Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krugman: The President Is Missing
NYTimes ^ | 4-10-11 | Krugman

Posted on 04/11/2011 5:19:48 AM PDT by tcrlaf

What have they done with President Obama? What happened to the inspirational figure his supporters thought they elected? Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: buyersremorse; krugman; obama; regret
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last
The Lamentations of the liberal man-women is music to my ears...

The same people who sold Obama to the public, can't figure out why he isn't the craven image they created of him.

It would be kinda funny, if it hadn't done so much damage to America.

1 posted on 04/11/2011 5:19:52 AM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Obama is a crook!


2 posted on 04/11/2011 5:21:51 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Obama Sucks and so do the RINOS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!

3 posted on 04/11/2011 5:22:30 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?

Indeed! That's what I'd like to know! The guy in the White House strikes me as some C or B college student who only got in through some sort of Affirmative Action deal. I'm not even sure he understands this country's founding principles, or our Constitution -- what is he? Some kind of foreigner??

It's most peculiar, Momma.

4 posted on 04/11/2011 5:24:20 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

It’s not Obama, the fault lies with TOTUS!


5 posted on 04/11/2011 5:26:59 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (President Obama’s approval ratings are so low now, Kenyans are accusing him of being born in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
"Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?"

Isn't it more then obvious by now? You can never be caught on the WRONG side of an issue if you take every side of the issue to begin with.

Ever notice how this fool always says "As I have said before...." and then goes on to repeat ONE of the sides he took at a certain point (depending on the polls at that time) on a given issue?

It's the same in general for the entire Left. If anything goes, as they seem to believe then you cannot be called to account for anything you do.

6 posted on 04/11/2011 5:27:23 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

To paraphrase G. Gordon Liddy from the 90’s...”Oh ye 52%...SUCKERS!”


7 posted on 04/11/2011 5:27:40 AM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lysandru

He’s the man who never really was.
A creation of the MSM, now found with no brain, no opinions, no nothing...


8 posted on 04/11/2011 5:31:38 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Oh, Paul...Don’t worry your pretty little head.
Your Ms Obambie is busy digging up that pesky old birth certificate, don’tcha know?
Life will be right as rain, just as soon as he finds it.


9 posted on 04/11/2011 5:32:15 AM PDT by AlexW (Proud to be a Birther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

His other favorite saying is
“It is absolutely true” before every single lie.


10 posted on 04/11/2011 5:32:32 AM PDT by midwyf (Wyoming Native. Environmentalism is a religion too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo
"Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?"

For those who have eyes to see, he is who he has always been. These libs are amazing at the blinders they wear.

11 posted on 04/11/2011 5:33:32 AM PDT by Matt Hatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

You elected an empty suit, what did you expect?


12 posted on 04/11/2011 5:33:50 AM PDT by Leofl (I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; All

If you listen to the lamentations coming from the left, they are all crying that this isn’t the President they thought they voted for.

The problem is, that President NEVER EXISTED, in the first place.

Obama was a media creation, a propaganda campaign that fed on itself. The media was so ginned-up by the International Answer crowd, and the Bush-Gore 2000 haters, that they were willing to accept ANYTHING that met the story line they had created.

They didn’t do their job, threw Hillary aside for this fairy tale story, and now they are paying a price for it.


13 posted on 04/11/2011 5:37:38 AM PDT by tcrlaf (2012 Slogan: "You'd Have To Be Insane, To Vote For Hussein!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; Siena Dreaming; paratrooper82; Marine_Uncle; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; ...
Krugman :”What have they done with President Obama? What happened to the inspirational figure his supporters thought they elected? (HE'S RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION YOU OVER EDUCATED IDIOT!) Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?

I realize that with hostile Republicans controlling the House, there’s not much Mr. Obama can get done in the way of concrete policy. Arguably, all he has left is the bully pulpit. But he isn’t even using that — or, rather, he’s using it to reinforce his enemies’ narrative. His remarks after last week’s budget deal were a case in point. Maybe that terrible deal, in which Republicans ended up getting more than their opening bid, was the best he could achieve — although it looks from here as if the president’s idea of how to bargain is to start by negotiating with himself, making pre-emptive concessions, then pursue a second round of negotiation with the G.O.P., leading to further concessions

You have to hear all the whining about Obama on the other side for a laugh if nothing else. I wish Krugman was on yesterday's This Week panel, it would have been really funny. Krugman is just a Marxist dressed up by liberals as an economist.

The President Is Missing By PAUL KRUGMAN (NYT Link)

More seriously, Obama will be on the counter-offensive on Wednesday with his budget plan.

14 posted on 04/11/2011 5:40:27 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

If dim-witted Krugman is figuring it out, Obama’s really in trouble.


15 posted on 04/11/2011 5:40:36 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
"Krugman: The Ppresident Is Missing"

Please...don't tease me.....
16 posted on 04/11/2011 5:40:45 AM PDT by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I prefer evil in place of bland and timid. He’s not Wally Cox.


17 posted on 04/11/2011 5:43:07 AM PDT by crosshairs (Say what you want about the South, but you never hear of anyone retiring and moving north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
...who only got in through some sort of Affirmative Action deal...

Barack Obama - the Affirmative Action President. Really.
18 posted on 04/11/2011 5:45:14 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Democratic Underground: The Hogwarts of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Concur. Sadly, John McCain was very much a creation of the MSM too. He was the Straw Man candidate who was pre-programmed to lose.


19 posted on 04/11/2011 5:45:52 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Obama will be on the counter-offensive on Wednesday with his budget plan.

I can tell you right now that it will be a complete and utter joke. Token cuts of a few billion in obscure programs and a massive set of tax hikes, allegedly "for the wealthy" but in fact for everyone who has a job and makes more than poverty level.

20 posted on 04/11/2011 5:47:55 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

He’s just now noticing that the suit’s empty?


21 posted on 04/11/2011 5:49:51 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
Sometimes I think we're living in a Dr Evil skit -- "Why cut trillions, when we could cut ... billions?"
22 posted on 04/11/2011 5:50:15 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
the president’s idea of how to bargain is to start by negotiating with himself, making pre-emptive concessions, then pursue a second round of negotiation with the G.O.P., leading to further concessions”

Yeah...like the French....

The only war they ever won was in fighting themselves.

23 posted on 04/11/2011 5:51:00 AM PDT by spokeshave (Obamas approval ratings are so low, Kenyans are accusing him of being born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Did he have to praise Congress for enacting “the largest annual spending cut in our history,” as if shortsighted budget cuts in the face of high unemployment — cuts that will slow growth and increase unemployment — are actually a good idea?

Tax cuts are "costs" and government spending cuts "slow growth and increase unemployment" ... and this from the most "enlightened progressive respected journalists in America". By this logic, if the government taxed 100% of all income and spent 10,000% of revenue, we would the in excellent shape economically.

24 posted on 04/11/2011 5:51:37 AM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Well, Paul, he never DID stand for much. If you hadn’t been so busy projecting your infantile dreams on him, you might have heard a few million voices declaiming him as an empty suit, a political cipher. But once again, you slept through the election and woke to the reality too late. It would almost be worth it if you learned your lesson, but you won’t. You’ll turn right around and do it again next time.


25 posted on 04/11/2011 5:59:47 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Obama turns out to be a legend in own mind.


26 posted on 04/11/2011 6:06:40 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (The heresy of heresies was common sense - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
There is a great new game for Obama's speeches called "BARACK'S BULLSHIT BINGO". It even comes with a bingo sheet and rules. A printable copy of the bingo sheet and the rules for it can be found here. Check it out, it is a hoot. Here is the sheet for the bingo
27 posted on 04/11/2011 6:09:25 AM PDT by Surtur (Are we on Athen's time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Don't you think your all being a little hard on him? I mean check out his schedule for today....grueling. No wonder he needs so many vacations.

9:00 AM
10:00 AM
10:30 AM Obama receives the presidential daily briefing.
11:00 AM
11:30 AM Obama holds a meeting on Libya.
12:00 PM
12:30 PM Carney briefs the press.
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
6:30 PM Joe and Jill Biden host a dinner for freshman senators.
7:00 PM

28 posted on 04/11/2011 6:14:28 AM PDT by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Reminds me of this snippet from a performance evaluation:

COMMUNICATION:
----- Talks with God.
----- Talks with the Angels.
----- Talks to himself.
----- Argues with himself.
----- Loses arguments with self.

Definitely a "5"

29 posted on 04/11/2011 6:15:45 AM PDT by NCjim (Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

the left is ticked at Obama. This should drop him to record low polling numbers here soon.

Hard to say if it will last....but...if dissatisfaction on the left LASTS, it will be very difficult for Obama to be re-elected, not unlike how the dissatisfaction with Bush on the right made it impossible for him to win in 1992....


30 posted on 04/11/2011 6:17:43 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

He won’t be missing for much longer, Krugmeister.

AP says he is going to take to the airwaves and propose higher taxes for the Eeeeevil Rich, plus cuts to Social Security and Medicare (which should leave all of you lefty bloggers in a cheery mood)


31 posted on 04/11/2011 6:29:00 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Well, I’ll be dipped! Will wonders never cease! LOL!


32 posted on 04/11/2011 6:42:39 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

He’s on vacation.


33 posted on 04/11/2011 6:48:35 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Oh c’mon Paul—the poor man just wishes he could be anonymous again (so why is he running for a second term?)..never mind.
34 posted on 04/11/2011 7:08:59 AM PDT by Neverforget01 (It Could Have Been Worse Is Not A Defense For Bad Policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson; PJ-Comix

***
What have they done with President Obama? What happened to the inspirational figure his supporters thought they elected? Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?
***

Pastor Charles — I know that Paul Krugman parodies himself effortlessly, but the first thing that came to mind when I read the above was:

“Look what they’ve done to Obama;
Look what they’ve done to my Prez ...”


35 posted on 04/11/2011 7:23:09 AM PDT by ShorelineMike (Constituo, ergo sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Krugman only writes 180 degrees opposite of the truth. If Krugman is ever correct about something, rest assured it was because he made an error.

Moreover, Krugman sees himself as sending signals to the White House. THE NYTimes believes that 0bama reads what they write. So from this perspective we can state that the NYTimes wants 0bama to “Fight.” That’s the left-wing mantra: fight. Anytime the Left sees itself as losing, they want to “fight.”

The reality, however, is that the NYTimes and the modern Left in general “rode the lightning” with 0bama in 2008. 0bama was an unknown (and the news media certainly wasn’t going to dig into his past).

Well, it turns out that 0bama feels differently on lots of issues than what his handlers had him saying during his Campaign. 0bama criticized Bush’s tax cuts, for example, then extended them once in Office.

0bama criticized Gitmo, then kept it open once in Office.

0bama criticized renditions, then kept doing them once in Office.

0bama criticized unilateral wars instead of “diplomacy first,” then bombed Libya instead of talking to Ghadafy.

0bama criticized the Patriot Act, then renewed it as President.

So Krugman and the Left are reaping a bit of what they sowed when they refused to look into 0bama’s background. They elected someone who was and is unknown...and he’s turning out to be a little different from their myth and hopes.


36 posted on 04/11/2011 7:38:49 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
"What have they done with President Obama? What happened to the inspirational figure his supporters thought they elected? "

Dear Paul "Palin-is-a-murderer" Krugman":

Good speechifying and a well-creased pant leg do not a President make. Wake up.

37 posted on 04/11/2011 7:51:08 AM PDT by cookcounty (Obama channeling TR: "Speak incessantly and carry a little schtick.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
"I realize that with hostile Republicans controlling the House, there’s not much Mr. Obama can get done in the way of concrete policy."

Why not? When Bush had to deal with a House and Senate controlled by the Dems, you weren't shy about excoriating him for not getting things done.

What were the Congressional Dems back then? Paid Spectators?

38 posted on 04/11/2011 7:57:02 AM PDT by cookcounty (Obama channeling TR: "Speak incessantly and carry a little schtick.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I thought the NYT was going to start charging money for Krugman’s drivel so we would have a good excuse not to read it. The guy is moron. It doesn’t matter in the least what he says or thinks about Obama. The only thing that matters is that Obama wants to destroy America, and Krugman is stupid enough to think that Obama merely wants to “change” America.


39 posted on 04/11/2011 8:01:03 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ..
RE :”Well, it turns out that 0bama feels differently on lots of issues than what his handlers had him saying during his Campaign. 0bama criticized Bush’s tax cuts, for example, then extended them once in Office. 0bama criticized Gitmo, then kept it open once in Office. 0bama criticized renditions, then kept doing them once in Office. 0bama criticized unilateral wars instead of “diplomacy first,” then bombed Libya instead of talking to Ghadafy.
0bama criticized the Patriot Act, then renewed it as President. So Krugman and the Left are reaping a bit of what they sowed when they refused to look into 0bama’s background. They elected someone who was and is unknown...and he’s turning out to be a little different from their myth and hopes.

I kind of see things similarly.

Krugmann wanted Obama to be another Roosevelt, to put the employers in chains and at the same time blame them for the unemployment (as they do on MSNBC evening/progressives shows) and have government come to the rescue and be remembered the hero. My grandmother died (over 100) a Republican who still remembered Roosevelt a hero of the Great Depression.

But Krugman failed to understand that Roosevelt had the sole Microphone, AM radio's and hollywood. Obama’s has to contend with FNC, talk radio and internet (including FR). He could never get away with the scam Roosevelt did for over maybe 40-45 % of the country. That is why Democrats want to get poor uneducated illegals to vote, they will buy it.

Krugmann’s other mistake is much like many on talk radio last year. Obama is ultimately pragmatic and wants to be re-elected (much like Clinton did in 1995 and 1996.) So Obama is not going to make a grand 'marxist' stand that makes sure he is a one termer, if he did it would be too easy for us.

Thanks for the thoughtful discussion.

40 posted on 04/11/2011 8:06:10 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I just prefer to imagine the title. It was good for a quick moment.


41 posted on 04/11/2011 8:09:53 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

The biggest fraud in american pulled by the media was Roosevelt. 80+% of the american people did not know he was crippled and in a wheel chair.


42 posted on 04/11/2011 8:16:00 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I realize that with hostile Republicans controlling the House, there’s not much Mr. Obama can get done in the way of concrete policy.

This is the part I really enjoy: there's no mention of the Democrat-controlled Senate here. It's got to be irksome for Reid and the boys, knowing that Obama's only gonna use them when he needs to shift the blame to somebody -- he's always going to take the credit for himself.

43 posted on 04/11/2011 8:42:57 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
RE :”I realize that with hostile Republicans controlling the House, there’s not much Mr. Obama can get done in the way of concrete policy..... This is the part I really enjoy: there's no mention of the Democrat-controlled Senate here. It's got to be irksome for Reid and the boys, knowing that Obama’s only gonna use them when he needs to shift the blame to somebody — he's always going to take the credit for himself.

What he may be saying which is accurate is that Obama is not going to get any new spending initiatives from the House not already in law. The current battles are about cutting spending inherited from prior budgets and CRs, which he is bemoaning.

You know Krugmann, he was calling for a 3-4 trillion dollar stimulus make works program and said deficits caused by government spending are good. But he knows he wont get that now. His prediction was that the $800B Obama stimulus was too small to work.

44 posted on 04/11/2011 8:52:17 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; LucyT; little jeremiah; azishot; Fantasywriter
Who is this bland, timid guy who doesn’t seem to stand for anything in particular?

One-word answer, ZER0!

Let's not forget, Kruggie, that you took part in achieving a lot of firsts:

The first POTUS who meets the progressive strict conditions below:

- Black (half), check

- h0m0sexual, check

- Brilliantly brainless, check

- Affirmative Action, check

- Uneducated (where are the education records?), check

- Highest-ranking illegal alien (sorry, undocumented immigrant worker who doesn't put a day of work), check

- Atheist, check

- Anti-American, check

AND,

What the hell am I missing?

Hey, Krug man, you thought that you elected a Krugerrand of a progressive messiah (12th imam?) and what did you get? Not even a rusty penny!

You did a magnificent job, my son...don't regret it.

Papa Alinsky, An American Communist Icon

45 posted on 04/11/2011 9:12:12 AM PDT by melancholy (.Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

To me, he’s kind of like the Emperor Claudius. Put in power half as a joke and half as a pawn for those wanted to pull the strings from behind the scenes. The difference is Claudius was actually intelligent, and he didn’t want to be Emperor, while Obama is a bumbling walking stick who wants power but doesn’t know he has no abilities.


46 posted on 04/11/2011 10:38:27 AM PDT by Badabing Badablonde (New to the internet? CLICK HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Nope, he lives in Dallas and spends some weekends in Crawford. He isn’t missing.


47 posted on 04/11/2011 11:40:47 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ('As a kid, I got three meals a day: Oatmeal, miss-a-meal, and no meal.' Mr. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I read the article and the comments. I usually categorize liberals as either uninformed and ignorant or just plain evil anti-American moochers. After reading their comments, I’ve come to the conclusion that it is a waste of my time to engage them in discussion or try to convince them with logic, facts, and statistics. They have their own version of those things and they aren’t going to change their opinions or their ways.

So what does that mean for the future of this nation? Compromise doesn’t resolve our differences or even lessen the conflict. One side controlling the debate and making the decisions infuriates the opposing side.

I don’t see a way to amicably split the nation’s resources and boundaries. I don’t see a way for all producers to “Go Galt” and deny the moochers. I don’t see anything but greater conflict and eventual civil war. If Americans can’t make it work with two diametrically opposed world views, how on earth do globalists expect to make it work on a grand scale?


48 posted on 04/11/2011 11:42:29 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

There’s a saying in programming. Garbage in, garbage out.

And yet another pithy saying, “There is none so blind as he who will not see.” For those who were willing to look, none of this is surprising at all. He is who we thought he was, who we warned he was.


49 posted on 04/11/2011 11:48:06 AM PDT by Hoffer Rand (There ARE two Americas: "God's children" and the tax payers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
But if you ask me, I’d say that the nation wants — and more important, the nation needs — a president who believes in something, and is willing to take a stand.

Poor, Paul. We knew this 3 years ago. However, he'll never turn his back on his "messiah" no matter how much he rants about his "timidity". He'll just call it constructive critcism or something equally dumb.

50 posted on 04/11/2011 11:51:42 AM PDT by azishot (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson