Skip to comments.Obama may be in deep trouble ... Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court
Posted on 03/22/2011 11:58:28 AM PDT by Ballygrl
Obama may be in deep trouble Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court
By Rebel Rouser from Texas
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obamas major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, Thats not true, when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Courts ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until Obama is gone. Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.
The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.
In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can opt out.
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obamas history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.
The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg. Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.
Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.
Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona.
That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.
The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.
A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
First I’ve seen of this. Awesome post, thanks!
The Beginning of the End of Obotulism PING!!
File Under: Believe It When I See it.
I had a feeling from the get-go that this supposed “professor” of constitutional law would prove to have very limited understanding of the Constituion.
Obama is America's and my number one enemy!
I didn’t know Justice Kennedy said he wouldn’t retire until Obama was gone. Good for him—now if only he would decide issues via the Constitution every time.
I’ll believe it when I see it. Roberts does not strike me as a “rock-the-boat” type.
I hope and pray that even one of these potential challenges to Obama’s reign comes to fruition. All of them at once would be better.
I completely agree. But I find it fascinating that Obama doesn't seem to have any "gates" plaguing him. No explicit "scandals" that the media is delving into. Basically, he is running a tight ship with no overt corruption or scandals making their way into the daily press.
Oh, sure. The crazy "birthers" are out there -- but that reflects badly on them, not him.
And Sarah Palin has some stuff to say -- but she's an idiot, and he's brilliant, everyone knows that.
And Fox News spreads propaganda -- but who watches them?
Nope. The Obama adminsitration seems to be remarkably scandal-free. Curious, ain't it?
Could this be true? Dont mess with me!/:) I pray that this goes in lightening speed.
At some point, the scat must contact the ventilation device...........
Add in the lack of Congressional consent before attacking Libya—
The court will rule on Obamacare.
But the charges of corruption will have to be taken up by the House in impeachment hearings. The Supreme court can do little about corruption in the white house.
It will come to naught, unless the nutless pubbies actually do something with it.
I pray for the good health of Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia.
I haven’t seen this posted before, either....
Thank-you for posting, Ballygrl! A++ !
Y O W Z A...Y O W Z A...Y O W Z A !!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’ll believe it when I see it. Maybe the Supreme court will wait until summer 2012 for maximum impact on his election? Is that fair to do?