Skip to comments.Cameron and Obama: Why are you supporting Al-Qaeda? (concrete and undeniable proof)
Posted on 03/31/2011 11:07:03 PM PDT by Libloather
Cameron and Obama: Why are you supporting Al-Qaeda?
We have concrete and undeniable proof that David Cameron and Barack Obama are cavorting with Al-Qaeda terrorists who have been actively involved in military campaigns against American and British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Why are they lying while trying to support those who fight against their countries? The Al-Qaeda link established, then...?
The accusation is serious but unfortunately true: Barack Obama has signed a secret document* allowing covert CIA operations in Libya against the Government of Muamar Al-Qathafi and in breach of international law. David Cameron is thinking about arming the Benghazi terrorists, who have links to Al-Qaeda. We present the proof - these men are traitors
If someone told you that your government was spending hundreds of millions of dollars in funding Al-Qaeda terrorists who had fought active campaigns against the troops of your own country, how would you feel and what would you do? If someone told you that you could not have an operation because the National Health Service did not have the funds, then promptly spent two million pounds in two hours attacking the authorities of a sovereign nation who were not targeting civilians, but indeed Al-Qaeda terrorists, how would you feel?
Well, people of the United States of America and the United Kingdom, I have some very serious and sad news for you. For the people of the USA, your President, Barack Obama, has * according to Sky News, which has just broken the news, signed a secret document several weeks ago giving the CIA permission for covert operations inside Libya in support of the Benghazi based "rebels", some of whom fought in Afghanistan against British and US troops.
(Excerpt) Read more at english.pravda.ru ...
I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
It seems the radical Muslims have an orchestrated plan at taking over the M.E., and have an excellent chance of accomplishing that goal.
Really? Are people still trying to push that “stand with the Muslims” quote? Of all the things to use against Obama, there’s no need to resort to lib tactics.
I think this whole thing is a lot of layers of nations and agencies being “played”. Like when you think you’re playing the other guy and he’s playing you, but really you knew his plan and you’re playing him, except he knew that and he’s playing you, etc.
pure speculation on my part...
It just seems like q told euros he was going to stop selling them oil and sell to china.
(real speculation here) In a whole separate thread and time schedule, the iranian-white-house-left-wing revolution was ready to move out of egypt and on to other targets. there’s a left-wing real back-back-back-door info flow of some kind (sort of hint-hint-nudge-nudge). dr. evil (left intelligentsia power people) plan is to have u.s. not intervene in the revolutions, let any nation fall. wh knows pretty much when it sees revolutions who it is, and they publicly brand it as democratic. america can’t argue that, prior admin started the precedent.
there are no written plans of this in fed’l gov’t other than supporting democratic change material, and the fact that we have these “cruel” “allies” at this point that we are pushing to reform.
so first reply to revolution out of some administration is what they know - we support our allies. wh suddenly blurts out that we support democracy and the ally is cruel. oops, now the memos go out; u.s. supports the rev. even better for dr. evil - u.s. might actually help on the evil side !
mubarak, terrorists won (he was old, he was confused).
now back to qdaffy, with the euros embarassed by him and now no oil !
revo in egypt wrapped up, time to move on to libya. are there back-door status reports flying around the world ? cables ? who knows. libyan revo starts. qdaffy, not so westernized, was much tougher nut to crack. when you see the revos on tv, they don’t seem like they’re fighting a war, but maybe playing football. not too stressed. when q’s forces dump some mortar fire on them, the run like nancies. that is no actual army, these are just dudes recruited by radicals. you can see they sit there firing guns in the air and they obviously it is a new experience for them. but the have a little air of confidence, and seem very surprised when they are attacked. it looks to my untrained eyes like they have been told that this is a pretend war, they just have to go and shoot a little, the jets will bomb, and they can just move in celebrate.
does anyone else see that, or do my eyes deceive me ?
have western agents coordinated with the revo leadership prior to the action starting ?
Hope and Change.... Tragic.
I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
I will stand with them should the MUSLIMS shift in an ugly direction.
Let Barack Hussein Obama speak for himself:
“The person who made me proudest of all though was my (half-brother), Roy. He was converted to Islam.” (DREAMS OF MY FATHER)
“In Indonesia, I spent two years at a Muslim school. . .I studied the Koran.” (DREAMS OF MY FATHER)
“Lolo (Obama’s stepfather) followed Islam. . .I looked to Lolo for guidance.” (AUDACITY OF HOPE)
” I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds of war shift in any ugly direction. . .” (AUDACITY OF HOPE)
“We are no longer just a Christian nation. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.” (INAUGURAL SPEECH)
Lord, protect our precious troops and us
Remember when Nicolas Kristof said of Obama here: “ Mr. Obama has spoken respectfully of Islam (he told me last year, on the record, that the Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on earth at sunset). Apparently it has been scrubbed from the New York Times web site
(Didn’t read far enough)
UPDATE: WAIT! Mind! Mind! Diana West emails me that she is a member of the NY Times (woo woo) and she still gets the “server error” message whe she tries to access the “one of the prettiest sounds” Kristof column. “what’s up with that indeed”?
UPDATE: It’s back!
I was a little Jakarta street kid, he said in a wide-ranging interview in his office (excerpts are on my blog, www.nytimes.com/ontheground).
He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school, but a president is less likely to stereotype Muslims as fanatics and more likely to be aware of their nationalism if he once studied the Koran with them.
Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (itll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.
...a large number of suicide bombers used against US and UK troops in Iraq came from Eastern Libya?
--Has anyone noticed the number of times they can be heard saying "Allahu Akhbar", and has anyone noticed practically all of them sport the Islamic beard?
--Does anyone know that in Libya they are referred to as "the bearded ones" and that they hate Muammar Al-Qathafi because he has called the Islamic veil "a tent", because he has spoken out against the stoning of women, because he has spoken out against the death penalty for homosexuals?
and the “Muslim call to prayer at sunset” is the prettiest thing he ever heard..then he goes off to recite it in perfect Arabic dialect to a NY Times reporter
At age 48, you do not perfectly recite in perfect dialet anything foreign you learned at age 9 or 10 unless it was regularly spoken as an adult
the opening lines of the call to prayer are an admonishment to Muslim and ‘non-believers’ alike that Muhammad is the main dude (intimidation of ‘non-believers’), and that prayer is better than sleep. In the Turkish anthem, a further verse talks about preventing ‘heathens’ from touching holy places.
The real american news now
Cameron’s excuse: oil.
What am I missing here? Obama did state he would back Islam over the rest of us. What is wrong with pointing out that statement?