last pol with Presidential aspirations who openly called for the end of actual programs?”

Nope. NPR survived Reagan. But we almost killed it in 1995.

And Sarah is Palin-like. One vast difference between Reagan and Palin is that nobody wasted time comparing Reagan to another dead conservative.


40 posted on 03/18/2011 3:31:03 AM PDT by WOSG (Carpe Diem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: antonico

The House leaders have 1/2 of 1 of 2 elected branches of Govt, or about a quarter of the cards. Holding a quarter of the cards means we cant get our way, but have to maximize our leverage with what we got.

How to maximize? Have some votes that show where we stand and use them to push for best compromise and get the most of what we can. We wont get all of what we want but if we get 50%, we are doing OK. The boehner/Cantor strategy is doing OK so far, and you can tell by the fact that complainers complain but rarely have a better idea/plan.

So ... You tell US:

- You want them to defund NPR/PBS or not? They held the vote, they won the vote. Bully for Boehner and Cantor for that. That is ALL they can do in the House.

- You want them to actually PASS things into law, then all they can get past Obama’s desk is watered down stuff. You want that or not?

If you want the watered down stuff, you get $4 billion in cuts in a 3 week CR. You want it or do you want nothing?

If not, what’s YOUR brilliant plan to actually get Obama to sign something better?

Anybody?


41 posted on 03/18/2011 3:39:13 AM PDT by WOSG (Carpe Diem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Exactly,they could have Defunded and Killed it,instead they created a Bumper sticker that means Nothing and will be Killed By the Senate. Boner and Cantor are Frauds


42 posted on 03/18/2011 3:40:33 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Excellent and spot on. They share conservatism, but the comparisons end there.


43 posted on 03/18/2011 3:49:31 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
'She is already a stronger president than Barry O. will ever be...'

WHAT?!? ...so she is a bit of a community organizer .....BUT did she ever bring the whole INTERNATIONAL OIL INDUSTRY to heel....by organizing ACES..the 'ALASKAN CLEAR and EQUITABLE SHARE' an overarching law...a genius framework which forced BIG OIL to share industry profits with the citizens of Alaska providing untold monies and Alaskan infrastructure improvements to untold numbers of Alaskan citizens? DID she DO that? wellll....heh heh heh.... by god I guess she DID.......
44 posted on 03/18/2011 4:13:15 AM PDT by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

“If not, what’s YOUR brilliant plan to actually get Obama to sign something better?”

To make the suggestion that what Boner and Can’t-or ought to be doing is to agree to get Obama’s signature is such a farcical notion it could only be uttered by a RINO, and you’re probably someone working with this leadership. Or at least you support their efforts. Obama couldn’t care less about the Republicans, or what they want or what they think they can get him to sign. If he did he would’t have proposed a monstrous, onerous, almost laughably stupid $3.7 TRILLION Budget for them to pass. A budget his own Treasury Secretary said to the Senate will bankrupt the nation. To think Obama can do that with anything other than contempt for his opposition is to be someone who thinks he really has “Economic Growth” as a policy agenda. Obama, if anything, has shown he’s to be stopped, not appeased or negotiated with. And it’s clear Boner and Can’t-or (who’s the real culprit behind the attacks on House Conservatives) have no stomach, spine or fortitude for such a fight. They want to appease - that much is clear. And just so you know, this piecemeal crap of weeks-old CR’s in the Senate is about to come to an end. A Cadre of Republicans there have already said “enough already”, and will not support another one. The House Leadership can shut down the government to their benefit: most people think it’s going in the wrong direction anyway. Obama doesn’t have the glow of uniting people to him anymore. Boner and Can’t-or have fears that are equivalent to the bogeyman in the closet: they’re WAY overblown.

You institute the defunding of ObamaCare into the CR and make the Senate Democrats vote it down to save it, so the government shuts down. At this point the government shutting down is THE best option we have. But Speaker Bonehead has already declared he’s not doing that, even though the vast majority of those who made his Speakership possible - the voters - are fine with doing it. ObamaCare was such a huge disaster for Democrats in November it’s time to make them accountable for it again. Make them preserve a program that’s been declared unconstitutional en toto; has been fraudulently funded by a stealth appropriation of money; and is so unpopular that “Friends of Barack” are piling up waivers daily (over 1,000 and counting) to remain solvent as organizations. Make the Democrats in the Senate - 21 of whom are up for reelection in 18 months - defend ObamaCare by shutting the government down. Make them defend the very program that cost them “1/2” of the legislature. Then watch Republicans win the other half in a walkover.

Unless of course, Boner and Can’t-or - the same Can’t-or who flaunts his Gucci shoes - really see themselves as CEO and COO of House of Rep Inc,. and part of their “corporate perks” is to get their hands on that ObamaCare appropriated “stash” and redirect it. You know, in keeping with that Rove-Bush philosophy pf Progressive Republicanism. It’s the Rove Doctrine that says the issue really isn’t whether government spends too much, the REAL issue is to make sure anyone with an (R) next to their name on a ballot gets elected so we can have a lot of (R)’s sitting on Committee Chairs, doling out that taxpayer funded largesse to THEIR Republican Blue Blood folks.

Best of luck to Boner and Can’t-or with that.


45 posted on 03/18/2011 7:44:30 AM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Therefore...? Astonishing. Reagan had no contemporary such as Goldwater? Let’s assume you are right and have thought out your response, does it follow that Reagan would have no legacy, because he had no legacy? Now, let’s assume that you are wrong and have merely offered reactionary drivel... ding! ding! ding! We have a winner.


46 posted on 03/20/2011 7:22:45 AM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
We can relax, he won’t be around at least for awhile.

While his PDS was over the top and had become obsessive and that comment that got him banned was reprehensible, I hope pissant eventually gets restored to FR.

I liked him before his PDS took on demonic-possession-like characteristics.

47 posted on 03/20/2011 7:28:29 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline licharacteristics.ke that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I would think they would be blaming the kid with the sting video (and caused the firings at the top of NPR), more than Sarah. I guess they hate Sarah so much that they would glaze over real reasons for the demise of government teat for NPR.


48 posted on 03/20/2011 7:43:02 AM PDT by LowOiL ("Abomination" sure sounds like "ObamaNation" to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

“Reagan had no contemporary such as Goldwater?”

Reagan went far beyond what Goldwater. Comparing to Goldwater only diminishes Reagan. The point is, Reagan WAS Reagan, a unique and capable conservative leader, so that you didnt HAVE to compare him to anyone else. Reagan earned his greatness through what he said and did, not via comparisons with the glow of prior greats.

“Let’s assume you are right and have thought out your response”

I have, for years. For years we have heard this twaddle of ‘the next Reagan’... its a pipe dream. We keep looking for the next Reagan, but miss the brilliance of conservatives among us, .. as if the newt 1994 Congress wasnt already a reaganite Congress. As if conservatives arent already using Reagan as the touchstone in debate after debate, as if folks like Mike Pence arent already exemplars of such policies. As if sites like Redstate or this one dont already keep the flame of conservative values embodied by him.

There will not be another Reagan, that wont be possible, but that’s okay, because WE the conservative base of the GOP are ALL “Reagan Republicans” THAT IS THE LEGACY OF REAGAN.

“Reagan does it follow that Reagan would have no legacy, because he had no legacy?”
Reagan’s legacy does not require another politician to come along and be the ‘next’ one of him. His legacy is already an enduring one and a strong economy for a generation is a good enough testament.

That’s the way he would want it to be, and if you read Michael Reagan on the topic you’ll get that as well.

“reactionary drivel” - that’s what liberals called Reagan’s speeches... yes, I think my perspective here is ... Reaganesque.


49 posted on 03/20/2011 10:35:53 AM PDT by WOSG (Carpe Diem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson