Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court rules against Arizona immigration law [The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals....]
Reuters ^

Posted on 04/11/2011 10:34:07 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2011 10:34:12 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nice & quick. Good.

Next SCOTUS.


2 posted on 04/11/2011 10:36:04 AM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The 9th Circus Court of Appeals, supporting anti-Americanism for over 20 years...


3 posted on 04/11/2011 10:36:45 AM PDT by American Quilter (DEFUND OBAMACARE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Never saw that one coming!!!!!!!!!!, LOL


4 posted on 04/11/2011 10:38:02 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
November was amazing! I can't wait until 2012!

5 posted on 04/11/2011 10:38:35 AM PDT by I see my hands (Embrace misanthropy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The most widely overturned court in the land.

God forbid we should ENFORCE the law.

6 posted on 04/11/2011 10:39:09 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The 9th sets itself up yet again for a smack down from the Supreme court. They never learn.


7 posted on 04/11/2011 10:39:32 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country. The thing is, Sarah loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What do you expect from the 9th?

It is very interesting that the Pretender Executive and his lapdog Holder are on the side of the suit that prohibits AZ from enforcing a Federal Law that his Pretendess doesnt want enforced. Its the same side as Mexico which filed as a “amigo de la court”. He is avoiding performing his sworn duty...(I forgot Muslims can lie if they have to )

Obama is on the side of the illegal immigrant and putting US citizens at risk every day!

Why is this asshat Obama still strutting around the golf courses?


8 posted on 04/11/2011 10:40:55 AM PDT by texson66 ("Mr Obama, tear down this wall of bureaucratic opression of freedom!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texson66
In the meantime thousands of illegal voters are pouring across our border.
9 posted on 04/11/2011 10:44:53 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Completely Unexpected!!!!


10 posted on 04/11/2011 10:48:22 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
The 9th Circus Court of Appeals, supporting anti-Americanism for over 20 years...

Actually, from what I've heard from my lawyer brother, on this issue the 9th Circus has typically been fairly sympathetic to the general sense of the Arizona law, so this is probably a real blow to its prospects.

That law was never going to survive the court challenges anyway, though. For as much as the Federal Gov't has failed in its duty with regard to illegal immigration, their arguments from the Supremacy Clause and the Constitutionally-mandated federal jurisdiction over immigration are valid and compelling.

It's probably much more effective to do as some states are moving to do ... and to bring suit against the FedGov to actually deal with the problem on the basis that their failure to do so is imposing large costs on the several states.

11 posted on 04/11/2011 10:50:28 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Why do we need court challenges? This is the peoples business; not the courts.


12 posted on 04/11/2011 10:52:29 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Here's the actual ruling.
13 posted on 04/11/2011 10:53:49 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
9th Circuit...

“Good Ideas are Unconstitutional!”

14 posted on 04/11/2011 10:55:06 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Why do we need court challenges? This is the peoples business; not the courts.

Because that's the way the system is set up in Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution.

15 posted on 04/11/2011 10:57:51 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

Yes no suprises here. 9th circuit just doing business as usual. Get thee to the SCOTUS.


16 posted on 04/11/2011 10:58:25 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m shocked, I tell you! Shocked!...oh wait, it’s the 9th circuit...never mind.


17 posted on 04/11/2011 10:58:36 AM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
their arguments from the Supremacy Clause and the Constitutionally-mandated federal jurisdiction over immigration are valid and compelling.

I found those arguments neither valid nor compelling. The Federal Government has already passed laws requiring local law enforcement to cooperate with the Feds in enforcing immigration laws much like the Arizona law requires. States like New York that do not cooperate are actually in violation of Federal Law. That Bozo and his AG don't prosecute does not make the law invalid.

18 posted on 04/11/2011 11:00:37 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
I found those arguments neither valid nor compelling.

So?

The Federal Government has already passed laws requiring local law enforcement to cooperate with the Feds in enforcing immigration laws much like the Arizona law requires.

It doesn't work both ways, though ... and that's the essence of the decision.

We agree that the Feds have failed to properly deal with illegal immigration. The question is how best to address that fact.

Arizona's approach was never going to pass muster in the courts.

19 posted on 04/11/2011 11:04:15 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government
that requires all citizens to prove
they are insured but not all
must prove they are citizens.


20 posted on 04/11/2011 11:05:31 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson