Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit seeks dissolution of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton, Chattahoochee Hills
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | March 28, 2011 | Katie Leslie

Posted on 03/31/2011 5:24:06 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit Monday against the state of Georgia seeking to dissolve the city charters of Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. Further, the lawmakers, joined by civil rights leader the Rev. Joseph Lowery, aim to dash any hopes of a Milton County.

The lawsuit, filed in a North Georgia U.S. District Court Monday, claims that the state circumvented the normal legislative process and set aside its own criteria when creating the “super-majority white ” cities within Fulton and DeKalb counties. The result, it argues, is to dilute minority votes in those areas, violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

“This suit is based on the idea that African Americans and other minorities can elect the people of their choice,” said Democratic State Sen. Vincent Fort.

The Office of the Governor and the Office of the Attorney General declined comment pending further review of the case.

Rep. Lynne Riley, R-Johns Creek, called the lawsuit “frivolous” and “disrespectful to the citizens of these cities who are most satisfied with their government.”

Riley was active in creating Sandy Springs and the subsequent cities while serving as a Fulton County commissioner.

“These jurisdictions were based on geography and nothing else,” she said. “We haven’t seen any evidence of any disadvantage based on the creation of new cities. We’ve watched the Fulton County budget continue to grow … to say there was damage done by this creation, there are no facts to support that, and I would reject it.”

Lead attorney Jerome Lee, of Taylor Lee & Associates, said the suit is novel.

“The Voting Rights Act forbids a state from doing anything that affects the voting rights of minorities, except with a permissible purpose,” he said, citing the redistricting that takes place when the census documents population shifts. “In this case, it’s different because the state actually went outside the normal redistricting process and created these cities that have no meaningful state purpose.”

According to the 2010 census, Fulton County is 44.5 percent white and 44.1 percent black. About 54 percent of DeKalb County residents are black, and 33.3 percent are white.

Sandy Springs, created in 2005, is 65 percent white and 20 percent black. Milton, formed a year later, is 76.6 percent white and 9 percent black. Johns Creek, also formed that year, is 63.5 percent white and 9.2 percent black. Chattahoochee Hills, formed in 2007, is 68.6 percent white and 28 percent black, while Dunwoody, created in 2008, is 69.8 percent white and 12.6 percent black.

Emory University law professor Michael Kang said the case is unique because the Voting Rights Act focuses on redistricting, whereas this lawsuit challenges the legality of cities. Kang, who has not reviewed the case in its entirety, said the plaintiffs will likely have to show evidence of discriminatory purpose to have a strong claim. Kane said the case has interesting implications.

“If we look at this realistically, there is some white flight going on. The creation of these Sandy Springs-type cities enables white voters to get away from black voters,” he said. “It does strike me that the Voting Rights Act might have something to say about this, but it’s unknown what the courts will say about it.”

Johns Creek Mayor Mike Bodker had not reviewed the suit, but he said he doesn’t believe it has merit.

“This discussion was debated even back then [when the city was formed], and it failed to pass muster back then, so I don’t know why it would be different today,” he said. “It seems the clock has run on this issue.”

Lee expressed hope that the involved parties could work out a compromise outside of dissolution of the cities.

“There is a fundamental issue here that needs to really be addressed. I don’t know who the person is to forge the path forward. In theory it’s our governor and commander in chief, but I don’t know if anyone is willing to risk the political capital necessary to sit down and hammer out a solution on this,” Lee said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; 15thamendment; blacks; cities; civilrights; holderspeople; lawsuit; lynneriley; votingrightsact; whites

1 posted on 03/31/2011 5:24:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

words fail me.... if a white tried this they would be hammered.... racism thy name is “social justice”


2 posted on 03/31/2011 5:28:36 PM PDT by SouthernBoyupNorth ("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthernBoyupNorth

Wouldn’t their entire argument be invalidated were these “super-white majority cities” to elect an eminently qualified black person to represent them? Most normal folks vote for the most qualified candidate for the position whereas blacks for the most part only vote for blacks irrespective of any and all qualifications. That, however, is not racism at all.


3 posted on 03/31/2011 5:53:00 PM PDT by RonInNaples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Georgia, tell the Federal court to f itself. I am sick of tyranny and I am not alone.
4 posted on 03/31/2011 6:38:24 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

unbelievable.

to what lengths will money hungry governments NOT go to steal our money? They’ll sue to rule cities illegal so the wealth of those cities is taxed by an “approved” municipality?

good grief.

and they wonder why they got trounced in 2010 in state and local elections.

just damn


5 posted on 03/31/2011 7:30:49 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
“If we look at this realistically, there is some white flight going on. The creation of these Sandy Springs-type cities enables white voters to get away from black voters,” he said. “It does strike me that the Voting Rights Act might have something to say about this, but it’s unknown what the courts will say about it.”(Michael King)

So what is he hinting at?
That it is “illegal” for white people to move out of large urban areas without a permit?

6 posted on 03/31/2011 7:36:56 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

So what is he hinting at?
That it is “illegal” for white people to move out of large urban areas without a permit?


I believe that IS what he is saying in ‘political speech’.

It becomes more and more evident that some of these people really do look at productive tax-payers as walking wallets and nothing more. Certainly not as people deserving their own representatives to speak for them in the “halls of power”.


7 posted on 04/01/2011 3:04:26 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson