Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama may be in deep trouble ... Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court
RedWhiteBlueNews ^ | 3.8.10 | Rebel Rouser from Texas

Posted on 03/22/2011 11:58:28 AM PDT by Ballygrl

Obama may be in deep trouble… Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court

By Rebel Rouser from Texas

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.

Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama’s major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.

The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, ‘That’s not true,’ when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court’s ruling.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.

Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until ‘Obama is gone.’ Apparently, the Court has had enough.

The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.

First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.

The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.

In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can ‘opt out.’

Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.

The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.

And that is only the tip of the iceberg. Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.

Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.

Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona.

That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.

And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.

The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.

A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling — that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birth; black; certificate; certifigate; commiecare; corrupt; hawaii; healthcare; illegal; justice; obama; obamacare; panthers; repeal; roberts; scotus; sickofit; socialsecurity; ssan; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-223 next last
I did a search and didn't see this posted, hopefully it's not a duplicate.
1 posted on 03/22/2011 11:58:34 AM PDT by Ballygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

First I’ve seen of this. Awesome post, thanks!


2 posted on 03/22/2011 11:59:56 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The Beginning of the End of Obotulism PING!!


3 posted on 03/22/2011 12:02:34 PM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

File Under: Believe It When I See it.


4 posted on 03/22/2011 12:02:51 PM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I had a feeling from the get-go that this supposed “professor” of constitutional law would prove to have very limited understanding of the Constituion.


5 posted on 03/22/2011 12:02:51 PM PDT by freespirited (Truth is the new hate speech. -- Pamela Geller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy...

Obama is America's and my number one enemy!

6 posted on 03/22/2011 12:03:01 PM PDT by IbJensen (Grab your pitchforks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I didn’t know Justice Kennedy said he wouldn’t retire until Obama was gone. Good for him—now if only he would decide issues via the Constitution every time.


7 posted on 03/22/2011 12:03:09 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I’ll believe it when I see it. Roberts does not strike me as a “rock-the-boat” type.


8 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:04 PM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I hope and pray that even one of these potential challenges to Obama’s reign comes to fruition. All of them at once would be better.


9 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:12 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.

The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.


Is this truth or speculation?
10 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:12 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.

I completely agree. But I find it fascinating that Obama doesn't seem to have any "gates" plaguing him. No explicit "scandals" that the media is delving into. Basically, he is running a tight ship with no overt corruption or scandals making their way into the daily press.

Oh, sure. The crazy "birthers" are out there -- but that reflects badly on them, not him.
And Sarah Palin has some stuff to say -- but she's an idiot, and he's brilliant, everyone knows that.
And Fox News spreads propaganda -- but who watches them?

Nope. The Obama adminsitration seems to be remarkably scandal-free. Curious, ain't it?

11 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:24 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Could this be true? Dont mess with me!/:) I pray that this goes in lightening speed.


12 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:24 PM PDT by GoCards (RUN SARAH RUN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

At some point, the scat must contact the ventilation device...........


13 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:49 PM PDT by Red Badger (How can anyone look at the situation in Libya and be for gun control is beyond stupid. It's suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Add in the lack of Congressional consent before attacking Libya—


14 posted on 03/22/2011 12:04:53 PM PDT by reagandemocrat (Instant Karma's gonna get you--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

The court will rule on Obamacare.

But the charges of corruption will have to be taken up by the House in impeachment hearings. The Supreme court can do little about corruption in the white house.


15 posted on 03/22/2011 12:05:15 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

It will come to naught, unless the nutless pubbies actually do something with it.


16 posted on 03/22/2011 12:05:33 PM PDT by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I pray for the good health of Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia.


17 posted on 03/22/2011 12:05:43 PM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I haven’t seen this posted before, either....

Thank-you for posting, Ballygrl! A++ !


18 posted on 03/22/2011 12:05:52 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (A Jimmy Carter got us a Ronald Reagan......A Barack Obama will get us a Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Y O W Z A...Y O W Z A...Y O W Z A !!!!!!!!!!!!!


19 posted on 03/22/2011 12:06:08 PM PDT by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I’ll believe it when I see it. Maybe the Supreme court will wait until summer 2012 for maximum impact on his election? Is that fair to do?


20 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:02 PM PDT by listenhillary (Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Don’t forget to add declaring war on Libya without congressional approval.


21 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:08 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I’d love to get excited over this but the best I can do is, “I’ll believe it when I see it.”


22 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:14 PM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

This article is several months old judging from comments at source blog dated October 2010. The court has been in session since that time. Where’s the smackdown?


23 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:21 PM PDT by yetidog (/*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

There are a lot of claims made by the author that I’ve never seen before and are not sourced in the article. I’d love to see this “smack down” myself but I have pretty big doubts about the validity of the authors claims.


24 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:21 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (What, if not a bagel and coffee, confirms the existence of a just and loving God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Is this a year old? The state of the union speech where he castigated the ccourt was earlyi in 2010, not in 2011.


25 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:38 PM PDT by Piranha (Obama won like Bernie Madoff attracted investors: by lying about his values, policy and plans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Thanks go out to Thor from ConservativeCave who found this.


26 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:41 PM PDT by Ballygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Glad to hear that the SC may not be in a self-induced coma.


27 posted on 03/22/2011 12:07:41 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can ‘opt out.’

Apparently they can, as long as they act through a politically connected union, business, or other organization that donates to the right (or should I say "left") causes.

28 posted on 03/22/2011 12:08:27 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Please don’t toy with my emotions.


29 posted on 03/22/2011 12:08:36 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

This article is pure speculation and nonsense based on little more than the author’s review of well known current events. Sorry.

For example, the Supreme Court has zero ability to do anything about Holder’s decision not to pursue the Black Panthers’ case.


30 posted on 03/22/2011 12:08:49 PM PDT by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Wait, someone is gonna stand up to the limp wristed, pansy ass, man-wife having president?!

Color me doubtful!


31 posted on 03/22/2011 12:09:05 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I never thought about that, but you are right, and it is VERY curious.

I just hope he has finally pushed some of the SC Justices past their point of tolerance. I fervently hope this is true.


32 posted on 03/22/2011 12:09:22 PM PDT by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

“Obama may be in deep trouble… Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court”

Misleading headline. The article never cites where Roberts said that.


33 posted on 03/22/2011 12:09:22 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr

“I didn’t know Justice Kennedy said he wouldn’t retire until Obama was gone. Good for him—now if only he would decide issues via the Constitution every time.”

*********

And that could be why he said he wouldn’t leave until obumbler’s gone; so he can vote FOR the corrupt crap that comes his way, not against.


34 posted on 03/22/2011 12:09:29 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.

Isn't the fraudulent use of a Social Security Number a felony? If so, the Fraudster-in-Chief is ineligible to hold ANY federal office for the remainder of his life. I'd also like to see his college and law school records released, as well as his IL Bar application - because I'd bet dollars (real ones, made of silver) to donuts that he lied on student loan and grant applications, as well as the bar application - felonies all.

Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.

Nixon was a piker compared to this guy. Nixon, for all of his faults and policy errors, was a 100% loyal American and loved his country to the point that he wouldn't challenge the 1969 election results (compare and contrast with Algore) and didn't want to put the country through an impeachment (compare and contrast to Billy Jeff). Assuming that there is someone left in a few decades who gives a damn about American history, Nixon will be shown to be not so bad in comparison to a bunch of those on the other side of the aisle - most especially Fauxbama.

35 posted on 03/22/2011 12:09:43 PM PDT by Ancesthntr (Tyrant: "Spartans, lay down your weapons." Free man: "Persian, come and get them!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

One can only hop some Patriots are left in the FBI.


36 posted on 03/22/2011 12:09:54 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

More talk, NO ACTION. Zero is above the law, we’ve seen it over & over, he is funeded my muzzies & their goal is to take over this country. He won’t stop til that is achieved!


37 posted on 03/22/2011 12:10:36 PM PDT by blondee123 (Japan in MAJOR CRISIS & ZERO PARTIES ON! IMPEACH HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I am sure this is written by someone sharing our views, but it I am hopeful that at least some of it is factual, and not wishful thinking. I am sure we won’t see any of our 5 closest allies on the court leave by choice before the term ends. If Obama goes 8 years, though, it is almost inevitable at least one of the five has declining health problems or other reasons to leave in that time frame. I hope to hell these five votes stay intact for the Obamacare hearings.


38 posted on 03/22/2011 12:10:36 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.

The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.”

I have never heard about this at all.


39 posted on 03/22/2011 12:10:41 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

ping


40 posted on 03/22/2011 12:10:41 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raygunfan

Took the words right out of my mouth.


41 posted on 03/22/2011 12:11:40 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

Do they have the guts to defend America and our Constitution against an obvious enemy? In other words, the guts to do their jobs and uphold their oaths?

I hate to say this but I doubt it.


42 posted on 03/22/2011 12:12:04 PM PDT by Bullish (Obama's obviously drunk at the wheel and should be taken off the road before he gets people killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

This is from 3.8.10. It’s a year old.


43 posted on 03/22/2011 12:12:04 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl
"The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls."

It's okay. They were just crackers. Thats in the constitution. Just ask Eric Holder....
44 posted on 03/22/2011 12:12:06 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

How can a Democrat/Liberal/Progressive president be in trouble?

No Democrat can do any wrong. Whatever they do is for the people, for the benefit of the children, and no evil, mean, hateful Republican law can keep them from giving the world pure democracy whenever the accursed REpublic keeps them from power.

/SARC/


45 posted on 03/22/2011 12:12:32 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

A lot of wishful thinking and conjecture in that article. Don’t hold your breath waiting for a SCOTUS smackdown.


46 posted on 03/22/2011 12:12:40 PM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raygunfan
File Under: Believe It When I See it.

Unfortunately, I have to do the same.

47 posted on 03/22/2011 12:12:57 PM PDT by houeto (Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ballygrl

I wish I have a feeling we won’t get anything from this


48 posted on 03/22/2011 12:13:10 PM PDT by chevydude26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping


49 posted on 03/22/2011 12:13:10 PM PDT by porter_knorr (http://tinyurl.com/relief4japan Help for Japan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Pray he doesn’t obfuscate through to his re-election as Nixon did before he is derailed. Apparently, nearly 48% of the people on any given day think he is “approved”. Our side of the aisle remains impotent and silent, ignoring a mandate from the electorate to give ‘em hell and be noisey about it.

With the union pledged to destroy capitalism and disrupt any banking stablization efforts, it will be a rocky summer. The communists are bent on luring the middle class and the independent voters over to join them in the fight for balcanization and against wealth and prosperity, so redistribution can rule the day.


50 posted on 03/22/2011 12:13:31 PM PDT by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson