Posted on 03/30/2011 6:01:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
What's next: MSNBC hawking "America: Love It Or Leave It" bumper stickers?
The new fashion among the liberal network's anchors is to accuse critics of President Obama's Libya policy of being unpatriotic. Last week, we documented how Cenk Uygur did it. Now, it's Ed Schultz's turn. The man recently relegated to the 10 PM slot went on an extended rant last night, repeatedly accusing Republican critics of the Libyan operation of being unpatriotic. Schultz set the tone with his opening graphic. As you see in the screengrab, he branded Sarah Palin and John Bolton as "patriots, not" for questioning the president's conduct of the attack on Libya. But Schultz was far--far--from finished.
View video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Uh Shultzie, if you do any proofreading I think you will find the “the president of the United States is for the terrorists”.
Are You With The Terrorists, Or Are You With The President Of The United States?
The real question is the President with the terrorist, and not with the United States.....ED you have the question bassackwards.....LOL
Needs to be kept for when President Palin is in office.
Clearly, a false dichotomy. Both sides are terrorists. Daffy sanctions terrorism, and the rebel include Al-Qaeda. So supporting either side is supporting terrorism.
The big difference in my mind is that Daffy is a secularist that sometimes yields to the radical Muslims, but can be persuaded out of terrorism (for instance, giving up his nuke materials), whereas Al-Qaeda are the radical Muslims.
In this instance, I modestly propose a third option: Shoot 'em all and let God sort 'em out.
correction: obama is with the terrorist.
until such time as obama can prove that both of his parents were U.S. citizens( natural born citizen) he is not the legal President of the United States. WE currently do not have a sitting President in the White House.
Spot on. And I'd propose a forth option: Let them shoot each other and let God sort it out.
The correct answer to the title (question) is, NO.
Even better. We don't put our people in harm's way.
Of course, in this scenario, whoever wins, Obama would say he always supported them, and it was his historic and unprecedented non-intervention that lead to their victory.
By using his reasoning, this talking turd supported the terrorists for all of Bush’s presidency.
‘Are You With The Terrorists, Or Are You With The President Of The United States?’
And the difference between the two are?.
True for all of MSNBC. When do we get our knee-jerk - conservatives only network? (it ain't Fox).
is that person a former pravda reporter from the cold war?
when it comes to obama, is there a difference between enemy of the USA and Obama?
I’m watching a lot less MSNBC since Olbermann got fired. It just doesn’t have the same entertainment value anymore. Matthews, Madcow, Crazy Larry, Schultz and his clone Stink Yugo just don’t give me the laughs Olbie and his Ted Baxter fake outrage did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.