Skip to comments.
BP starting heavy oil facility to test production feasibility
Petroleum News ^
| Week of March 20, 2011
| Alan Bailey
Posted on 03/21/2011 8:56:11 AM PDT by thackney
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
I remember reading about the planning for this project back in 2006 when I was still working in the Alaska Oil Industry.
1
posted on
03/21/2011 8:56:17 AM PDT
by
thackney
2
posted on
03/21/2011 8:59:05 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
3
posted on
03/21/2011 9:01:24 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
(The government is not best which secures life and property-there is a more valuable thing-manhood.)
To: azhenfud
Alaska has 6 refineries, if I remember correctly.
5 of them are fairly little.
4
posted on
03/21/2011 9:04:21 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: azhenfud
5
posted on
03/21/2011 9:05:54 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
Because of that linkage (with light oil), the time to look at heavy oil is now, West said. And in fact the longer we wait to look at it, the more the light oil declines, and at some point were going to curtail the amount of heavy oil that we can get off the Slope. Another good reason for going into ANWR, IMO.
6
posted on
03/21/2011 9:22:19 AM PDT
by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: thackney
The tankers run from North Pole to Dawson, Canada everyday once the road opens. North pole supplies our entire area and they use to haul it all the way to Seattle too, where it was sold a couple bucks less a gallon than here in Alaska; just business. I always heard it said the only reason they had any refineries was to supply military fuel needs, those tankers must be all extra production.
Ak will have oil for many years into the future and the price will only keep going up; making it more valuable and Alaska the most tax friendly state for it's residents.
Oil industry pays around 62% in taxes and that includes state, feds, and local. I read that many places around the world, the oil companys pay 80 & 90% and get shot at or nationalized or have various political upheaval problems in the end. So, I do believe oil will be coming out of the ground here in Alaska for another 50 years.
7
posted on
03/21/2011 9:28:11 AM PDT
by
Eska
To: thackney
8
posted on
03/21/2011 9:37:23 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: thackney
9
posted on
03/21/2011 9:40:52 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: PapaBear3625
Until they get a natural gas pipeline, they don’t want more methane on the North Slope.
Beside, the oil pipeline needs more liquid.
10
posted on
03/21/2011 9:43:39 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
What is the gravity of this stuff ?
To: thackney
Is there any of this heavy crude above the formations in the Prudho Bay Unit?
12
posted on
03/21/2011 10:27:48 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
To: Eric in the Ozarks
13
posted on
03/21/2011 10:29:34 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: bert
14
posted on
03/21/2011 10:36:37 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
Thanks so much...... some but mostly next door
15
posted on
03/21/2011 10:46:29 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
To: Eric in the Ozarks
By the way, combined with the "normal" viscosity of this stuff, it is darn cold. This is a shallow reservoir near the permafrost level. See post 14 for chart.
16
posted on
03/21/2011 10:54:26 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
From the info, it appears Alaska’s six refineries operate at about 35% capacity in comparison to those in Louisiana and the bulk of their finished product is heavy distillates.
17
posted on
03/21/2011 11:30:46 AM PDT
by
azhenfud
(The government is not best which secures life and property-there is a more valuable thing-manhood.)
To: azhenfud
operate at about 35% capacity in comparison to those in Louisiana and the bulk of their finished product is heavy distillates. How did you come up with that? That link is capacities, not production.
I am interested into what numbers you are comparing.
18
posted on
03/21/2011 11:50:37 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: azhenfud
19
posted on
03/21/2011 12:10:58 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: thackney
In the “Operable (Barrels per Calendar Day)” column(s);
Alaska has six refineries with total bbls/day of 393,980
Louisiana has 17 operable with total bbls/day of 3,171,923
393,980 / 6 = 65,663 average per refinery
3,171,923 / 17 = 186,584 average per refinery
(65,663 / 186,584) x 100 = 35.19 percent
I realize there’s a world’s difference in the geographical locations of the refineries regarding climate, but is it 65% worth of a difference or does the difference occur in the refinery size/capacity? I honestly don’t know. Are Alaska’s refineries 65% smaller in scale compared to Louisiana’s?
20
posted on
03/21/2011 12:22:06 PM PDT
by
azhenfud
(The government is not best which secures life and property-there is a more valuable thing-manhood.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson