Skip to comments.The Incoherence of Federal Sex Policy: Title X, Medicaid, and the Eisenstadt Decision
Posted on 03/28/2011 3:29:21 PM PDT by Mary Kochan
There is a fundamental incoherence in federal policy, which limits the rights of the states to regulate or even influence norms of sexual behavior while at the same time assigns to itself the right to spend billions of taxpayer dollars to influence those norms at the state, local, and individual lev...
(Excerpt) Read more at catholiclane.com ...
The government can’t practically ban everything that is bad, only the worst things. Most of the onus for living right in a free society is on people’s personal morality. Even though they could in principle get contraceptives with an eye to using them for intercourse while unmarried, a moral populace would refuse to do it.
"must be available"
By law that means the providers are engaging in criminal conspiracy to further the crime of statutory rape.
Until we CHANGE the age of consent laws, such interaction between a government official and a minor under the age of consent is purely an offense corrupting a minor. SEICUS' sex positive agenda (make it with anyone, anywhere, anytime regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s)) be damned.
The media and government seem preoccupied with the number of births to teenage “mothers”. The number of teen pregnancies that end in abortion are of no concern. “Didn’t happen”. Or at least pretend it didn’t.
And the sex positive agenda is decidedly AMORAL, it seeks to end ALL moral judgments over ALL sexual pairings. Condoms in schools was NOT about ending teen pregnancy or ending the spread of VD (specifically AIDS), it was about ending the argument over IF teens should be having sex. Sex positive advocates believe that everyone should be sexually active at every age, it’s a “birthright”.
Hard to make the “moral” argument in public schools when our tax dollars are funding a series of programs in schools, hospitals, and advocacy groups to BASH all morality with regards to sex. They even call religious (read Christian) traditions to be “sex negative”.
People have free will, there exists a liberal culture (established in the seats of education, government, and media post-WWII and growing since 1968) that indoctrinates a poisoned message. Subverted the culture. Mocked the institutions of church and marriage. Bill Ayers said (see the Sept 11, 2001 NY Times piece) that he engaged in partner swapping and homosexuality with other members of the Weather Underground to “smash monogamy”.
There is a culture war being waged and liberals are openly hostile to the culture that came before theirs.
The government banning things is not the issue here. The government promoting and subsidizing things is.
Ayers’ little teapot tantrum couldn’t smash anything but that little group of souls, many of whom doubtless feel very much used today. It’s when the norms and expectations of America at large were rewritten in the face of their complacency that it got in trouble.
Ayers has been working as an educrat. He hasn’t been idle.
Unelected Communist sympathizers like Ayers infiltrated our education system. They are unaccountable to the public but still spread their own anti-American agenda.
I know he’s a raving lefty in some university in my great state of Ill-Noise, but wasn’t aware he was telling his classes “hey, look, be a shameless swinger like me.” Not to say I believe it impossible but that sounds so hippies era. I must be getting jaded.
It is cultural Marxism designed by Marcuse and his friends to destroy Christianity and the natural family. It is to destroy our culture so they can redesign man (God be d*mned). They want no restraints on sex. I personally think it is to create pederasty as normal, as it was in ancient pagan days and as exists in Afghanistan.
Sodomy and pederasty is common in muslim society...They are very positive about “that” “religion”. It is totalitarian...and that is the type of society they will create. A few masters and masses of slaves. Homosexuality is always rife with pederasty just like Afghanistan. That is the elephant in the Catholic closet—which is being intentionally covered up. The only allowed political correctness is “homosexuality is good and should have special status”. This is cultural marxism and so with that you can guarantee that man/boy sex will be next. It is a learned behavior and they prefer to have young partners because then they don’t have to be the “passive” partner.
Sex Ed is designed by cultural Marxists. It takes morality out of the sex act. Remove all mystery and beauty and make the sex act meaningless—nothing more than a commodity that can be used as casually as any other thing. It is to destroy the concept of God and dignity in human beings and a divine order and laws of nature (all logic and reason.) It reduces man to animal instincts and makes it easier to condition people into being exterminated....but of course they use “nice” words as all marxists do, “pro-choice” Euthanasia, etc.
Freud stated that “civilization is built on blocked, redirected and channeled sexual impulse, because men will work for sex.” Remove the restraint on sexual morality and all cultures will devolve into chaos. Utopia (Brave New World) and erotic paradise is nothing but illusion because all it produces is total destruction of all relationships, destruction of permanence and emotional health and safety from abuse for all children. It creates shattered egos, bodies and minds and people end up acting on emotions rather than intellect. Narcissism and lust always destroys cultures and sex without commitment is just that. Without trust, you can not have a successful economy or relationships.
That is why our homosexual, muslim/marxist president wants Sex Ed put in Kindergarten. Also “bullying” is used to sexualize young children. Although most bullying is done on account of physical looks, they will make it a sex issue, so they can condition children into thinking sex is nothing special—meaningless, no matter what you do....and to convince them they are homosexual because in the latency period, boys prefer boys and girls/girls which is necessary for healthy normal sexual identities.
This is the society (notice the military) that zero wants to force on our society—as do all the cultural Marxists. It is particularly ugly for women and children.:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.