Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mad Magazine Dishes on Obama’s Birthplace
fox ^ | 3/23/11 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/23/2011 5:53:42 PM PDT by Nachum

Lawsuits have claimed Barack Obama fails the Constitution's eligibility test for presidents because his father was a Kenyan, because he was born overseas and because his original long-form birth certificate has been withheld.

Mad magazine, now, has released its solution: His birthplace is "wherever it was he was born."

The magazine, in an article "How Barack Obama stacks up to the other 42 presidents," also takes jabs at Obama's dependence on Teleprompters, his middle name (Hussein), his busted lip and his onetime pastor, Jeremiah Wright.

While George Washington's "head was carved into Mt. Rushmore, Obama's head was sculpted into a Chia Pet," the article starts. Then, John Adams "got lost on his way to go live in the White House. Obama successfully reached the White House, but has been lost ever since."

(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: certifigate; dishes; mad; magazine; naturalborncitizen; obamas
... His birthplace is "wherever it was he was born."
1 posted on 03/23/2011 5:53:52 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ouch! Has Mad gone right wing? I’ll have to subscribe - first time since I was about thirteen years old.


2 posted on 03/23/2011 6:03:39 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

They spare no one :). I am getting a copy!


3 posted on 03/23/2011 6:05:17 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I hope they totally ran with it. Ridicule is one of the only weapons we have left.


4 posted on 03/23/2011 6:05:32 PM PDT by pingman (You can lead a liberal to logic, but you can't make them think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
It's not the first time Mad has dissed Zero.


5 posted on 03/23/2011 6:19:36 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Though “Mad” will never regain the heights it reached with the immortal Don Martin it looks pretty damn funny.


6 posted on 03/23/2011 6:24:51 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
MAD MAGAZINE COVER
7 posted on 03/23/2011 6:27:15 PM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Great, price of these issues just hit about forty bucks.


8 posted on 03/23/2011 6:30:20 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Love it!! Thanks for posting.


9 posted on 03/23/2011 6:32:54 PM PDT by MissMack99 (Mitt Romney is a FRAUD, he RUINED Mass. Don't let him finish Obama's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I may have to try to pick up a copy at the bookstore news stand. ahaha


10 posted on 03/23/2011 6:33:33 PM PDT by Qwackertoo (New Day In America November 03, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Has Mad gone right wing?

Mad has always jabbed at everyone. Like South Park, I don't mind them digging on our side because I know they are equal opportunity offenders.

11 posted on 03/23/2011 6:43:34 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
“...have claimed Barack Obama fails the Constitution's eligibility test for presidents because his father was a Kenyan...”

Mad Magazine has clearly not been so effected by the agitprop directing those who haven't yet read our framers or current congressional documents relating to presidential eligibility, SB 2678 and SR 511. No one, of course, has seen the mysterious non-documents, and rumors have been augmented by Obama’s use of his Kenyan father's exotic origins to augment Junior's thin credentials. Remember, it was the left who were all over McCain's eligibility problems, problems for which most citizens would like to see a constitutional amendment. Most conservatives, and probably, liberals as well, believe a carefully crafted amendment could achieve the goal of our framers and founders to protect us from foreign intrigue.

It was famous private airplane owner, and slumlord, Claire McCasklill, who, along with Obama, filed a bill to pass a law addressing McCain's eligibility problems - “A Bill to Insure That Foreign Born Children of Citizens in the Military are Eligible be President of the U.S.” That was SB 2678, Feb 2008.

Implying that McCain was eligible, when he wasn't, silenced Republicans, all of whom were afraid of the repercussions of challenging Obama’s eligibility, though every Senator knew the truth, having signed McCaskill and Leahy’s SR 511, in which Leahy agreed with Judge Michael Chertoff:

“My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen>/b>,” Chertoff replied. “That is mine, too,” said Leahy.” (Congressional Record, Judicial Committee Hearings on SR 511)

What will have caused more damage, the exposure of the constitutional ineligibility of the man in office, or the attempted destruction of our economic system and our role as the protector of individual as distinct from ‘collective’ freedoms advocated by Marxists? As improbable as it sounds, unless we all agree to ignore the Constitution, as Obama's team has, again and again, no bill with Obama's signature is a valid contract.

12 posted on 03/23/2011 6:46:15 PM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

How long have you read Mad? I’ve been reading it since about 1960 and I can assure you that Mad was quite left wing. My mom always allowed us to have it because it was genuinely funny and had lots of non-political humor (oh, those movie parodies!) but she always called it a commie rag, lol! The magazine became absolutely unreadable during the Viet Nam War. It’s no surprise that the oleoginous Tom Hayden is quoted as saying Mad was his first introduction to revolution! What shocks me is that the grey, humorless Hayden could even understand a funny magazine like that.

I wish we still had our Alfred E. Newman bobble-head doll which sat in the back window of our old Chevie in the early 60s.


13 posted on 03/23/2011 7:00:23 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Oh, how I loved Don Martin! I still have several paperbacks: Don Martin Strikes Back!


14 posted on 03/23/2011 7:02:23 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

ping


15 posted on 03/23/2011 7:10:25 PM PDT by stylecouncilor (What Would Jim Thompson Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor
Lots of funny comments at the website.

"Lincoln was a skinny lawyer - Obama is a skinny lawyer

Lincoln was a great American - Obama is a skinny lawyer"

16 posted on 03/23/2011 7:23:45 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

LOL!!


17 posted on 03/23/2011 7:24:33 PM PDT by stylecouncilor (What Would Jim Thompson Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

18 posted on 03/23/2011 7:40:45 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you gotta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

I still remember staring at the January 1961 issue in the grocery store. It was designed so that you could turn the 1961 upside down to read 1961 again.


19 posted on 03/23/2011 7:44:58 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Mad

20 posted on 03/23/2011 8:36:25 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding
Does anyone else think that it is just oh so coincidental that both presidential candidates had "eligibility issues" last election cycle? Obama couldn't hardly have asked for a more perfectly matched opponent, could he?
21 posted on 03/23/2011 9:27:19 PM PDT by zeugma (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding
Most conservatives, and probably, liberals as well, believe a carefully crafted amendment could achieve the goal of our framers and founders to protect us from foreign intrigue.
This conservative certainly would like to see a "carefully crafted amendment" proposal. The trouble is, we already have a prohibition

Article 1 Section 9:

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
By law, gifts to the POTUS are gifts to the U.S. government, not the person. It should have needed an act of Congress to entitle Mr. Obama to accept any honor, let alone a million bucks, from the government of Norway - or any body which is a creature thereof. Which is precisely the mechanism that Alfred Nobel's will provides for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize.

Not only Obama, but Theodore Roosevelt before him, accepted the Nobel Prize without a by-your-leave to Congress. It is for America, and not for the government of Norway, to pass judgement on our elected (or appointed) officials.
Theodore Roosevelt promised to use his prize money charitably, and Obama has done the same - promised, that is. TR never followed through on that promise. What exactly has Obama done with the million bucks?

But that is the least of it, as you have implied. How do we amend the Constitution in such a way as to cause the Constitution to be taken seriously? 'Tis a puzzlement.

And that is why, when people speak of constitutional amendments for this or that specific thing (e.g., defense of marriage) which actually should require no further constitutional language, my response is always to ask what might be done to modify the incentives facing SCOTUS. One fantasy of mine would be a constitutional amendment which did precisely nothing - nothing but fire a shot across the bow of SCOTUS by stipulating that the current members of the Court, by name, are the members of the Court. That action would do nothing - except make the point that the states actually do have the authority above that of SCOTUS. All it would take would be majority votes in 38 states . . .


22 posted on 03/24/2011 2:07:33 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson