Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9th Circuit Court to hear eligibility questions
World Net Daily ^ | March 30, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/30/2011 9:01:16 PM PDT by circumbendibus

Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama's eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.

Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals – members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president – that oral arguments will be held May 2.

"I can't believe it, but after two years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of appeals scheduled oral argument in [the] Obama case," wrote Orly Taitz, a California attorney who has litigated a number of challenges to Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircus; andrebirottejr; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; davidcarter; daviddejute; eligibility; kreep; naturalborncitizen; obama; rogerwest; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-225 next last
The Taitz/Kreep case to remove the usurper gains some traction.
1 posted on 03/30/2011 9:01:19 PM PDT by circumbendibus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; rxsid; Red Steel; Seizethecarp; Danae; TheConservativeParty

PING!!!


2 posted on 03/30/2011 9:03:21 PM PDT by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Hope they consider the false SSN Obama has been using:

http://randysright.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/obamas-ss-042-68-4425/


3 posted on 03/30/2011 9:03:49 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
9th circuit?
9th circuit, you say?

Oh, the suspense is killing me.[/s]

4 posted on 03/30/2011 9:03:49 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
First I was happy, but then I saw "9th Circuit".

I am glad Orly and Kreep are working together. Was hoping they might do that way back. . . Maybe Justice will be done.

5 posted on 03/30/2011 9:05:30 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

“The Taitz/Kreep case to remove the usurper gains some traction.”

You left off the sarcasm tag.


6 posted on 03/30/2011 9:05:38 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

Maybe the powers that be have realized Zero has NO chance of getting elected again. Hillary is doing well in the polls. Throw Barry under the bus??


7 posted on 03/30/2011 9:07:09 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

The lawyers who argue vs obama are taking their lives in their hands


8 posted on 03/30/2011 9:07:39 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
SCOTUS overturns from reflex without waking up.

The 9th Circus has a well-earned reputation.

/johnny

9 posted on 03/30/2011 9:07:49 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Recently filed court docs that show:

1. Social Security Administration says Obama’s SSN is invalid.

2. Obama was only at Columbia for 9 months (not the 2 years his official bio says).

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=20018


10 posted on 03/30/2011 9:08:09 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You don’t mean to suggest the 9th Circus might be in the tank for...whatever leftist argument they might happen to hear at any given time?


11 posted on 03/30/2011 9:08:28 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus


12 posted on 03/30/2011 9:09:04 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

“the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals” ....................................... Riiiight! Fugitboutit.


13 posted on 03/30/2011 9:09:48 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (The dark clouds of 1939' are appoaching us again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

But in the 9th Circus? Good luck with that...


14 posted on 03/30/2011 9:10:36 PM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Orly Taitz is an incompetant. That is why they are hearing it.

Gauranteed loss that the left can then claim settles the matter.


15 posted on 03/30/2011 9:13:37 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals – members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president – that oral arguments will be held May 2.

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ... isn't that Court of Appeals based in San Fransisco and made up of warmed over hippies left over from the Haight-Ashbury days of 1967-68?

16 posted on 03/30/2011 9:14:16 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; holdonnow; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP


17 posted on 03/30/2011 9:16:31 PM PDT by devolve (. . . . . . . . . . . . The gasoline is too damned high! . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

They’re trying to lull us....

(Keep talking, Donald. You may be Obiwan...our ONLY hope.)


18 posted on 03/30/2011 9:19:21 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Thanks for posting the link. The First Amended Complaint is simply breathtaking in listing all the inconsistencies and outright lies about Obama. Para 11 lists YET ANOTHER alias for the alien: “Soebarkah”

The creep has as many names as he has SS Numbers.


19 posted on 03/30/2011 9:20:07 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
We can be assured of the following: If they can take a position against America, they will. If they had the authority to dissolve Congress, they would. If they could give California back to Mexico, they would. WAIT, giving California back to Mexico might not be such a bad idea (just kidding).
20 posted on 03/30/2011 9:20:26 PM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Throw Barry under the bus??

Maybe. Look at all the talk on TV and the radio in the last two weeks. It's almost as if they got the green light. Eligibility talk on The View? No way. Hannity talking about it, Trump almost ad nauseum, newspapers covering it, it's all over the web, info about the SS coming up again. All very interesting.

I hope some day 'Natural Born Citizen' gets defined finally by SCOTUS as "Two US born parents have a child on US Soil. Said child is a Natural Born Citizen." There, simple. Why can't they rule on that?

21 posted on 03/30/2011 9:21:28 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

Gary Kreep is quite capable.


22 posted on 03/30/2011 9:21:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reader25

Well, I vote we SELL California to the Chinese!


23 posted on 03/30/2011 9:22:34 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Para 29: In 1981-1982 Pakistan was ruled by a ruthless radical Muslim leader general Zia Ul Hac, who came to power as a result of a military coup, announced himself as a Chief Martial Law Administrator and ruled the country via the system of iron fist terror. Supreme court of Pakistan, apparently afraid for their lives found such rule to be acceptable due to a “necessity” doctrine. Based on verification of Columbia university records, Taitz found that Obama spent at least a year within the regime of general Zia Ul Hac. This revelation adds urgency in processing this complaint, as it shows that we have today an individual usurping the position of the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the whole US military, while using a stolen social security number, not possessing a valid long form U.S. birth certificate and defrauding the nation and concealing a whole year of his whereabouts.

Go, Orly!! She is amazing.

24 posted on 03/30/2011 9:27:05 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Wiley Drake eligibility Ping!

PING-WIMPY-CLAPPER2sm
A National Embarrassment

He bamboozled millions... gave us the old 'okee doke.

25 posted on 03/30/2011 9:28:56 PM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Maybe Trump got word this was moving forward and got out in front.


26 posted on 03/30/2011 9:34:25 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Those Who Worship Him will all bow down and say "Yes, we can!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"Oh, the suspense is killing me.[/s] "

Oddly, sometimes the 9th surprises EVERYONE. Their last big ruling was to essentially "incorporate" the USSC ruling on the Second Amendment within it's jurisdiction.

Was the the McDonald case?...well, something about gun shows in the Bay Area.

Still, that the even took this case is a major lift in stature and allows the USSC to hear the appeal without stepping outside normal protocol.

27 posted on 03/30/2011 9:34:27 PM PDT by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

I have a question for anyone who can answer this. IF the 9th ciruit, (see tagline,) rules on this, for or against, doesn’t this mean that the Supreme Court will have to hear it if it is appealed, or can they just refuse to hear it...again.


28 posted on 03/30/2011 9:34:35 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Note: I do NOT capitalize anything I don't respect...like obama and/or islam...but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Americans were prohibited from traveling to Pakistan at that time. The fact Obama visited the country shows he was traveling using the passport of another nation. Likely it was Indonesian as his step father listed him as a citizen of that nation on the school registry.

Btw, Indonesia did NOT allow dual citizenship. Stanley Ann and Barry would have to have renounced U.S. Citizenship to live there. That’s why, with help of Bill Ayers most likely, Zero had to invent the new identity here in the U.S. Or with the help of his grandfather who worked for the CIA under the front of a furniture company.


29 posted on 03/30/2011 9:35:55 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

USSC doesn’t have to hear anything they don’t want to. They can let the 9th Circuit decision stand, whatever it is.


30 posted on 03/30/2011 9:38:53 PM PDT by Patrick1 ("The problem with Internet quotations is that many are not genuine." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

One of the eligibility cases sites common law that has a different view. They tossed it in but booted the case on the issue of no standing.


31 posted on 03/30/2011 9:39:10 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama's eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.

This case from 2008, Judge Carter's case, thought to be dead is being revived by the 9th Circus. Something I'd say rarely happens...if ever.

32 posted on 03/30/2011 9:43:38 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

9th circuit?
9th circuit, you say?
Oh, the suspense is killing me.[/s]


Me, too.


33 posted on 03/30/2011 9:47:21 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

“Para 29: In 1981-1982 Pakistan was ruled by a ruthless radical Muslim leader general Zia Ul Hac, who came to power as a result of a military coup, announced himself as a Chief Martial Law Administrator and ruled the country via the system of iron fist terror. Supreme court of Pakistan, apparently afraid for their lives found such rule to be acceptable due to a “necessity” doctrine.”

Why that is odd, considering that in 1981 the Reagan Administration approved the sale 34 of F-16’s to Pakistan.

“But the election of Ronald Reagan as president of the United States in 1980 would change that. Reagan, a Republican who rejected the previous administration’s strategy of détente and would later order a massive buildup of the U.S. military, approved the sale of F-16s to Pakistan shortly after he entered the Oval Office in 1981. That year, the U.S. government agreed to sell 34 General Dynamics F-16A and 12 F-16B “Fighting Falcon” aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force. The jets were delivered under the “Peace Gate” foreign military sales program – the first six were delivered in 1983 under “Peace Gate I,” and the remaining 34 arrived over the next three years, under the “Peace Gate II” program.”

http://www.indusbusinessjournal.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=E990A8AF0A07484782B93ADDC8FD9249&AudID=F1B696626A8943B7B50052A323677014


34 posted on 03/30/2011 9:47:31 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

“Americans were prohibited from traveling to Pakistan at that time.”

That is complete nonsense.


35 posted on 03/30/2011 9:48:38 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; LucyT; rxsid; Seizethecarp; Danae; TheConservativeParty; circumbendibus
This case from 2008, Judge Carter's case, thought to be dead is being revived by the 9th Circus. Something I'd say rarely happens...if ever.

VERY interesting!

If it's such a rare thing, I wonder why it's happening... now?

36 posted on 03/30/2011 9:52:08 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

9th Circus = fix is in.


37 posted on 03/30/2011 9:56:34 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

Well... I don’t have much hope from the 9th...

That being said, from another thread I posted on:

Yo, Bill O’Reily, explain how a man born under the British Nationality Act of 1948 can be a Natural born Citizen of the US. what law is that? Answer: THERE IS NONE!! It isn’t possible.
Natural Born citizenship DOES NOT mean born in the united states. It means being born under the SOLE JURISDICTION of the United States!!

Yea, two parents that are citizens and born here is SOLE JURISDICTION - no other nation involved is there?

It isn’t rocket science or theoretical physics for Heavens sake!! It isn’t that hard to get!!!!!! For the love of peat.... People are SO STUPID nowadays!!! It’s a simple concept!


38 posted on 03/30/2011 9:57:08 PM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Oh my goodness, See the link at post number 10.,,,,Soebarkah????

“11. Recently released passport records of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, show that Obama was listed in her passport under a name Soebarkah. Exhibit 6”


39 posted on 03/30/2011 9:58:56 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

Except that the Supremes will probably do something stupid like rule that anyone born on US soil-no matter if their parents are only here for 5 minutes before birth- is automatically a US citizen....


40 posted on 03/30/2011 10:00:35 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Here’s a photo of Obama in the 3rd grade in Indonesia.

Well... Obama SAYS that’s where he was at the time. Problem, he was in Hawaii:

http://theobamadiary.com/2009/12/29/scott-barry-3rd-grade-1969/


41 posted on 03/30/2011 10:01:07 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

Sotoero/Hussein/Soebarkah!?!?!?

OFGoshS!!


42 posted on 03/30/2011 10:01:48 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
This case from 2008, Judge Carter's case,....

Make that January 20th, 2009 inauguration day when Obama was served.

If it's such a rare thing, I wonder why it's happening... now?

Much media play thanks to Trump.

43 posted on 03/30/2011 10:01:54 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Hillary is doing well in the polls.

Very well. She's probably the most popular politician in the country. Just in case anyone thought their fellow Americans were wising up... not so much. If anything, they're getting dumber.

The polling does put HRC-booster Donald Trump's recent outspokenness into perspective, though.

44 posted on 03/30/2011 10:06:23 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

>> Oh, the suspense is killing me.[/s]

Exactly.


45 posted on 03/30/2011 10:07:37 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Bump for your link. Cashill is great.


46 posted on 03/30/2011 10:08:35 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reddy
Except that the Supremes will probably do something stupid like rule that anyone born on US soil-no matter if their parents are only here for 5 minutes before birth- is automatically a US citizen....

Let's hope not. Still think this will eventually be heard by SCOTUS - as it most certainly should have been in January, 2009 before the Electoral College vote. . .

47 posted on 03/30/2011 10:09:10 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Okay, sorry for the sidebar:

Obama was born in 1961.

He’s 10 years old and in the 3rd grade here:

http://joytiz.com/2009/obama-ten-year-old-third-grader/

That puts him TWO YEARS behind schedule. Not surprising with his mother carting him off to 3rd world countries but hardly fitting the ‘brilliant anointed one” image:

http://www.explo.org/files/html/agegrade.html

So when did he finish high school?

1979 but no record support this?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_Barack_Obama_graduate_from_high_school

But the school says 1979:

http://www.punahou.edu/page.cfm?p=1786

How did he go from 3rd grade at age 10 (2 years behind) to graduating on time?

Guess he was learning fast...


48 posted on 03/30/2011 10:14:42 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Also, if he’s 10 in 1969, that means he was born in 1959. Got a problem for eligibility as that’d place him pre-statehood.


49 posted on 03/30/2011 10:17:09 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

“Also, if he’s 10 in 1969, that means he was born in 1959. Got a problem for eligibility as that’d place him pre-statehood.”

Nonsense.


50 posted on 03/30/2011 10:19:29 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson