Posted on 04/28/2011 10:03:29 AM PDT by DCBurgess58
That is a GOLD MINE
A lot of interesting reading, including the fact that he only lists one child in 1964 .. that being “ROY”
I’m getting a big cup of coffee, and enjoying some reading of REAL documents
ping
Well you are certainly welcome. I’m tired of the back-biting among the faithful on this topic. I try to keep an open mind, so much so that sometimes my brain falls out.
Occam’s Razor. A lot of the nitpicky stuff people come up with is just too wild or involved to be the likely truth. But science, that is where this situation will be resolved, not opinions and speculation.
Stay safe FReeper!
Thx for your earlier explanations. One more question for you. I understand that the new PDF posted today has 20 layers instead of nine from yesterday. What would cause an increase or change like that?
I am sorry, I was watching soccer yesterday and must have missed it. Do you have a link for me?
Isn't there a case or two that are still in court, or that are in an appeal process? In any case, whomever took this to court already and lost, can't he at least ask for appeal based on new evidence, (the phoney birth certificate?).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.