Skip to comments.Schultz: 'Are You With The Terrorists, Or Are You With The President Of The United States?'
Posted on 03/30/2011 6:01:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
What's next: MSNBC hawking "America: Love It Or Leave It" bumper stickers?
The new fashion among the liberal network's anchors is to accuse critics of President Obama's Libya policy of being unpatriotic. Last week, we documented how Cenk Uygur did it. Now, it's Ed Schultz's turn. The man recently relegated to the 10 PM slot went on an extended rant last night, repeatedly accusing Republican critics of the Libyan operation of being unpatriotic. Schultz set the tone with his opening graphic. As you see in the screengrab, he branded Sarah Palin and John Bolton as "patriots, not" for questioning the president's conduct of the attack on Libya. But Schultz was far--far--from finished.
View video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Schultz’s mind-boggling dissent-is-unpatriotic rant. Ping to Today show list.
At least Sergeant Schultz of the old “Hogan’s Heroes” was in the military. This clown has no credentials.
PMSNBC should be embarrassed to cut him a paycheck for this absurd drivel.
I’m only sorry that Sarah Palin didn’t interpret the President’s speech on Facebook. She could have used the two words that I’ve heard for more than ten years from the libs:
I thought Dissent was patriotic???
When it comes to “Love It Or Leave It”, the RATs need to lead the way. I’ll sit back here clutching my guns and Bible to see where they end up.
Who the hell cares?
There have been few if any moments in the past 26 months when supporting Obama on any of his actions could have been considered even arguably patriotic. Entering Libya so late was a terrible decision. Entering early, before our enemies took complete control of the opposition would not have been terrible, and staying out would not have been terrible. Obama made the worst imaginable decision, as usual.
Shultz is as insane as Grayson.
If you’re a progressive, there would be no dissent.
We’d all be thinking the same thing, working the same way. You know, a real collective society.
What these bastards always forget is that there are quite a few that won’t work for the collective. The violence always comes when society fails and the productive refuse to work without incentive. Then comes the ‘purge’. Won’t be any different this time. Just spend some time on the ‘Red’ sites, They plan for violence. Stalin and Mao are their idols.
Thanks, Laz: yes, funny to see the man who never met a camera he didn’t like get caught.
Cameras, he likes. Phones, not so much. ;)
from the title I didn’t know if this would be fat Eddie or Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Both are idiots of the first magnitude and like their namesake “Sgt. Schultz” - they both “see nothing”.
Schultz’s show exists for one reason - to blindly shill for the Democratic party. His Democratic (at that time) senators from ND solicited the MSNBC job for him.
The parade of Marxism only marches in one direction, comrade.
We still know little about the group we cast our lot with in Libya, I would venture to say that a healthy percentage would happily due us harm if given the opportunity.
...And not a very good one. I honestly don't understand how this guy keeps the tv gig. He's dreadful. Dumb, misinformed, tries to work Rush's shtick, full on outrage over everything. His radio show is equally as bad, but at least you don't see him.
Every time I see this fool I remember him calling out Dennis Prager for standing up for Bill Bennett (re: racism/black babies remarks). He demanded a debate with Prager. Prager heard about it and accepted on the spot. Then widdle Eddie found out that Prager is one of the smartest guys on the debate circuit and ran for the hills. It was pathetic. Although the way Dennis kept on him by everyday saying that he was ready to debate, would pay his own way, that Ed could chose the moderator was GREAT. Exposed the coward in a big way.
Uh Shultzie, if you do any proofreading I think you will find the “the president of the United States is for the terrorists”.
Are You With The Terrorists, Or Are You With The President Of The United States?
The real question is the President with the terrorist, and not with the United States.....ED you have the question bassackwards.....LOL
Needs to be kept for when President Palin is in office.
Clearly, a false dichotomy. Both sides are terrorists. Daffy sanctions terrorism, and the rebel include Al-Qaeda. So supporting either side is supporting terrorism.
The big difference in my mind is that Daffy is a secularist that sometimes yields to the radical Muslims, but can be persuaded out of terrorism (for instance, giving up his nuke materials), whereas Al-Qaeda are the radical Muslims.
In this instance, I modestly propose a third option: Shoot 'em all and let God sort 'em out.
correction: obama is with the terrorist.
until such time as obama can prove that both of his parents were U.S. citizens( natural born citizen) he is not the legal President of the United States. WE currently do not have a sitting President in the White House.
Spot on. And I'd propose a forth option: Let them shoot each other and let God sort it out.
The correct answer to the title (question) is, NO.
Even better. We don't put our people in harm's way.
Of course, in this scenario, whoever wins, Obama would say he always supported them, and it was his historic and unprecedented non-intervention that lead to their victory.
By using his reasoning, this talking turd supported the terrorists for all of Bush’s presidency.
‘Are You With The Terrorists, Or Are You With The President Of The United States?’
And the difference between the two are?.
True for all of MSNBC. When do we get our knee-jerk - conservatives only network? (it ain't Fox).
is that person a former pravda reporter from the cold war?
when it comes to obama, is there a difference between enemy of the USA and Obama?
I’m watching a lot less MSNBC since Olbermann got fired. It just doesn’t have the same entertainment value anymore. Matthews, Madcow, Crazy Larry, Schultz and his clone Stink Yugo just don’t give me the laughs Olbie and his Ted Baxter fake outrage did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.