Skip to comments.Nader calls for primary challengers to Obama
Posted on 04/28/2011 6:05:54 AM PDT by tsowellfan
Nader calls for primary challengers to Obama
Discontent on the left with President Obama is finally moving toward some form of primary challenge. Jennifer Epstein of Politico writes:
Nader told POLITICO on Wednesday that he is working on bringing together about half a dozen presidential candidates who could "dramatically expand a robust discussion within the Democratic Party and among progressive voters across the country." Each would focus on a specific issue where the far left says Obama hasn't done enough, including the environment, labor and health care.
Nader, who has run for president five times as an independent or third party candidate - including his 2000 run on the Green ticket, which some Democrats say cost Al Gore the election - said that for next year, he believes an ideologically based, multi-candidate primary challenge would be the best way to pull Obama to the left ahead of the second term he believes Republicans will not be able to stop. (snip)
Nader suggested that Jim Hightower, a liberal commentator and a co-chairman of his 2000 presidential campaign, could be one candidate but didn't offer other names. The ideal candidates, he said, would be people who have a history of progressive positions and who have specific knowledge or credibility in a certain policy area.
But Nader, a registered independent, wouldn't be one of them, he said, since all the candidates would be dedicated Democrats who could benefit from party infrastructure. "This isn't like a third-party or independent candidacy," he said. "This is different; it's simple: They're inside the party, they can certainly raise enough money for legal assistance filling out forms, they support Obama, but want him to keep his 2008 promises."
This is not nearly as serious as a third party challenge would be, for that has the potential to draw away votes. All this intra-party challenge would do is allow the left to express its frustration, and potentially make Obama look moderate. In the end, the left will turn out to vote for Obama.
In the words of the Bard: "Sound and fury, signifying nothing."
Never happen. Hussein Cult runs deep with Democrats. Anyone who runs against Hussein is a racist.
What the Dems never seem to get is the fact that the Republicans are so dum-founded stupid that they sit around with their peenie in their hands looking for a mirror. If the Dems, or any other party you can come up with, produced an intelligent, honest, to-the-point candidate who confronted the problems spot-on, AND PRODUCED ANYTHING RESEMBLING AN INTELLIGENT SOLUTION TO THEM, he could get elected in a landslide. BOTH PARTIES ARE QUALITATIVELY BANKRUPT, and double-down stupid. Both parties are determined not to lose; neither are committed to a win.
Ralphie does this every four years so he can buy a new suit.
If indeed the re-erection of The Won is inevitable...then why should The Won care what discontented "progressives" say in an alleged primary. Why would he need to move left?
Of course, going hard left isn't going to win back the coveted "swing voters" that Obama has already lost.
This crap about inevitability bugs me. Does anyone who voted against the Son of a Kenyan regret doing so?