Skip to comments.
Challenge to President Obama's Eligibility to be Heard by 9th Circuit Court
New American ^
| 4/25/2011
| Joe Wolverton, II
Posted on 04/25/2011 9:40:26 AM PDT by GregNH
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: CedarDave
21
posted on
04/25/2011 10:14:09 AM PDT
by
GregNH
(Re-Elect "No Body")
To: cinciella
22
posted on
04/25/2011 10:14:50 AM PDT
by
GregNH
(Re-Elect "No Body")
To: CedarDave
You’re talking about the photo of the LFBC of one of the Nordyke twins. It’s been posted on dozens of bc threads recently.
23
posted on
04/25/2011 10:15:23 AM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: GregNH
The ninth circus has laready received the ruling they are to issue following the circus they will tent up. And the Pirate Roberts isn’t going to toss any pebbles into the lake of lies which will gush from the circus tent.
24
posted on
04/25/2011 10:16:54 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: cinciella
PS, I’ve sent them the link.
25
posted on
04/25/2011 10:17:10 AM PDT
by
GregNH
(Re-Elect "No Body")
To: cinciella
In support of their position, the plaintiffs claim to have evidence of the following challenges to President Obamas ineligibility for the office he now occupies:
1. Mr. Obama has been using a stolen Social Security number since 1980-81 according to Dr. Taitz; moreover, Obama never resided in Connecticut where his Social Security number 042-68-4425 had already been issued to a Connecticut resident in March, 1977. Taitz verified Obama’s continued usage of the allegedly stolen number via public Selective Service website information, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and also E-Verify documentation. Taitz has brought suit against the U.S. Social Security Administration for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) violations.
26
posted on
04/25/2011 10:20:37 AM PDT
by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: GregNH
9th Circuit?
What a FlusterCUt.
“FREE THE LONG FORM!”
27
posted on
04/25/2011 10:25:04 AM PDT
by
Dryman
("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
To: GregNH
By now, the eligibility question should no longer be about Obama but about our NATIONAL SECURITY.
The secret of Obama’s past is only a secret to the American people but certainly not to the many heads of state in this world. Their security services, by now, must know the most intimate details of Obama’s personal history.
It can safely be assumed that most American politicians, Demococrat as well as Republican, and national security agencies are well aware of Obama’s past.
Certainly, the previous president, his advisors and the opposing presidential candidate in 2008 did not spare any effort in familiarizing themselves with Obama’s family history.
Isn’t it putting our nation’s security at great risk when we have a POTUS who is so obviously vulnerable to the threat of blackmail from the many antagonistic heads of state and private individuals?
28
posted on
04/25/2011 10:25:12 AM PDT
by
353FMG
(The M1911 is mightier than the sword.)
To: GregNH
To: SteveH
Fraud will be Obama’s downfall.
30
posted on
04/25/2011 10:26:12 AM PDT
by
opentalk
To: GregNH
GREAT! THANKS! I’ll be watching for it. Everyone on both sides of the aisle seems to check Drudge, so it will be really interesting if they post it, and hopefully people will read what the case actually says.
To: Old Retired Army Guy
That's what I say, 9th. circuit, don't hold your breath.
32
posted on
04/25/2011 10:34:08 AM PDT
by
Licensed-To-Carry
(Hey Obama! All you have done is awaken a sleeping giant and filled us with a terrible resolve!!)
To: GregNH
8. Multiple cable television hosts are deriding undeclared presidential candidate Donald Trump for questioning Mr. Obama's presidential eligibility, raising additional serious questions as to why cable hosts are attempting to silence Mr. Trump while not reporting Taitz's evidence especially if Mr. Obama is ever found to be ineligible, and whether his executive orders and Supreme Court appointments would also be nullified. Way to go Orly!
I'm sure that judges will find this evidence very relevant to the case.
To: GregNH
Well whoppee, will be heard at the 9th short Circuit Court? A fair hearing there is the same as a snowball’s chances in Hades. IOW, nada.
34
posted on
04/25/2011 10:51:50 AM PDT
by
Sea Parrot
(Being an autodidact, I happily escaped the bureaucratization of intellect)
To: Tex-Con-Man
Any predictions on how the 9th circus will rule on this one.
I have no illusion that the 9th circuit will settle anything. However, whether it affects Obama or not, judicial clarification of the term "natural born citizen" needs to be made at some point or we could be arguing this issue for some future presidential election.
So, the only question I have is whether the USSC will hear a likely appeal of the 9th circuit's ruling (on the matter of the term "natural born citizen").
To: CedarDave
36
posted on
04/25/2011 10:54:32 AM PDT
by
Sea Parrot
(Being an autodidact, I happily escaped the bureaucratization of intellect)
To: GregNH
The ninth circuit is the Harlem Globetrotters of the federal courts. They don't follow the rules but they get their fans cheering for doing some legal stunts and beating their opponent.
37
posted on
04/25/2011 10:57:56 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! Tea Party extremism is a badge of honor.)
To: GregNH; LucyT; Bikkuri; faucetman; warsaw44; ColdOne; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; GQuagmire; ...
Ping....................
Challenge to President Obamas Eligibility to be Heard by 9th Circuit Court
9 circus, don't hold your breath!
38
posted on
04/25/2011 10:59:48 AM PDT
by
melancholy
(Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
To: GregNH
39
posted on
04/25/2011 11:02:57 AM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Release Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich and let him and his family get on with their lives.)
To: GregNH
Yes, it's the 9th Circus Court.
But even so, aren't there rules of evidence?
All Orly has to do is subpoena the real Birth Certificate. No?
40
posted on
04/25/2011 11:14:44 AM PDT
by
FroggyTheGremlim
(We will fight for America and it starts here in Madison, WI. It starts here. It starts now.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson