Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surging food prices fuel ethanol critics
AFP ^ | Apr 10, 2011 | Rob Lever

Posted on 04/17/2011 9:18:25 AM PDT by george76

A surge in global food prices has prompted fresh criticism of US subsidies for ethanol, which diverts massive amounts of corn from global food supplies for energy.

Senators Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma, and Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat, introduced a measure last month to scrap the tax credit of 45 cents per gallon for ethanol in gasoline.

"The ethanol tax credit is bad economic policy, bad energy policy and bad environmental policy. The $6 billion we waste every year on corporate welfare should instead stay in taxpayers' pockets where it can be used to spur innovation, stimulate growth and create jobs," said Coburn.

The lawmakers cited a Government Accountability Office report describing the tax credit as "largely unneeded today to ensure demand for domestic ethanol production."

C. Ford Runge, a University of Minnesota professor of applied economics and law, argues that ethanol from crops has many "hidden costs" that should dissuade the government from subsidies.

Runge, who raised concerns about ethanol policy as early as 2007, says his research suggests some 30 percent of food price increases come from diversion of US corn for ethanol.

"If you're taking 40 percent of the US corn crop, the largest of any country on earth, and putting it to one use... you don't have to have a Ph.D in economics to know that's going to put upward pressure on prices," he told AFP.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Kansas; US: Maryland; US: Minnesota; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: burningfood; cardin; cfordrunge; coburn; corn; energy; ethanol; food; foodsupply; subsidies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Alice in Wonderland

Horrible, isn’t it? I have writeen to both my senators (both very conservative) and did not even receive a reply. There is a website for folks who want to get the old inhalers back, but it doesn’t seem they are making any progress.


21 posted on 04/17/2011 11:32:38 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

” Horrible, isn’t it? I have writeen to both my senators (both very conservative) and did not even receive a reply. There is a website for folks who want to get the old inhalers back, but it doesn’t seem they are making any progress. “

That’s because even Congress doesn’t dare meddle in the affairs of the all-powerful EPA...

(For months, now, I’ve had problems with my Combi-Vent inhaler running out of propellant before the month runs out - The VA pharmacists tried to tell me that it was my fault, and I’d just have to do without until the prescription came due for refill... Now I’m wondering if it isn’t the non-CFC propellant that’s causing my problem?? I also hate the nebulizer, which ties me up so I can’t do anything else for that half-hour 3 or 4 times/day)


22 posted on 04/17/2011 11:58:47 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

“The VA pharmacists tried to tell me that it was my fault, and I’d just have to do without until the prescription came due for refill.”

Ah, yes, the compassion of government health care. Those inhalers are useless. I have heard that there are portable nebulizers, but I haven’t looked into it. Hope you are OK.

Freegards,
Pining


23 posted on 04/17/2011 12:04:49 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m still scratching my head over how putting 10% ethanol in my gasoline,
that then gives me 10% less fuel economy, makes me less dependent on arab oil.


24 posted on 04/17/2011 12:11:38 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Tagline closed for repairs. Please use the next available tagline. We appreciate your patience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

” Hope you are OK. “

Thank you...

I’ve been doing pick ‘n’ shovel work turning over my substantially enlarged garden, and I’m slowly rebuilding lung capacity (cancer survivor- lots of scar tissue in my lungs from the radiation treatments) - sometimes I can get away with just one nebulizer session for the whole day....

Hate to admit that my Dad was right all those years - ‘hard work is the best medicine’... ;)


25 posted on 04/17/2011 12:11:53 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
131,000 BTUs are needed to make one gallon of ethanol. One gallon of ethanol has an energy value of only 77,000 BTUS.

Thus, 70 percent more energy is required to produce ethanol than the energy that actually is in it.

Every time you make one gallon of ethanol, there is a net energy loss of 54,000 BTUs.

26 posted on 04/17/2011 12:23:29 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

If it takes one gallon of gas to make one gallon of worthless ethanol, then this game does nothing for our dependency on arab oil


27 posted on 04/17/2011 12:27:47 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Corn ethanol subsidies totaled $7.0 billion in 2006 for 4.9 billion gallons of ethanol.

That's $1.45 per gallon of ethanol (and $2.21 per gal of gas replaced).

28 posted on 04/17/2011 12:34:08 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mountn man
Thanks for the ping, mountn man.

This is all deliberate and purposeful.

29 posted on 04/17/2011 2:25:13 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor
Not to mention the ground water that is wasted. What an insane policy..

I agree that it's insane policy, for all the reasons listed above. That said, the "uses too much water" argument is irrelevant here in Iowa. We're not short on water here, and it's not like the water becomes something other than water in the process. This is not by any means a defense of our idiotic ethanol policy, though.

30 posted on 04/17/2011 7:49:05 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...

Angry Ben Cardin is doing the right thing for a change? Hell just froze over.

However, Cardin and Coburn can forget about running for President. Iowa, you know.

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


31 posted on 04/17/2011 11:12:37 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Follow me on Twitter @mpetrie98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

MTBE was just fine as an additive and we didn’t have to use food for fuel.


32 posted on 04/18/2011 6:37:53 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor

Corn-based ethanol is an economic, environmental, and moral disaster. If there is anything that the left and right should agree on, it is corn-based ethanol.


33 posted on 04/18/2011 7:05:32 AM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

“Corn-based ethanol is an economic, environmental, and moral disaster.”

OTOH, cellulose-based methanol may be a win-win. I’ve become a substantial shareholder of this company:

http://www.lignol.ca/

It’s the real deal. DYODD.


34 posted on 04/18/2011 7:45:29 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Many bio diesel plants are running on animal fat now.
35 posted on 04/18/2011 9:40:26 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Hydrogen Advocacy Group Anti-Ethanol Agitprop One-half gallon of oil in the form of pesticides per bushel of corn would cost $2 to $3 per bushel. If this were true -- and it clearly isn't -- it should be enough to illustrate to literally anyone that the price of petroleum is quite literally the ONLY thing driving corn prices. And this idiotic piece of agitprop -- from a hydrogen "energy" advocacy site -- also shows the guy in the encounter suit spraying chemical fertilizer, a sight that I've never been privileged to see, what with me *growing up on a farm*.

36 posted on 06/04/2011 4:55:05 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson