Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. court reinstates Blackwater Iraq shooting case
Reuters ^ | 04/22/2011 | James Vicini

Posted on 04/22/2011 3:11:57 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

(Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge erred in dismissing all charges against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards accused of killing 14 Iraqi civilians in 2007, an appeals court ruled on Friday.

The unanimous three-judge panel reinstated the charges and sent the case back to the judge for more proceedings, handing a victory to the U.S. Justice Department in a high-profile prosecution dating to 2008.

The five guards were charged with 14 counts of manslaughter, 20 counts of attempt to commit manslaughter and one weapons violation count over a Baghdad shooting that outraged Iraqis and strained ties between the two countries.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackwater; donaldball; dustinheard; evanliberty; iraq; legal; meja; nicholasslatten; paulslough; ricardourbina; trial; xeservices
This probably isn't good. The defendants made statements to State on forms that explicitly said that their statements COULD NOT be used against them at criminal trial. Then, the government used those statements against them. The charges were dismissed by the district court judge, but now have been reinstated.
1 posted on 04/22/2011 3:12:02 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

No, not good. Vindictive and stupid, if you ask me.

I read the article to see if there was anything more on the three judge appeals court. But—nothing. Probably another gang of liberal activists.


2 posted on 04/22/2011 3:15:59 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Sounds like an Obama political favor to me. The libs will lap it up.


3 posted on 04/22/2011 3:30:18 PM PDT by Gator113 (GAME ON. I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Much more information can be found below, if you’re interested.

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/04/appeals-court-reinstates-blackwater-manslaughter-case-in-dc.html


4 posted on 04/22/2011 3:30:49 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I’m no lawyer, but I’d be curious to know what kind of standing the U.S. government has to prosecute crimes committed in a foreign country by non-military personnel.


5 posted on 04/22/2011 3:54:45 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"I’m no lawyer, but I’d be curious to know what kind of standing the U.S. government has to prosecute crimes committed in a foreign country by non-military personnel."

MEJA. Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000.

With the particular case, the defendants moved to dismiss the charges, but Urbina - the judge that eventually dismissed the charges on other grounds - refused to dismiss on those grounds.

As of today, I believe there have been roughly 6-people who have been either convicted or pleaded guilty to violations of MEJA.

6 posted on 04/22/2011 4:18:48 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks OldDeckHand.
...handing a victory to the U.S. Justice Department...

7 posted on 04/22/2011 6:17:27 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Ah, that’s an interesting case. Each one made statements on forms that said the statements could not be used against them in a criminal trial.

The trial judge said using those statements tainted all the evidence, and dismissed the charges.

The appeals court said that the judge needed instead to evaluate the evidence against each defendant individually, to see what evidence against THAT defendant was tainted by the use of HIS testimony.

For example, one defendant’s testimony could be used to charge the OTHER defendants, even though it couldn’t be used against that defendant. So if the prosecuter can argue that evidence against a defendant was based on the testimony of a different defendant, that evidence should be admitted.


8 posted on 04/22/2011 9:21:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson