If true, this is a nutty policy. What I'd like to know is the name of the person responsible for setting this policy.
1 posted on
04/12/2011 7:25:39 PM PDT by
Zhang Fei
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: Zhang Fei
This has been going on for what three years( at least) now? It’s not the first time I’ve read this.
81 posted on
04/13/2011 2:52:12 PM PDT by
Karliner
(Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
To: Zhang Fei
"While there may be ample evidence to detain an individual, the same evidence may be insufficient to obtain an indictment or bring the detainee to an evidence-based trial," Dorrian said. "In other instances, individuals may be detained based on legitimate intelligence, but the intelligence may be classified and thus not able to be presented in open court. In some instances, this results in the individual being released."I suppose we should expect such things when we send lawyers to fight our wars. Good men and women will die as a result but at least the lawyers and paper-pushers are kept busy. God (Please) Bless America and deliver us from ourselves.
83 posted on
04/13/2011 4:18:49 PM PDT by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: Zhang Fei
This was announced by Obama not long after he became President.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson