Posted on 03/18/2011 4:17:37 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
The New York Times just cant seem to get much of anything right lately. No wonder theyre facing economic and reputation woes. Their article today falsely reporting on my record as governor is full of spin, and I shall call them out on it.
Regardless of the recent political posturing, ACES (Alaskas Clear and Equitable Share) is a success for all stakeholders who want more domestic energy supplies for our great country. The Alaskan people (who collectively own the natural resources, via our state constitution), the resource producers who bid on the right to develop our oil and gas, and consumers all benefit under ACES. It incentivizes production and development. It works.
Amazingly, to the uninformed (or to those who really dont want to incentivize oil exploration in America) ACES is spun to sound like an oil windfall profits tax and its progressivity is made to sound excessive. In reality, it was born of a need to have a tax structure that did three things:
(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...
LOL!
lol
You beat my post by 20 seconds. LOL!!
...another nightstick to the gonads of the New York Times...ouch!
Do the New York Slimes still exist..I think only 2 people read it now, and I’m being generous. LOVED how Sarah smacked down those fools. She stands up for herself, she doesn’t let these clowns get away with posting BS
She's correct, of course. The New York Times may have had occasional flings with accuracy when the Old Man, Adolph Ochs, was still running the place. But that's been decades and decades ago. Ever since his offspring have been in control, it's become the house organ of the left, never letting the facts get in the way of its blatantly anti-American agenda.
They still deliver the NYT to some nursing homes here in New England...
Great minds think alike! :)
Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval"
8^D
Another excellent article on the subject can be found here:
http://biggovernment.com/wpitcher/2011/03/18/dismantling-the-nyts-misrepresentations-of-governor-pal
Thanks for posting that! I’ve been at a meeting all day and had not seen it.
NYT, There You Go Again
The New York Times just cant seem to get much of anything right lately. No wonder theyre facing economic and reputation woes. Their article today falsely reporting on my record as governor is full of spin, and I shall call them out on it.
Regardless of the recent political posturing, ACES (Alaskas Clear and Equitable Share) is a success for all stakeholders who want more domestic energy supplies for our great country. The Alaskan people (who collectively own the natural resources, via our state constitution), the resource producers who bid on the right to develop our oil and gas, and consumers all benefit under ACES. It incentivizes production and development. It works.
Amazingly, to the uninformed (or to those who really dont want to incentivize oil exploration in America) ACES is spun to sound like an oil windfall profits tax and its progressivity is made to sound excessive. In reality, it was born of a need to have a tax structure that did three things:
1. It could not be created under a cloud of political corruption and self-dealing like the former Alaska administration and legislatures PPT oil valuation structure. Thats a critical fact that is now frequently overlooked years later. Remember the legislators and oil industry players who went to jail because of bribes leading to votes in favor of the former administrations PPT, which was unfairly tilted in favor of the resource producers against the resource owners (i.e., the people of Alaska)? Have we conveniently forgotten the fact that a corrupt process brought forth PPT, and I and others set out to change it by cleaning up the corruption?
2. It had to align the interests of Alaskans and the oil producers through exploration and production credits in partnership so that they benefit proportionally from commercialization of Alaskas sovereign resources. This is very different from a government overtaxing personal or corporate income in which the government has no ownership stake in whatever it is that is being taxed.
3. It had to use a progressivity system that protects the producers from commercial strain when oil prices are low; otherwise the producers would seek development opportunities elsewhere. ACES does incentivize industry, but beware that Big Oil will always do what it does best for its shareholders: it will look out for its bottom line and always claim that it needs even more tax breaks. More power to them for trying, but resource owners deserve A CLEAR and EQUITABLE SHARE (ACES) of the value of their commonly-owned oil and gas.
ACES accomplished all three. The current criticism of this fair valuation makes no real sense. As an article at Big Government notes:
The number of oil companies filing with the Alaska Department of Revenue has doubled indicating that competition has indeed increased. Alaska has the second most business friendly tax set-up up two spots since the passage of ACES. Additionally, a report from Governor Parnells Department of Revenue indicated that 2009 yielded a record high in oil jobs. Even more recently, the newest employment numbers from Alaska show that oil job numbers were higher in January 2011 than in January 2010, indicating that jobs are growing at the seasonal level. Parnell argues that state revenues are in jeopardy, but it is estimated that his proposal would reduce revenues by $100-200 million.
Most importantly, Alaska enjoys a $12 billion surplus thanks to ACES and the sound fiscal policies of my administration. I put billions of dollars aside in savings accounts (though I could have easily spent those billions and made a lot of friends with big-spending legislators on both sides of the aisle), and I continued to veto excess spending and Obama stimulus funds, and chopped earmarks by 86% much to the chagrin of liberal legislators who were used as sources in the article. Its kind of amusing to see state legislators claim credit for the surplus when they didnt vote for ACES, and they cried to high heaven when I vetoed their wasteful spending on their special interest projects.
Of course, I could have made a lot more friends in Juneau if I had spent the surplus. But I chose to put billions in savings for a rainy day and return a portion to the people of Alaska. (It was their money after all.) I paid down hundreds of millions of dollars into our under-funded state pension plans, then set aside another billion for forward-funding education. I fought the unions demands for more benefits, engaged in hiring freezes, and cut frivolous state expenditures again, much to the chagrin of those who spend other peoples money recklessly. Thats sound fiscal policy. Im proud of it, and Alaska is stronger today because of it.
Now, if others would like to claim credit for it, that is fine. As Ronald Reagan used to remind us: There is not limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he doesn’t mind who gets the credit. Amen!
But lets not pretend that ACES wasnt a key factor in the surplus, and lets not pretend that it hasnt been a success.
As for AGIA, our long-awaited natural gas pipeline project is moving along according to plan. A huge partnership was developed with Exxon and TransCanada when I put the project out for competitive bids, instead of using behind-closed-door schemes that would have screwed the public. Alaska will help America become energy independent, despite anti-energy politicos claiming AGIA won’t work. Its already got the 50-year dream off the dime and in the works. See, competition works. So does a transparent process.
- Sarah Palin
They have fish sticks.
let me tell you somthing— THIS WOMAN WOULD MAKE A AWESOME PRESIDENT ANYWAY YOU LOOK AT IT.. AS GOOD OR BETTER THAN REAGAN- you just dont see it that plan spoken anymore-
Gotta love her
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.