Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamas National Security Strategy
whitehouse.gov ^ | May 2010 | White House

Posted on 03/26/2011 6:44:35 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

SNIP

Disrupt, Dismantle, and Defeat Al-Qa’ida and its Violent Extremist Affiliates in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Around the World The United States is waging a global campaign against al-Qa’ida and its terrorist affiliates. To disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qa’ida and its affiliates, we are pursuing a strategy that protects our homeland, secures the world’s most dangerous weapons and material, denies al-Qa’ida safe haven, and builds positive partnerships with Muslim communities around the world. Success requires a broad, sustained, and integrated campaign that judiciously applies every tool of American power—both military and civilian—as well as the concerted efforts of like-minded states and multilateral institutions.

We will always seek to delegitimize the use of terrorism and to isolate those who carry it out. Yet this is not a global war against a tactic—terrorism or a religion—Islam. We are at war with a specific network, al-Qa’ida, and its terrorist affiliates who support efforts to attack the United States, our allies, and partners.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at whitehouse.gov ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; nsp; nss
I invite you all to read and cite examples of discrepencies the Obama admin has with his own policy.
1 posted on 03/26/2011 6:44:41 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

WTF is the briefest way to describe the great leader’s (nobama) foreign policy. WTF?


2 posted on 03/26/2011 6:50:06 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

AND exactly how does that creature in the WH determine who the rebels in Libya are? They couldn’t possibly be Al Queda, could they? Good grief - we could hire the local dog catcher to do a better job of determining who our real enemies are than this jerk. I’m running out of words to call him - HELP!


3 posted on 03/26/2011 6:55:34 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

Putz might do. Maybe destructive sociopath?


4 posted on 03/26/2011 6:56:30 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

What Barry should say is “As a Muzzie lovin Commie I am trying to establish a policy of destroying the US National Security so my Muslim brothers can infiltrate our society, establish Sharia law and get rid of all of you Dhimmis.”


5 posted on 03/26/2011 6:58:17 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

...Disrupt, Dismantle, and Defeat America, Western Civilization , its Allies and Global Affiliates?

... To ally with Americas enemies to compound the demise?

....To align himself, the Anti President with his childhood values of Indonesia?


6 posted on 03/26/2011 7:02:08 PM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush
They couldn’t possibly be Al Queda, could they?

Libyan Rebel Commander claims that they are.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2695000/posts

7 posted on 03/26/2011 7:22:10 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
I invite you all to read and cite examples of discrepencies the Obama admin has with his own policy.

That's easy to do.

And, I doubt Obama has read the entire manuscript - with the exception of the content above where he signed, which is at end of the abstract (or first 2 pages) of the manuscript (62 pages).

8 posted on 03/26/2011 8:04:35 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

Agreed.


9 posted on 03/26/2011 8:05:44 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

He has a policy?


10 posted on 03/26/2011 9:53:42 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
We are at war with a specific network, al-Qa’ida, and its terrorist affiliates who support efforts to attack the United States, our allies, and partners.

Except those al-Qa'ida rebels against Gaddafi, right? We'll just ignore that. Other terror groups are fine with us too.

All they need to add is "let me be clear" and WTF.

11 posted on 03/27/2011 2:52:38 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Let me be clear, Mr President: the UN is not the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson