Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Mama Grizzly' Sarah Palin back on the prowl (Politico Deeply Saddened!)
Politico ^ | April 18, 2011 | Jonathan Martin

Posted on 04/19/2011 7:43:42 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner

It's a fool's errand to use traditional indicators as definitive evidence that Sarah Palin is or is not running for president. If nothing else, she's made clear since her national debut two-and-a-half years ago that she plays by her own set of rules.

But her pugnacious speech over the weekend in Wisconsin, promotion thereof and re-launch of her PAC's website today, suggests that she very much wants to stay in the political conversation. As has been well-documented, Palin reads most everything written about her. So she surely didn't miss recent stories about her declining poll numbers and relative quiet. For one who relishes the fight, and the attention that comes with it, there is something far worse than being criticized and that's being ignored or written off.

After the last three days, that's not likely to happen again.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; benedictromney; martin4romney; miltromney; palin; palinistaparanoia; paranoidpalinistas; politico; politico4milt; politico4romney; politicoflack; politicoprrep; romney; sarahpalin; smelllikemilt; stenchofromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Springfield Reformer
Say, y’know, since they’re both basketball aficionados, maybe they could play a winner-takes-all one-on-one match. Wonder who would take that contest, eh? Barracuda much?

That is a great idea! :)

21 posted on 04/19/2011 9:13:41 AM PDT by RedMDer (restoration of our honor, dignity, and freedoms will save America. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

“SHE’S BACK!”

She’s their Poltergeist, or was that from Freddy?


22 posted on 04/19/2011 9:14:53 AM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"It's a fool's errand to use traditional indicators as definitive evidence that Sarah Palin is or is not running for president. If nothing else, she's made clear since her national debut two-and-a-half years ago that she plays by her own set of rules."

He should have stopped right there.

23 posted on 04/19/2011 9:28:06 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



Spend a Lot of Time at Free Republic?
Get a Lot of Information?


Donate what you can afford

Or sign up to donate monthly
and a sponsoring FReeper will donate $10

Urgent: Save Lazamataz! Donate today

24 posted on 04/19/2011 9:32:03 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

WooHoo Sarah!
25 posted on 04/19/2011 9:51:00 AM PDT by RedMDer (restoration of our honor, dignity, and freedoms will save America. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

A pagan ritual like this with a witch-doctor type does not enhance Sarah’s reputation. Invoking the name of our Lord Jesus does not change the nature of this nonsense.

I pray that she admits to some emotional distress at the time and walks away from this.


26 posted on 04/19/2011 9:55:26 AM PDT by saltus (God's Will be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

How is this a negative article?


27 posted on 04/19/2011 11:13:35 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

What does this have to do with Romney? He’s not even mentioned in the article.


28 posted on 04/19/2011 11:14:55 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saltus

Well, if she does get to the general, I expect the Muthee Blessing to come forward again and be rebutted again. First, while it is arguable that Kenyan preacher Muthee (what’s the deal with Kenya, anyway?) is not in the mainstream of Christian belief, and that he may have been involved in some crazy mischief back in Kenya, there is no reasonable case to be made that he is a “Witch-doctor” type in the sense of being pagan.

You can argue he is heretical, but to be pagan one must adopt at least some obviously pagan ideas and practices, and praying over a local politician in hopes that God will use them to increase righteousness in the nation is not a pagan sentiment. Indeed, the left flipped out over it because to them, what they heard was a threat of distinctly Christian theocracy, which of course was also a mistake on their part, but the dead opposite of what you are saying.

For evidence, I offer the exacts words of Muthee’s prayer over Palin, shown below, which do not betray any obvious paganism per se, though for the sophisticated theologian there are hints of the Word of Faith paradigm and a strong aroma of postmillennial triumphalism, which many Christians, including myself, reject as poor interpretation of Scripture (though I do not reject the idea that Christians should be salt and light in every walk of life, as God calls them, per Calvin):

“Thank you, Jesus. Let’s all pray. Let’s pray for Sarah. Hallelujah! Come on, hold your hands up and raise them. Hold them and raise them up here! Come on, talk to God about this woman! Come on, talk to God about this woman we declare favor from today. We say favor, favor, favor! We say praise my God! We say grace to be rained upon her in the name of Jesus. My God, you make your judgment, you make room. You make ways in the desert, and I’m asking you today, we are asking you as the body of Christ in this valley, make a way for Sarah, even in the [inaudible]. Make her way my God. Bring finances her way, even in the campaign in the name of Jesus, and above all give her the personnel, give her men and women that will back her up in the name of Jesus. We want righteousness in this state. We want righteousness in this nation. Because you say [inaudible] in the name of Jesus. Our Father, use her to turn this nation the other way around. Use her to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and the hearts of the children to the fathers so that the curse that has been there long can be broken. In the name of Jesus. Father, we thank you today. We come in the hindrance of the enemy, standing in her way to there. In the name of Jesus, in the name of Jesus! Every form of witchcraft, it will be rebuked in the name of Jesus. Father, make her way now. In Jesus’ name, Amen.”

So, unless you are expecting her to write a treatise on the theological errors of the remnants of the Latter Rain movement as they appeared in the sermon and prayer of a visiting minister from Kenya, I do not see that she has anything to repent of. Indeed, considering who she is up against, seeking God’s intervention against profound spiritual evil seems highly appropriate. I have often thought that the foaming mouth railing against her went so wildly beyond rational precisely because it had it’s origins in the darkest recesses of Hell.

And as we know from Scripture, a prophet does not have to be a good prophet speaking from good motives to issue a blessing to one chosen by God for a special purpose. I refer you, of course, to Baalim, who would have cursed Israel if he’d had his own way but God wrung a blessing out of him despite himself.

Bottom line, if you have trouble with Sarah over Muthee, the problem is mainly Muthee, not Sarah. I have also heard, but have not yet been able to confirm, that her church affiliation has changed. Based on what we know about her, she is soundly Christian, if not a seminary theologian, and has the good sense to put her faith in Jesus and let the “professionals” duke it out over the fine points of prophetic speculation.

Peace,

SR


29 posted on 04/19/2011 11:18:24 AM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar; Diogenesis
What does this have to do with Romney? He’s not even mentioned in the article.

Diogenesis is providing context of the author's previous connections to politically-motivated reporting regarding Palin. I think that's appropriate when evaluating the article. Don't you?

30 posted on 04/19/2011 11:20:13 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Winning The Future" = WTF = What The F*** / "Kinetic Military Action" = KMA = Kiss My A**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

How can you be back if you’ve never left?


31 posted on 04/19/2011 11:24:21 AM PDT by curth (Organize4Palin.com - NOW IS THE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom; Diogenesis; Virginia Ridgerunner

This thread reeks of paranoid hooey.


32 posted on 04/19/2011 11:31:44 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

33 posted on 04/19/2011 11:37:37 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Mama’s going hunting.


34 posted on 04/19/2011 11:41:18 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
This thread reeks of paranoid hooey.

Then stop posting, so we don't get any more of it. ;)

Sorry, but you did walk right into that one...

35 posted on 04/19/2011 11:42:39 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Winning The Future" = WTF = What The F*** / "Kinetic Military Action" = KMA = Kiss My A**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

I guess you’ve never been to a Pentacostal service before.


36 posted on 04/19/2011 12:07:38 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: curth

Yeah, you’re right. The only place she has really “gone” to is to India and Israel. And then she took a two-week break of sorts, and all her critics and attackers declare that she’s disappeared. Too funny!


37 posted on 04/19/2011 12:33:10 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

She posted an oil policy post on Facebook on March 30

She left a blistering Facebook post about the military on April 8

She was on TV with Judge Pirro on April 9

She appeared at Women Of Joy in Oklahoma on the April 18

This was just another Journ-o-list/Republican Cocktail Party meme , intended to convince “somebody” that she has faded and is not interested in running for President.

Be aware of this weeks new meme: She has a bad voice! It started here last night and was repeated verbatim by Kirstin Powers earlier today. I think the bottom of the barrel has been scraped.


38 posted on 04/19/2011 12:47:17 PM PDT by curth (Organize4Palin.com - NOW IS THE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: curth
It started here last night and was repeated verbatim by Kirstin Powers earlier today.

Yeah, the PDS'ers sure know how to feed the libs. Concerning her voice, I like to point out that Abraham Lincoln's was shrill and tinny, with a hick accent.

39 posted on 04/19/2011 12:55:50 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Au contraire, my Friend. I’ve attended Assembly of God churches many times. I did eventually quit and go back to my Baptist roots, but the years of my fellowship among them were mostly a positive experience. I understand and do not want to get tangled up in a prolonged discussion about whether the gifts have ceased, but I don’t see any Scripture that creates an absolute barrier to modern works of the Holy Spirit that would resemble those of the early Church.

OTOH, the reason I quit this church, among other reasons, is that A) tongues was being “taught” in classes (utter nonsense, if you’ll pardon the pun) and B) while many of the purported prophetic utterances were wholesome, Biblically sound encouragements, others drifted off into obvious error and were not being corrected by church leadership.

See, to me, as an attorney and a Christian, that’s bad, but it’s a far cry from the charge of paganism, which I regard as a serious and specific charge that requires specific and credible evidence. Paganism is an identifiable set of theological beliefs and is accompanied by practices that support those beliefs. Some of those practices have abandoned their pagan roots and been grafted into Christian practice, such as Christmas trees. Other practices actually occurred in both a pagan and a Christian setting, such as tongues, and as a result have an entirely different meaning and mode of operation for Christians.

So, unless you can show me anything in Muthee’s prayer that gives credence to pagan deities, or pagan monism, or at least something that has zero basis in New Testament teaching, then I have to consider the case unproven. I think hard-core Word of Faith teaching is provable error, and that you can trace it, with some effort, to a pagan theory of monism. But that is not evident in or obvious to most folks who attend these groups. They are, or were when I was going, basically just Baptists who believe God can and still does the miraculous among His people if they invite Him to do so. I have nothing against them for believing that, but I do wish they would do the discipline that goes along with that, using Scripture to defend against the encroachment of error. Like Paul, I would rather know what everyone was saying than have to worry whether a given tongues-speaker was God-impelled or self-propelled.

Therefore, in general, I’ve concluded that while some incidents here and there do bear the marks of the truly miraculous, most of what goes on in these fellowships is driven, not by the incursion of an insidious paganism, but by the desire to be as much like the early church as possible, even if they have to do a little pretending to make it so. I don’t think the pretending is harmless, but many of them were and are excellent people, with whom I would gladly share a fox hole in battle, and who would give the shirt off their back to make your life and mine better. So writing them all off in a single stroke is not as straightforward for me as it apparently is for you.

Peace,

SR


40 posted on 04/19/2011 1:35:45 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson