Skip to comments.Clinton: Fears of Libyan 'unspeakable atrocities'
Posted on 03/19/2011 10:04:54 AM PDT by BenLurkin
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton says the U.S. will bring "unique capabilities to bear" in Libya as a global coalition begins enforcing a U.N.-authorized no-fly zone to protect civilians from Moammar Gadhafi's forces.
(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...
Wasn’t Libya on the human rights commission a few weeks back?
She wasn’t too concernend with killing innocent Serbs, hm?
Exactly why, precisely, the hell, is what happens in Libya our problem?
The “International Order” deemed their deaths necessary.
Its the BUSH DOCTRINE for the Mid East, all over again.
maybe the GOP should start chanting “Unilateral intervention” ? Oh, that was the MSM and Dems chanting it and denying the facts on the Iraq “Invasion”.
I think this war at 10,000 feet is like Obama flying over the “Midwest USA”....no much will happen on the ground because of it. Too little, too late, and hope for change may not yield the desired results. Good luck Rebels, Obama has spoken from Brazil, and his words are empty.
Yeah, he was.
We're living in an Alice In Wonderland world. I thought Gadaffi was the crazy one. maybe I had better step back and re-evaluate the situation.
Hillary: “Obama’s fault!”
“The International Order deemed their deaths necessary.”
No,no,no... You just don’t understand....
Democrat ObamaWar is a kinder, more gentle way of killing people, that makes the dead completely invisible to any US network TV camera.
Just ask any anti-war liberal about this.
Obama needs an enemy to get America united around him. Iran was impossible for Obama to go after. They both share the same feelings towards Islam.
Oh, no, oh, no, not another milk factory!!! Hill worried about the brotherhood.
But not a peep out of her on the atrocity of the Palestinians killing the Jewish family including the small children.
what about the “unspeakable atrocities” in North Korea?
oh wait, no one is speaking about them...
They just had no idea which country it would be.
I cannot get any of the desk chair army that has been posting here to answer that damn question.
Nearly a year of debate in congress and the UN before Bush got approval from both to “rush to war”.
Obama holds out for 3 freakin weeks and doesn’t even bother talking to congress and liberals call him “retrained”.
I said the same last week, we have no dog in this fight and all the supporters are doing is giving o’bummer a greater chance of reelection.
Difference is, Relatively speaking Gadaffi and US were warming up to each other compared to our relationships with Iran and North Korea.
In other words, North Korea and Iran are more of a threat to America so Obama's not going to go after them.
Clinton, a writer for Glamour Magazine...
because Libya is where Italy and France get a lot of their oil and where they and Germany have a lot of business investment which Qadaffi has threatened to destroy
Think of the european businessmen, think of the humanity...
Remember 25 years ago, we lost an F-11 and brave pilot out of Lakenheath because France would not let our guys fly through fench airspace to attack Qadaffi’s radars after he killed a US serviceman and threatened international shipping in the Gulf of Surt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.