Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kaganís government money grab
Washington Times ^ | 4/12/11 | Editorial

Posted on 04/12/2011 5:07:34 PM PDT by Nachum

When President Obama outlines his tax-increase plan on Wednesday, it’ll be based on the liberal assumption that all money belongs to the government, with Americans retaining only what bureaucrats allow. That’s the dangerous argument Supreme CourtJustice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee, made last week in a case on education funding. Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn involved a tuition tax credit whereby Arizonans can contribute to groups providing scholarships for private schools. Some cranks argued that because the scholarships can be used at religious schools,

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: government; grab; harvardresumefraud; kaganresumefraud; kagans; money; nojustice; notruth; noveritas; obamaresumefraud; queenofresumefraud; resumefraud
Elections have consequences
1 posted on 04/12/2011 5:07:39 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/kagan.htm


2 posted on 04/12/2011 5:10:02 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

yes, and not fighting appointments hard enough does too.. how does a president get to be a king in this country.


3 posted on 04/12/2011 5:11:20 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
What do you mean liberal assumption, it seems that we have more than a smoking gun proof that most of the republicans feel the same way, they just want to spend a little less. Damn the so called Mr tarp Ryans budget increases spending for twenty five years.
4 posted on 04/12/2011 5:13:33 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

By being a half ‘black’ liberal Democrat.


5 posted on 04/12/2011 5:13:57 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

>>> Elections have consequences

Fraud has consequences too.


6 posted on 04/12/2011 5:16:33 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“When President Obama outlines his tax-increase plan on Wednesday, it’ll be based on the liberal assumption that all money belongs to the government, with Americans retaining only what bureaucrats allow.”

That is, the argument first advanced by Marx/Lenin/Trotsky, otherwise known as State Socialism, but in reality a euphemism for oligarchical communism.

Ironic that, after fighting the Cold War for many decades, pouring our national treasure and countless lives into the struggle, and watching the former Soviet Union, as well as Communist China, move in the direction of capitalism, our leaders have embraced the World Communist Movement, albeit long after it became terminally moribund elsewhere.

The American motto seems to be, “First win the war, then surrender.”


7 posted on 04/12/2011 5:20:31 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
At present, Anthony Kennedy is the only thing standing between us and a totalitarian regime.

Frightening.

8 posted on 04/12/2011 5:28:07 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
When President Obama outlines his tax-increase plan on Wednesday, it’ll be based on the liberal assumption that all money belongs to the government, with Americans retaining only what bureaucrats allow. That’s the dangerous argument Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, an Obama appointee, made last week in a case on education funding.

That is also the legal definition of money in U.S. Tax Court. No joke - under the I.R.S. Code, taxpayers own no money - zero, zip, nada. The foundation of the argument that is used to support the income tax is that all of "your" money is the governments, and they "let" you have a certain amount of it back, after they keep part. That's the law - or at least the government's interpretation of the law that you will face if you go to tax court. Kagen is merely letting the cat out of the bag.

9 posted on 04/12/2011 6:05:01 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So Kagan, former head of the Harvard Law School and appointed by Obama, is a flaming Socialist. Whodathunkit?


10 posted on 04/12/2011 6:08:23 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
The Kagan & Sotomayor hearings were farces worthy of Saturday Night Live. I recall in particular the Bull Dyke dodging a question on whether the government can order citizens to eat three veggies a day.
11 posted on 04/12/2011 6:13:17 PM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01

“At present, Anthony Kennedy is the only thing standing between us and a totalitarian regime.”

How true


12 posted on 04/12/2011 6:14:13 PM PDT by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Grahamnesty loves her and Sotomayor, two outright Socialists, Open Borders and Sharia Law/Finance endorsers...not to mention Socialized Medicine.

We are f-ed.


13 posted on 04/12/2011 11:36:03 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

true dat! Culture shift. The days of aspiring to become a ‘self made man of means’ disappeared. We’re spoiled by our own ‘earned success’.


14 posted on 04/13/2011 5:27:52 AM PDT by griswold3 (Character is destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
The foundation of the argument that is used to support the income tax is that all of "your" money is the governments, and they "let" you have a certain amount of it back, after they keep part.

excellent point

15 posted on 04/13/2011 5:47:35 AM PDT by servantoftheservant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

yes and Republicans just folded instead of exposing the nominees


16 posted on 04/13/2011 9:16:35 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson