Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Obsession with the British Monarchy?
Conclub ^ | 04-18-11 | The Rat

Posted on 04/18/2011 3:14:00 PM PDT by TheConservativeCitizen

A WALT DISNEY FAIRY TALE IN A NON-FAIRY TALE WORLD

- The royal wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton is nearly upon us. Cable news channels are ramping up for 24×7 coverage. Brits of all shapes and sizes are busting at the seams, and people around the world who yearn for the days of Princess Diana are coming out of the woodwork like crazy. Why?

Think about it: On April 29, millions upon millions of people the world over will watch the wedding of a woman who is only famous because she is marrying a man who is only famous because he happened to be born into a family that has been declared royal by the British government. And you thought Kate Plus 8 was ridiculous?

While I somewhat understand the delusional fixation the British themselves have with the whole monarchy thing, the celebrity-worshiping obsession that millions of Americans seem to have with this fairy tale escapes me. Given that British Royalty has essentially been ceremonial for the last 400 years or so, the whole thing is a bit bread and circuses, don’t you think?

I mean hey — let’s talk seriously for a minute. Prince Charles (“His Royal Highness, The Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales,” to be precise) seems like a nice enough chap, but Pee Wee Herman even thinks he’s prissy. Here’s a guy who’s waited around his entire life to become king, only to realize that he may in fact be passed over in favor of his number-one son, Prince William. (who also has a long pompous name) So what does Poor Charles have to show for it? By most accounts, an annual income in excess of $29 million. Not bad for a king in waiting, huh?

So what does the Prince of Wales actually do all day? I mean, what exactly does he do for a living anyway?

According to the Mirror, Charles is a very busy fellow indeed. In addition to 25 or so “royal engagements” per week, (shaking hands and cutting ribbons), he devotes a fair amount of time to his pet causes, which include the environment and organic farming. He seems to visit quite a few factories and businesses and such, where he passes out lots of “well done; carry on.” compliments. (and more handshakes of course) At an event in Halifax, Charles spent so much time shaking hands that the concert band was forced to play God Bless the Prince of Wales three times.

Between jaunts around Britain aboard the Royal Train, or by way of his dark blue Jag, Charles finds time to squeeze in get-aways to former British Colonies for more pomp and circumstance. All things considered, not a bad gig for the money.

For a majority of Brits, (referred to as monarchists), support of the Royal Family is inextricably linked to patriotism. Conversely, a significant portion of the population is becoming increasingly vocal in its opposition to the monarchy, calling it an expensive and unaccountable institution, particularly during weak economic times in an increasingly competitive world.

The bottom line is this: The monarchy costs British taxpayers in excess of $100 million a year; principally for the purpose of allowing the queen’s royal subjects to feel good about themselves and forever bask in the glory of the “good old days” of the British Empire.

Oh, and for all you crazy American monarchists, be sure to visit the official Royal Wedding site. It’s pretty impressive; Cinderella would be jealous.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: princewilliam; royalty; royalwedding; wedding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2011 3:14:02 PM PDT by TheConservativeCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

The establishment love dictatorship


2 posted on 04/18/2011 3:18:04 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

Beats dead air on the TV screen?


3 posted on 04/18/2011 3:18:44 PM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

Beats dead air on the TV screen?


4 posted on 04/18/2011 3:18:54 PM PDT by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

The Brits would be far better off if they ditched the Royal Family and used Miss England and the Page 3 girls who usually pose topless for the British tabloids for Royal Family stuff (presiding over the opening of Parliament, grand openings of Burger King locations, etc.).


5 posted on 04/18/2011 3:19:30 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

“Why the Obsession with the British Monarchy? “
********************************

the most “common” folks have never gotten over it...

In reading of the framers of the first constitution, The Articles of confederation, we see that they have always wanted george replaced with their own King, namely, George Washington...george wouldn’t play ball, but...they never got over it...and certain figureheads have well taken advantage of this problem...


6 posted on 04/18/2011 3:20:00 PM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

If it is of no import, why not ignore it? Why waste all those words and electrons on a non-event?


7 posted on 04/18/2011 3:21:25 PM PDT by La Lydia ("California: When the parasites outnumber the hosts, it's all over.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
Why the Obsession with the British Monarchy?

Cause tourists are money.

8 posted on 04/18/2011 3:22:44 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

Million upon millions in a world of billions isn’t really an obsession. Most of the folks I know could give a crap, until I saw the date in this article I didn’t even know when it was (soonish was about the best I had). The vast majority of the world won’t be paying any attention.


9 posted on 04/18/2011 3:22:58 PM PDT by discostu (Come on Punky, get Funky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
The English accept royalty because they feel that makes them royal by extension over to the rest of us.

Have you noticed they often talk about “The Wooooorld!”

They can't just say “the world”, it has to be “The Wooooorld!”

10 posted on 04/18/2011 3:26:26 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Whether they want to admit it or not, everyone knows Obama is hiding his bc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

An old law for the ‘’news’’industry.. If there’s no leading news story, then create one. This wedding is as exciting as watching a cat clean itself.


11 posted on 04/18/2011 3:30:34 PM PDT by shadeaud ("If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten." -- George Carlin B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

The Obsession with the The royal wedding is mostly by women and Chris Mathews. They love fairy tales.

The gay guys I know only watch the wedding to goof on Prince Williams ‘barky’ attire.


12 posted on 04/18/2011 3:31:41 PM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

If you don’t want to see it-—don’t watch it.

Leave the brits alone and let them have their fun. They may be Muslimised in the very near future, they need all the recreation they can get.


13 posted on 04/18/2011 3:33:13 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
The bottom line is this: The monarchy costs British taxpayers in excess of $100 million a year; principally for the purpose of allowing the queen’s royal subjects to feel good about themselves and forever bask in the glory of the “good old days” of the British Empire.

I'll see them and raise them one "affirmative-action president" who is costing us a whole lot more than $100 million a year, and that with no end in sight (so far).

14 posted on 04/18/2011 3:41:50 PM PDT by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
Why the Obsession with the British Monarchy?

Caught in tangled web of Gaddafi

Could scrapping the Civil List spell more power for Prince Charles?

Libyan gun-runner and friend of Prince Andrew 'gave Princess Beatrice £18k necklace' before Duke allegedly lobbied British company for him

Now Prince Andrew comes under fire for links to ruler of second corrupt former Soviet state

Prince Andrew's choice of friends called into question AGAIN after four-day stay with a sex offender

15 posted on 04/18/2011 3:45:31 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

I dont know anyone who gives a rats ass about any of these people. This is 100% media driven, no one cares.


16 posted on 04/18/2011 3:47:01 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Here's one more....

'Follow the Islamic way to save the world,' Prince Charles urges environmentalists

17 posted on 04/18/2011 3:47:40 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

Given what the royals get up to, I’m thinking someone ought to give a dang.


18 posted on 04/18/2011 3:49:04 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Case in point that mentions George Soros...

Prince Charles brokers $1bn deal to save Indonesian rainforests

19 posted on 04/18/2011 3:50:58 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Mentions Buck House....

Colonel Gaddafi's son buys £10m Hampstead mansion

20 posted on 04/18/2011 3:53:56 PM PDT by mewzilla (Were members of both political parties in on the Lockerbie bomber deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson