This is an outrage!
To: Daisyjane69; holdonnow
2 posted on
03/26/2011 1:54:48 AM PDT by
Daisyjane69
(Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
To: Daisyjane69
It is actually worse than that. SCOTUS ruled in Flemming v. Nestor that we have no “right” to SS benefits and that Congress could repeal the Act altogether.
The SCOTUS makes no mention of what the consequences of repealing the Act might be. I think it would make all the protests in the Middle East look like a church social.
3 posted on
03/26/2011 2:20:15 AM PDT by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: Daisyjane69
Part of the problem -- maybe the problem -- is that too many people don't understand how the system is supposed to work. They've grown up thinking that, yeah, the judges are the ones that make the rules. Lots of blame can be heaped on the abyssmal state of public education, but much of it is the fault of Congress/legislatures who don't want to risk making decisions that will cost them votes. They're just as happy to shirk their duty and punt it over to the courts. One big vicious circle that isn't going to lead anywhere good.
9 posted on
03/26/2011 5:19:38 AM PDT by
workerbee
(We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson