Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Furious Obama demanded detailed birth certificate after continued questions
Washington Post ^ | April 27, 2011 | Anne E. Kornblut

Posted on 04/27/2011 10:38:52 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Albion Wilde

Can’t you just see him stamping his feet in a petulant frenzy? “Im petulant, and I’m having a frenzy!”


61 posted on 04/27/2011 11:25:28 AM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

There is no evidence that this form is not a lie. Democrats and moslems lie for their cause and are practiced at it. The long form was prepared after sufficient research to satisfy the best experts.


62 posted on 04/27/2011 11:26:29 AM PDT by x_plus_one (Q:How many middle class debt slaves does it take to pay for Obama care? A: All of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

I still believe when we see his authentic Long Form Birth Certificate, it will have “unknown” listed under father! I suspect Stanley Ann Dunham had leather heels.


63 posted on 04/27/2011 11:26:37 AM PDT by King Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

he is pissed. It is hilarious.


64 posted on 04/27/2011 11:27:05 AM PDT by rokkitapps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

“mainstream media was perpetrating a dangerous myth.”

The MSM off script? That IS news!!


65 posted on 04/27/2011 11:28:33 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

After spending over a million dollars to keep it hidden, he suddenly “furiously” demands it be released?

Gawd... what do these MSM idiots take us for?


66 posted on 04/27/2011 11:31:42 AM PDT by Ronin ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves" -- Bertrand de Jouve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl
Snicker. Is the "New York" way smacking down the "Chicago Way"? I'll match my street thug against your street thug, lol. I hope Trump gives him a nervous breakdown.

BINGO:
The Chicago way is to continually threaten to escalate until the other guy blinks.

The New York way is to get in your face and call the bluff of braggarts and bullies.

That is the great weakness of the Chicago way. The old line was in the Chicago school if he brings a knife, you bring a gun. But when the other guy shows up with an M1A2 and you have nothing bigger than a pea shooter you are going to fold. Once you reach the point where you can't escalate you are forced to back down. And once a person has to back down on one issue there opponent knows that they will have to keep backing you down on every issue.

Obama has shown the limit of his ability to escalate. He can't hurt Trump, can't demonize him in the press, and doesn't have the cash to buy him off. Now that Obama has shown the world that he can no longer escalate, he is going to get hammered for everything else he has been keeping hidden. Trump is already asking for his college records. How about who actually wrote his books. How about the notes on his meetings with the head of SEIU.
67 posted on 04/27/2011 11:33:34 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
obamma ought to allow a group of reporters from msm, conservative reporters, and on-line reporters, like Judicial Watch and the such go to Hawaii and look at the birth certificate in person, take pictures of it and whatever else they want to do with the certificate without destroying it, to finally put this thing to bed.

What obamma did today by releasing this form is raise many more questions about the authenticity of the document.

68 posted on 04/27/2011 11:34:31 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Just curious:

1. If Obama personally requested a long form birth certificate from Hawaii officials in April 2011, does it mean that Obama did not have a copy of his long form birth certificate BEFORE he wrote to Hawaii in April 2011?

2. That is, why did Obama write to Hawaii to request a copy of his long form birth certificate in April 2011, if he already had one in his possession? Such a request seems strange to me.

3. What about the birth certificate that Obama wrote about in one his books? I think he wrote that he accidentally found it when it in his home when he was a teenager. I assume it was the long form. What happened to it? Did Obama lose it?

4. NOTE; June 2007: Date stamped on back of Obama's short form we see at the FactCheck website.

5. NOTE: April 2011: Date stamped on the front of Obama's long form birth certificate that Obama recently released to the public.

6. Just wondering: If in April 2011 Obama requested a long form birth certificate from Hawaii, does it mean that Obama lost his copy of his long form birth certificate sometime in the past?

7. That is, if Obama already had a copy of his long form birth certificate, why did he have to order one in April 2011?

8. June 2007: Obama orders short form birth certificate from Hawaii. It looks to me like Obama had already lost his long form birth certificate by June 2007, because why would he order a new birth certificate in 2007?

9. As we know, back in 2007, people still had the choice of ordering a short form or a long form, but Obama decided to order the short form, a decision that forced Obama to turn around and request a long form birth certificate in April 2011.

10. I just find it curious that Obama would first order a short form in 2007, when he could have ordered a long form birth certificate, which he did do in April 2011.

11. So when do you think that Obama lost his copy of his long form birth certificate?

12. It had to be before 2007, when he ordered a short form birth certificate, which means that Obama did not have a long form birth certificate for over 4 years, from at least 2007, a lose that forced him to order another long form birth certificate from Hawaii in April 2011 to replace the one he apparently lost sometime before June 2007.

69 posted on 04/27/2011 11:37:11 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

bfl


70 posted on 04/27/2011 11:39:23 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Mr. Resident, Now that we are getting under your skin, please release the real long form. We’ve see this one before.


71 posted on 04/27/2011 11:39:53 AM PDT by chainsaw ("The government cannot give to anyone anything that it does not first take from someone else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
Does anyone have a copy of the version that he released in 2008? I'm wondering if this is exactly what was put out in 2008 or a slightly different version.

Obviously he still refuses to release the real thing--but thinks that this will enable the media to shut down the issue.

72 posted on 04/27/2011 11:41:57 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright

He has still not answered the question as to why the team of lawyers and the million n$$$ plus spent to keep the alleged BC under wraps.

We still have not seen the real long form BC. What he release is another version of what he released before.


73 posted on 04/27/2011 11:42:44 AM PDT by chainsaw ("The government cannot give to anyone anything that it does not first take from someone else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Here’s another question. Why are two different names listed as the “Local Registrar”? On Obama’s BC (Aug 4, 1961) it looks like U-something-Lee compared to the Nordyke BC (Aug 11, 1961) which shows a totally different Registrar. Did the Local Registrar change in 7 days?


74 posted on 04/27/2011 11:43:31 AM PDT by TennesseeGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Reminds me of Kerry never releasing his military records.


75 posted on 04/27/2011 11:43:56 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Does anyone remember the controversy when Pelosi filed for his candidacy twice, with 2 different DNC registration documents? Maybe making “corrections” to the 2nd one? Vaguely remember that happening during the 2008 campaign.


76 posted on 04/27/2011 11:50:01 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Wright

Exactly as you say. Something smells. It is good that he is all wee-weed up about it though. Maybe the stress will get to him.


77 posted on 04/27/2011 12:11:17 PM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
"Obama, furious, demanded that his staff finally get a copy of his long-form birth certificate from Hawaii [...] And so he asked counsel to look into this. The swift action that followed – in less than 10 days, Obama’s lawyers were able to obtain the legal waivers necessary to bring copies of the certificate back to the White House"

I sympathize with him. I know how tough that can be... when I needed my BC I needed to go ALL THE WAY DOWNTOWN with $12.

And those darn 'legal waivers' to get it, gosh those were tough.

Everyone who has had to get 'legal waivers' to get their own BC knows this. What are these waivers called again? And what did they file to obtain them? what kind of paperwork or form do you file? can we see that?

78 posted on 04/27/2011 12:17:49 PM PDT by Mr. K (this administration is WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY~!! [Palin/Bachman 2012])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Oh, so now it’s “my idiot staff’s fault”?
How convenient! If anyone working for this guy had some actual pride they’d walk off the job today.


79 posted on 04/27/2011 12:19:31 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
“He did that despite the fact that it probably was…probably in his long-term political interests to allow this birther debate to dominate discussion in the Republican Party for months to come,” White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said. “But he thought even though it might have been good politics, he thought it was bad for the country. And so he asked counsel to look into this.”

BS. The only reason the big eared menace released anything is because he felt he was forced to. His handlers saw that he was losing the battle of public opinion. What about the birth certificate he has been carry around for all these years? There never was one, or it had information that shows him to be a liar.

80 posted on 04/27/2011 12:19:40 PM PDT by One_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson