Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury finds that Jones's protest would breach peace
ABC ^ | 04/22/2011 | Staff

Posted on 04/22/2011 4:24:18 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

DETROIT (WXYZ) - The jury has found that a proposed protest by Quran-burning pastor Terry Jones outside the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, the largest mosque in the United States, is likely to breach the peace and incite violence.

The jury has been debating since 3:30 p.m .Thursday. The main issue of the trial was whether or not Jones' main purpose was to say or do something that would incite violence.

(Excerpt) Read more at wxyz.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1dollar; 1dollarbond; corruption; court; crusade; detroit; dhimmitude; donutwatch; freespeech; islam; jihad; jihadinamerica; jones; judicial; koran; march; moslemswin; muslim; muslimcancer; precrime; sharia; terryjones; trial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last
To: OldDeckHand

Now that we’re kicking the unions in the teeth I’m hoping we can get to a point where we attract some more conservatives to the state and solidify our grip.

Its a real sportsman’s paradise outside the cities.


51 posted on 04/22/2011 5:15:57 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I’m thinking my state is pretty rightward except for Philly. New York except for the 5 buroughs and a few perditionopolises to the north and west. Ohio beyond Cleveland.
Like the famous red-blue election map says. Geographically we’re a red nation with a few gangrenous areas of blue...where most of the people are clustered.
I am not optimistic.


52 posted on 04/22/2011 5:16:52 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (0bama let Lt. Col. Lakin go to prison rather than show his paperwork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Dearborn is the core of Conyers district.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
53 posted on 04/22/2011 5:20:49 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Thank God for the Electoral College. They’ll have to pry it my cold, dead left hand, as my right hand will be holding a .45.


54 posted on 04/22/2011 5:23:24 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

How can they complain about tying up traffic when Muslims are allowed to prostrate themselves several times a day in the street in front of a mosque?


55 posted on 04/22/2011 5:23:47 PM PDT by kitkat ( I sure HOPE that it's time for a CHANGE from Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Well, you know how sensitive they are...


56 posted on 04/22/2011 5:26:45 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

The problems with the koran burning and the WTC Mosque

In all this argument of recent days, the most important fact of the matter has been obvious from the start, but is rarely spoken of by the media or the public.

Regarding the Florida koran burning, has anyone stepped back and listened to what people are saying in detail? The first thing a person will hear is how that Pastor has the Constitutional right to do what he is doing.

The next series of statements, however, are always the majority of statements made in these conversations, namely: It is the wrong thing to do, it is inciteful, it is a cult in Florida, muslims will hate us, it will endanger the troops, and, most importantly for this conversation: we are not at war against a religion, but extremists of that religion.

This is important because of the islamic world’s reaction to this Florida Pastor; namely, that the islamic world immediately protested the planned koran burning by condemning the entire country of the United States and marched and chanted promoting our deaths to cries of “DEATH TO AMERICA!”

The response by virtually all American politicians has been an apologetic tone, one where they immediately call for the koran burning to stop, observations that it IS inciteful and that the threats to Americans at home and American Troops abroad are not acceptable and that the safety of the American public are paramount in this case.

Their tone has been to cower in fear at these threats. Not one politician has stepped forward and exclaimed, “Islam is not being attacked by an entire country or an entire religion, Islam is only being attacked by a radical. Islam needs to remember we are not all against Islam and threats to our safety are wrong and inciteful and hate filled.”

Not one. They cower to the islamic world, refuse to hold them to the same standard of behavior as they insist from their own people, refuse to insist that the Pastor in Florida is an anomaly and that the United States is no threat to islam.

What they did was bow in submission to the sensitivities of the islamic world and deny the Florida Pastor his civil rights to speak out like an American.

The islamic world will not notice. They will riot anyways. It is identical to the cartoonists in Denmark. All it took was one cartoonist to make a cartoon of Muhammad and the entire islamic world was in the streets and threatening to kill anyone who makes a cartoon of Muhammad.

Theo Van Gogh made a movie about this islamic submission in Holland, and they killed him for making the movie.

The Florida Koran burning case is quite similar to the Ground Zero mosque case with some significant differences. In Florida, the Pastor must stop his koran burning or there will be violence across the globe, and in fact, even if he does stop, there will be violence across the globe due to him stating he wanted to burn korans. In New York City, the Imam who wants to build a mosque 2 blocks away from Ground Zero, he said on CNN that if we move the mosque or deny it’s construction, there will be violence across the globe.

In both cases, if we do not submit to islamic sensitivities, there will be violence across the globe, in fact, even if we do submit to islamic sensitivities, there will most likely be violence anyways due to the fact that we spoke of those things.

Free speech is threatened in Florida, and a new twist is happening in New York City, something that Israel has seen does not work, and that is LAND FOR PEACE.

The Ground Zero mosque is about LAND FOR PEACE. If we give islam the land to make a mosque, there will be peace. If we do not give islam the land, there will be violence.

Think this through people. In both of these cases, neither has anything to do with the original concerns people expressed. It is solely about whether we submit to islamic sensitivities or have violence.

It is about Islamic blackmail of the United States.

James Bancroft USMC 1977-1981


57 posted on 04/22/2011 5:36:26 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Same community where the public high school holds football practice at midnight to accommodate Muslims and Ramadan.


58 posted on 04/22/2011 5:46:18 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

In the “Good and Welfare Clause”! Just ax Congressman John Conyers if you don’t believe me!


59 posted on 04/22/2011 5:51:45 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (Death to tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
Same community where the public high school holds football practice at midnight to accommodate Muslims and Ramadan.

Pigskin???

60 posted on 04/22/2011 5:52:17 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
You forgot to mention that Islamists kill Christians EVERY DAY, regardless of whether a Koran is burned. Oh, it may up the death toll of Christians by a couple of percentage points, but who's counting? They're only Christians.

In fact, POINTING out that Christians are getting slaughtered, would probably be considered a "hate crime".

61 posted on 04/22/2011 5:52:24 PM PDT by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Why do you ask? Sharia Law is not subject to the US Constitution.

On the other hand, the Constitution may become subject to Sharia Law if things continue as they do in America.


62 posted on 04/22/2011 5:55:13 PM PDT by 353FMG (The M1911 is mightier than the sword.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: k5kor

“This is a Christian Nation....”

.
The Founders meant it to be that way, but they failed to state so in the Constitution.

They never imagined that 20th century US government would allow Islam to invade this country, unopposed.


63 posted on 04/22/2011 6:03:46 PM PDT by 353FMG (The M1911 is mightier than the sword.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
It's entirely believable in an America that elects Obama president.
64 posted on 04/22/2011 6:04:37 PM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

wait.. what? he was *thinking* about protesting outside a mosque, and they put him in jail because the occupants of the mosque might get angry?

wtf

(just coming into this story... news to me)


65 posted on 04/22/2011 6:06:11 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Where did they find authority for this in the Constitution?

ROTFL what an outdated question.

66 posted on 04/22/2011 6:09:42 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Well, Obama has stated that the US is *not* a Christian nation. In the same speech, he did say that the US is a muslim nation.


67 posted on 04/22/2011 6:21:40 PM PDT by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sten
"wait.. what? he was *thinking* about protesting outside a mosque, and they put him in jail because the occupants of the mosque might get angry?"

That's it in a nutshell. He was jailed because he refused to sign and pay for the $1 peace bond (think restraining order), which would have been acknowledgement that he was legally restrained from protesting. That, of course, is WILDLY unconstitutional - a violation of not only the USC but also of MI law as well.

The ACLU - yes, that ACLU - pretty easily sets aflame the state's case here, in their Amicus brief to the court - which the court then completely ignored.

68 posted on 04/22/2011 6:24:22 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

It occurs to me that there are parts of the Qu’ran that directly incite violence. By this reasoning, a jury could plausibly find that publishing the Qu’ran should be banned.


69 posted on 04/22/2011 6:31:48 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Jones’s is not incorrect. If you’re referring to all the Joneses, possession is indicated by Joneses’.


70 posted on 04/22/2011 6:37:47 PM PDT by FoxInSocks (B. Hussein Obama: Central Planning Czar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Islam will not be unopposed if these professional money grubbing “churches “ wake up and fight for oxygen because the damned godless muslims will cut the throats of their “congregation” and blow up their “churches”.WAKE UP!!!


71 posted on 04/22/2011 6:44:12 PM PDT by k5kor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks OldDeckHand.
The jury has found that a proposed protest by Quran-burning pastor Terry Jones outside the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, the largest mosque in the United States, is likely to breach the peace and incite violence.
Apparently the jury is familiar with Islam.


72 posted on 04/22/2011 6:50:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Well, there's a style contradiction in the body of the article:

The main issue of the trial was whether or not Jones' main purpose...

73 posted on 04/22/2011 6:50:08 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Terry Jones goes free on $1 bond after jailing; judge bars him from mosque for 3 years

A Dearborn jury sided with prosecutors, ruling that Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp would breach the peace if they rallied at the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn. They were briefly jailed for refusing to post a bond.

74 posted on 04/22/2011 6:52:13 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A Birther: One who has questions or concerns over the birth of Barry Barack Hussein Soetero Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
From Pamella Geller

Islamic law comes to Dearborn

This is where she won a lawsuit to run bus ads offering help to Muslims in fear of their lives.

75 posted on 04/22/2011 6:52:32 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

From the live blog

http://www.freep.com/article/20110422/NEWS02/110422013/Live-blog-Terry-Jones-fights-having-pay-hold-anti-Muslim-protest-Dearborn

Dearborn police led Pastor Terry Jones out of the coutroom. He’s on his way to jail. Chaos as group of radicals yell at Jones supporter.
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 11:37:42 PM6:37 PM

Stunning. What a day. #terryjones
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 11:42:27 PM6:42 PM

Helicopters are still buzzing around above the Dearborn courthouse. Tight security around here. Livonia sent special response team to help.
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/23/2011 12:02:13 AM7:02 PM

Pastor Terry Jones was also ordered to stay away from Islamic Center of America of Dearborn for 3 years, unless mosque leaders say it’s ok.
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/23/2011 12:05:08 AM7:05 PM

Changing their mind, pastors Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp post $1 bond and have been released, Mayor just told me. They are free.
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/23/2011 12:49:44 AM7:49 PM

‘’I’m relieved that no one got hurt,’’ Dearborn Mayor Jack O’Reilly Jr. told me. #terryjones
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/23/2011 12:52:00 AM7:52 PM


76 posted on 04/22/2011 6:58:24 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A Birther: One who has questions or concerns over the birth of Barry Barack Hussein Soetero Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Some Muslims in Dearborn call Quran-burning worse than 1,000 deaths, police chief testifies t.co
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:10:47 PM5:10 PM

Check out @Freep photo gallery of Friday prayers today at the Islamic Center of America, where Jones wants to protest. t.co
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:12:33 PM5:12 PM

Hundreds at Dearborn counter-rally plead for peace. Held near courthouse where jury is deliberating. t.co
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:13:51 PM5:13 PM

Court was just called back in session for a verdict. #TerryJones
by DearbornPatch via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:31:29 PM5:31 PM

Jury coming back in. #terryjones
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:33:00 PM5:33 PM

Guilty. #terryjones
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:39:45 PM5:39 PM

A Dearborn jury sided with prosecutors today, determining that Pastor Terry Jones and his assistant would be likely to breach the peace.
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:41:38 PM5:41 PM

Judge Mark Somers will now determine the conditions of Terry Jones’ bond.
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 10:42:43 PM5:42 PM

BREAKING NEWS: Pastor Terry Jones and his assistant are going in jail after they both refuse to pay $1 cash bond. #terryjones
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 11:05:17 PM6:05 PM

Stunned, supporters of Pastor Terry Jones are asking: how could he be jailed before he even attempted to protest at mosque?
by nwarikoo via twitter at 4/22/2011 11:35:45 PM6:35 PM


77 posted on 04/22/2011 7:00:03 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A Birther: One who has questions or concerns over the birth of Barry Barack Hussein Soetero Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Realman30

“. . . guess this only applies to liberals.”
___________________

Liberals & Muslims.


78 posted on 04/22/2011 7:01:12 PM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; Hot Tabasco; OldDeckHand

Correct. They wanted JOnes to post a $100,00 peace bond. As if Jones could do that.

So he opted for a jury.

Jury said no march.

But what I don’t understand is why the Judge determined Jones should pay a bond of $1.00?

Jones refused - so he was arrested.

????

All in all - the muzzies scored a huge victory today.


79 posted on 04/22/2011 7:05:32 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A Birther: One who has questions or concerns over the birth of Barry Barack Hussein Soetero Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

At the end of Friday’s hearing, Somers ordered both Jones and Sapp to stay away from the mosque for three years — an order that drew gasps and shouting in the courthouse.

The pair were tried under a rarely used law originally passed in 1846 that requires those who are likely to breach the peace to post “peace bonds.”

“Nobody expected this,” Charlie Langton, a lawyer and legal analyst, said of the judge’s decision to jail Jones and Sapp. “It is prior restraint, but the judge followed the letter of the law. It’s purely legal because it’s never been challenged.”

At the Islamic Center, a cheer went through the crowd of 100 after police initially announced the jailing.

“That’s what should happen when people say they are going to break the law,” said Neda Kardri, 29, of Dearborn.

http://www.gainesville.com/article/20110422/WIRE/110429839/-1/news?Title=Terry-Jones-jailed-in-Michigan-for-refusing-1-peace-bond-

Oh. I see. Jones was arrested BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO BREAK THE LAW. Not that he did - no sir. But becausae of some 150 year old law - he was arrested because of what he might do.

Un-freaking-believable.


80 posted on 04/22/2011 7:09:58 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A Birther: One who has questions or concerns over the birth of Barry Barack Hussein Soetero Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
From link

The pair were tried under a rarely used law originally passed in 1846 that requires those who are likely to breach the peace to post "peace bonds."

81 posted on 04/22/2011 7:14:35 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

IANAL, but if the judge had offered me a choice of “judge, or jury” I’d have declined to choose, just to be on the safe side.
Otherwise they can say it’s a kangaroo court he “chose.”


82 posted on 04/22/2011 7:16:51 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (0bama let Lt. Col. Lakin go to prison rather than show his paperwork.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

How can a jury and court be convened to find a “guilty verdict” before any action happens?

This jury was set up on thursday?


83 posted on 04/22/2011 7:18:42 PM PDT by neverbluffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Inciting violence means directing people TO violence, not being willing to suffer from people’s violence to YOU!


84 posted on 04/22/2011 7:37:43 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: Responsibility2nd
“It is prior restraint, but the judge followed the letter of the law. It’s purely legal because it’s never been challenged.”

Sounds like it should be!

86 posted on 04/22/2011 8:15:01 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I am assuming this will be appealed? Anybody know?


87 posted on 04/22/2011 8:15:25 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
he was arrested because of what he might do.

Life imitates art.

88 posted on 04/22/2011 8:24:03 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

which goes to show, we’re not longer a nation of laws... just a nation of cute guidelines that will be inflicted upon the political enemies of the ruling party

so much for upholding the Constitution. their word is sh*t. treat them accordingly.


89 posted on 04/22/2011 8:43:03 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

WOnder if they would restrain muslims for the same kinds of protests.

Seriously doubt it. They’d probably demand the church stop holding services.


90 posted on 04/22/2011 9:14:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

This is a repeat of the Illinois Nazis v. Skokie from the 70’s. Just replace religion of peace with Holocaust survivors in that case. It’s basic constitutional law that even a 2nd year law student would know.

It’s a prior restraint on free speech and I hope Dearborn has a good municipal insurance policy because they are going to owe Pastor Jones a lot of money when this gets overturned. For once I actually agree with the ACLU (and I can’t believe I’m saying that.)


91 posted on 04/22/2011 9:32:26 PM PDT by Feasor13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Here’s a prior restraint case that’s similar to the current one...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie


92 posted on 04/22/2011 9:34:20 PM PDT by Feasor13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Obama said this is NOT a Christian nation. You must have missed the speech.

You have Free Speech ... to the extent that it doesn’t offend people who will get violent with you. Then you’re “inciting” and you have no Free Speech.

If our free speech is limited by the sensibilities of others, then we have no free speech.

Have police go with the guy. Protect him. Let him have his First Amendment rights. Move on.

Where’s the ACLU on this one? Isn’t this exactly the type of case they hop in when it’s a leftist kook doing Piss Christ?


93 posted on 04/22/2011 9:36:23 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
"Where’s the ACLU on this one? Isn’t this exactly the type of case they hop in when it’s a leftist kook doing Piss Christ?"

The ACLU filed an Amicus brief with the court earlier today. Also, I understand that both men will now be represented by the ACLU in their appeal. Unfortunately, the men represented themselves today. That was a mistake.

From what I understand, on several occasions, the trial judge asked if they would like to object, which would have preserved certain issues on appeal. Either they didn't understand the importance of such objections, or they didn't care. In any event, those errors will make it a bit more challenging for the ACLU. But still, it would be WILDLY unlikely these men don't prevail - either in state or, or eventually in federal court.

94 posted on 04/22/2011 9:44:36 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
"I am assuming this will be appealed? Anybody know?",

One of the Detroit TV stations is reporting that the ACLU will be representing both men in their appeal - FWIW.

I suspect it's likely we'll see an appeal, and later a civil action filed against Wayne County.

95 posted on 04/22/2011 9:49:38 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
Jones’s?

Jones’

Either is considered correct, but Strunk & White prefer Jones's (or did when I was in school).

96 posted on 04/22/2011 9:58:28 PM PDT by Kanakabaraka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

“This is a Christian Nation....”

.
The Founders meant it to be that way, but they failed to state so in the Constitution.
Oh?

Then exactly what "Lord" were they talking about when they SIGNED AND SEALED The Constitution using THIS language (IN The Constitution)?


Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. In Witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names...

97 posted on 04/22/2011 10:00:56 PM PDT by Don Joe ([expletive deleted])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Lawsuit City . . . some nice $$$ for deprivation of Constitutional rights


98 posted on 04/22/2011 10:10:34 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Celebrate 'Civility'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

This is really unbelievable.

The two groups that the left-wing will want to lock you up if you speak against them are Islamists and homosexual perverts.

Perverts, terrorists and democrats... perfect together.. oh my!


99 posted on 04/23/2011 12:27:55 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

The Muslims are expected to react as if they are without responsibility for their own actions


100 posted on 04/23/2011 12:43:56 AM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson