Posted on 03/22/2011 2:25:49 AM PDT by Prospero
The muzzie bro’hood in Egypt is taking over as we speak. Through MASSIVE voter fraud a few days ago, a referendum instituting a lift on the ban on faith-based government paves the way for Shariah law passed. Other referenda that passed sets the bro’hood up for a takeover. Keep in mind that just three months ago, in December, they were soundly defeated in their bid to take over legislative and judicial positions.
Egypt, Tunisia, and now Libya and Yemen.......all with the help of the U.S. president under the guise of “humanitarian” aid.
There can be no doubt left in anyone’s mind except that of an utter fool that obastard isn’t a muzzie and working against the best interests of this country. Compare his indifferent response to the true democratic insurgency of the Iranian populace last year compared to his aiding and abetting of the muzzie bro’hood efforts in Egypt and Libya. They didn’t need his help in Tunisia or Yemen - they simply tumbled.
They will be sorry, though. Either way now, since western Europe and the U.S. have turned on Gadaffi, there will be no more control of the flow of illegal Africans into western Europe. Gadaffi was the last bastion of control over the launch points through the Med. The Brits and the French undertook this to protect their Libyan oil supply (80% of Libyan oil goes to western Europe). Now they are screwed either way.
With what has happened in the ME, African hordes will be muzlimized and sent out to fan across Europe in droves, then onto Canada and the U.S..
And we pay taxes to let this guy hide behind the constitution and the Secret Service.
Omuzzie isn’t indecisive. He decided long ago he wants to subject America to communism through authoritarian Islamic rule. I believe he intends to return as leader of a multiple country world power in about 15+- years.
I hadn't thought about the immigration aspects of it.
That’s because he’s more easily toppled. Notice that none of the Shariah-run dictatorships are being touched by foreign intervention? Iran? No. Syria? No.
Iran is the intervenor.
Iran is the cause of all the problems
Oh, I know. I was speaking tongue in cheek.
Last Friday. The government snipers were on the rooftops and shot into the crowds as the marchers passed beneath.
“Thousands of protesters in Yemen mounted a massive protest in the capital of Sanaa on Friday, but ran into a trap set by government forces, which fired on them from rooftops and killed 46, wounding some two hundred. It is alleged that the troops set tires on fire and created walls of flame with gasoline, trapping the crowds and allowing snipers to fire into them as though they were fish in a barrel.”
http://www.juancole.com/2011/03/yemeni-troops-massacre-46-wound-hundreds.html
Yemen is a tough case. Al Qaida is embedded in the north; Yemen is supposedly the place where bin Laden is hiding after escaping from Afghanistan in 2001. We have been using air bases there for an expanded campaign against AQAP. Because of that, we cannot actively take a part in a rebellion against the current leadership.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704658204575610623765564574.html
The Grand Calphate is coming, within the year. And the 13th Imam.
His name is Barak.
And WW III.
Hopefully, he won’t be replaced by an Al Qaeda-friendly regime or a bunch of warlords like in Somalia.
"Theory" from the early days when that profession began to be seriously taught and studied. I meant to make a distinction between what individuals allow themselves to do as moral agents (for lack of a better term) and what nations are expected to do as a very different kind of 'moral agent,' especially in their relations with other nations
I'm pretty sure you get my drift.
As individuals we have (many of us anyway, and many more are legally bound) to exercise a definitely responsibility to intervene when we see another person in distress.
The state, on the other hand, can deprive citizens of life, liberty and property (following due process, in the United States.
Ideally.
That's the theory, anyway.
In the case of Libya, for example, it could be argued that allowing Q'Daffy to run rough shod over one of the foremost hot bed home towns of the foreign nationals who roamed over the Iraq to fight against American troops as "insurgents" was probably not among our "raw self interests."
Foreign Policy schools used to teach nations were not moral agents, and they should, be expected to act in their own 'raw' self interest, despite world opinion.
It seems there is now a school of academic thought, among the anointed curia, that holds nations to be actual moral agents in their own right, and that's where this "Responsibility 2 Protect" doctrine may originate.
Human Rights, determined by President Carter to be a cornerstone of our national foreign policy, was disastrous.
There's a elementary example taught among the Old School from the time of Napoleon, when Alexander of Russia lied about something to the Emperor, ostensibly his ally, though he initially saw himself as a very Christian man and definitely a responsible moral agent. It bothered him a lot, and the story goes he rationalized that deception because, as Tzar, he was acting as Head of State, as the corporate entity called Russia. The lie was definitely in his nation's self-interest.
Perhaps the New School can't divorce its individual actions from those done on behalf of, and in the name of, a nation with larger interests.
Something like that, anyway.
That’s a cheerful thought!
I meant Mahdi, not Imam. My Bad - my Arabic sucks.
(Saalam i walik)
None of this would be happening but for obastard.
in case anyone hasn’t figured out... the muslims are not capable of maintaining a viable democracy.... it is merely a transition to theocracy... soon the entire muslim world will be one bloc as a caliphate with aims of jihad against the rest of the world. and with the second coming of jimmy carter in the white house, I fear we will be unable to stand up to them...
remove obama... now...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.